Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Oppo R7 (2015) 16GB vs Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB: Specs & Scores

Created date: 2018-09-30 22:30:51, Updated date: 2020-04-16 19:34:54

Oppo R7 (2015) 16GBNokia 3 (2017) 16GB
Oppo R7 (2015) 16GBNokia 3 (2017) 16GB

How did the evaluations between the "Oppo R7 (2015) 16GB" and "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" differ when we compared the two? We reviewed each of the most commonly scrutinized features. If you are thinking about which smartphone to get, check out this review immediately!

Oppo R7 (2015) 16GBNokia 3 (2017) 16GB
Oppo R7 (2015) 16GB

Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB

General rating:

58.5/100

(The 1308th of all smartphones)

52.8/100

(The 1447th of all smartphones)

Holding comfort
72/100
68/100
Weight
71/100
74/100
Screen size
74/100
74/100
Display quality
85/100
59/100
Battery life
54/100
59/100
Processing power
61/100
39/100
Memory capacity
60/100
50/100
Storage capacity
50/100
50/100
Rear camera performance
61/100
50/100
Front camera performance
58/100
58/100

"Oppo R7 (2015) 16GB" and "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB", performance comparison

"Oppo R7 (2015) 16GB" and "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" size comparison. Which to choose?

The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.

The "Oppo R7 (2015) 16GB" has a width of 71.0mm, a length of 143.0mm, and a thickness of 6.3mm. Also, the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" has a width of 71.4mm, a length of 143.4mm, and a thickness of 8.5mm.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't much difference between the "Oppo R7 (2015) 16GB" and "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" in terms of size. For that reason, the ease of gripping and carrying the devices in one hand is about the same for both. Therefore it's better to compare them in terms of performance and functionality.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the "Oppo R7 (2015) 16GB" and the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB". For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

Comparing the overall size of the two devices, there isn't a big difference in size between the "Oppo R7 (2015) 16GB" and the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB". For that reason the ease of carrying and use with one hand is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreDimensions (width x height x thickness)
Oppo R7 (2015) 16GB72/10071.0mm x 143.0mm x 6.3mm
Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB68/10071.4mm x 143.4mm x 8.5mm

"Oppo R7 (2015) 16GB" and "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison

The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.

The weight of the "Oppo R7 (2015) 16GB" is about 147.0g, and the weight of the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" is about 140.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, there isn't much difference in weight between the "Oppo R7 (2015) 16GB" and "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB". That's why the likelihood of fatigue in the fingers and wrists after extended use is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreWeight
Oppo R7 (2015) 16GB71/100147.0g
Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB74/100140.0g

"Oppo R7 (2015) 16GB" and "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB", whose display is easier to use?

The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.

The "Oppo R7 (2015) 16GB" has a 5.0inch display. Also, the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" has a 5.0inch display. Comparing the screen size, there is a negligible difference in screen size between the "Oppo R7 (2015) 16GB" and the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB". As a result, the app buttons on both are equally easy to press. We recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreDisplay size
Oppo R7 (2015) 16GB74/1005.0inch
Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB74/1005.0inch

"Oppo R7 (2015) 16GB" and "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB", which has a clearer display?

Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.

The resolution on the "Oppo R7 (2015) 16GB" is 1080 x 1920, and pixel density is 440ppi. Also, the resolution on the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" is 720 x 1280, and pixel density is 293ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "Oppo R7 (2015) 16GB" has much higher pixel density than the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB", with a difference of roughly 147ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "Oppo R7 (2015) 16GB" is superior to the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "Oppo R7 (2015) 16GB" over the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB".

ScorePixel density
Oppo R7 (2015) 16GB85/100440ppi
Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB59/100293ppi

"Oppo R7 (2015) 16GB" and "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB", a summary of the differences in battery life

Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.

