Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Which should you buy, the Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB or MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB? We offer a thorough comparison of the differences in functions, specifications and performance between the two

Created date: 2018-09-30 23:07:54, Updated date: 2020-04-15 18:38:50

Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GBMADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB
Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GBMADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB

Are you having trouble comparing the differences in features and performance of the "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB", or unsure about their differences in ease-of-use, and wondering which to buy? We did a deep-dive comparison of the features, specs, and capabilities of these two smartphone, and provided our rating of which one was a better buy.

Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GBMADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB
Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB

MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB

General rating:

41.3/100

(The 1705th of all smartphones)

44.5/100

(The 702th of all smartphones)

Holding comfort
65/100
70/100
Weight
72/100
80/100
Screen size
74/100
74/100
Display quality
25/100
59/100
Battery life
53/100
54/100
Processing power
13/100
14/100
Memory capacity
20/100
20/100
Storage capacity
50/100
24/100
Rear camera performance
50/100
50/100
Front camera performance
50/100
15/100

"Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB", performance comparison

"Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" size comparison. Which to choose?

The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.

The "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" has a width of 73.0mm, a length of 144.5mm, and a thickness of 8.6mm. Also, the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" has a width of 70.4mm, a length of 142.8mm, and a thickness of 8.4mm.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" is smaller and more compact compared to the "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB". For that reason, the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" is easier to grip firmly and carry one-handed than the "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB". For that reason, we recommend the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB".

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" and the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB". For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

Comparing the overall size of the two devices, there isn't a big difference in size between the "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" and the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB". For that reason the ease of carrying and use with one hand is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreDimensions (width x height x thickness)
Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB65/10073.0mm x 144.5mm x 8.6mm
MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB70/10070.4mm x 142.8mm x 8.4mm

"Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison

The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.

The weight of the "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" is about 144.0g, and the weight of the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" is about 125.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" is a lighter smart phone than the "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB", with a difference of about 19g. For that reason the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" is a smart phone that is less likely than the "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB"to put a burden on your fingers and wrist when used for an extended period. That's why we recommend the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" over the "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB".

ScoreWeight
Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB72/100144.0g
MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB80/100125.0g

"Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB", whose display is easier to use?

The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.

The "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" has a 5.0inch display. Also, the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" has a 5.0inch display. Comparing the screen size, there is a negligible difference in screen size between the "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" and the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB". As a result, the app buttons on both are equally easy to press. We recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreDisplay size
Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB74/1005.0inch
MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB74/1005.0inch

"Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB", which has a clearer display?

Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.

The resolution on the "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" is 480 x 854, and pixel density is 195ppi. Also, the resolution on the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" is 720 x 1280, and pixel density is 293ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" has much higher pixel density than the "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB", with a difference of roughly 98ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" is superior to the "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" over the "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB".

ScorePixel density
Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB25/100195ppi
MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB59/100293ppi

"Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB", a summary of the differences in battery life

Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.

The "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" is 2210.0mAh, and the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" is 2300.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, there is a negligible difference in battery capacity between the "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB". Since both have roughly equal battery life, you are better off comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreBattery capacity
Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB53/1