The "Oppo R7 (2015) 16GB" is 2320.0mAh, and the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" is 2630.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, there is a negligible difference in battery capacity between the "Oppo R7 (2015) 16GB" and "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB". Since both have roughly equal battery life, you are better off comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreBattery capacity
Oppo R7 (2015) 16GB54/1002320.0mAh
Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB59/1002630.0mAh

"Oppo R7 (2015) 16GB" and "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB", which has better CPU?

CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.

The "Oppo R7 (2015) 16GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm MSM8939 Snapdragon 615, with performance measured at 1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). Also, the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB"'s CPU is a Mediatek MT6737, with performance measured at 1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "Oppo R7 (2015) 16GB" has considerably higher specs than the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB". In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the "Oppo R7 (2015) 16GB" is superior to the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB". If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the "Oppo R7 (2015) 16GB" over the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB".

ScoreCPU specs
Oppo R7 (2015) 16GB61/1001.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores)
Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB39/1001.4GHz×4(4.0-cores)

"Oppo R7 (2015) 16GB" and "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?

RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.

The weight of the "Oppo R7 (2015) 16GB" is 3.0GB and the weight of the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" is 2.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "Oppo R7 (2015) 16GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB", with a difference of about 1GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "Oppo R7 (2015) 16GB" is superior to the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "Oppo R7 (2015) 16GB" over the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB".

ScoreRAM size
Oppo R7 (2015) 16GB60/1003.0GB
Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB50/1002.0GB

"Oppo R7 (2015) 16GB" and "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB", which has more data storage?

Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.

The data storage capacity of the "Oppo R7 (2015) 16GB" is 16.0GB. Also the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" is 16.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, there is a negligible difference in storage capacity between the "Oppo R7 (2015) 16GB" and "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB". As a result, you can save roughly the same amount of pictures, and install roughly the same amount of applications, on either phone. You are better off comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreStorage size
Oppo R7 (2015) 16GB50/10016.0GB
Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB50/10016.0GB

"Oppo R7 (2015) 16GB" and "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"Oppo R7 (2015) 16GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Also, "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" has a 8.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Oppo R7 (2015) 16GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB", with a roughly 5MP difference. In terms of taking or shooting high resolution pictures or videos that will look clean when printed, the "Oppo R7 (2015) 16GB" is superior to the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting videos and taking pictures, we recommend the "Oppo R7 (2015) 16GB" over the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB".

ScoreRear-camera resolution
Oppo R7 (2015) 16GB61/10013.0MP
Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB50/1008.0MP

"Oppo R7 (2015) 16GB" and "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"Oppo R7 (2015) 16GB" has an 8.0MP front camera and "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" has an 8.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Oppo R7 (2015) 16GB" and "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" have approximately the same pixel count. As a result, they can both take pictures and shoot videos of roughly the same quality. Therefore, we recommend comparing the two based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreFront-camera resolution
Oppo R7 (2015) 16GB58/1008.0MP
Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB58/1008.0MP

"Oppo R7 (2015) 16GB" and "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB", performance comparison by specification sheet

Oppo R7 (2015) 16GBNokia 3 (2017) 16GB
ImageOppo R7 (2015) 16GBNokia 3 (2017) 16GB
MakerOppoNokia
Release date2015-052017-06
ColorGolden/SilverSilver White/Matte Black/Tempered Blue/Copper White
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)71.0mm x 143.0mm x 6.3mm71.4mm x 143.4mm x 8.5mm
Weight147.0g140.0g
Display size5.0inch5.0inch
Display typeAMOLEDIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)1080 x 1920720 x 1280
Pixel density440ppi293ppi
Battery capacity2320.0mAh2630.0mAh
ChipsetQualcomm MSM8939 Snapdragon 615Mediatek MT6737
CPU specs1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores)1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size3.0GB2.0GB
Storage size16.0GB16.0GB
Rear-camera resolution13.0MP8.0MP
Front-camera resolution8.0MP8.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

Articles related to Oppo R7 (2015) 16GB
Articles related to Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB

Oppo R7 (2015) 16GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Oppo R7 (2015) 16GB

Articles related to Oppo R7 (2015) 16GB
Articles related to Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB

Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB

New articles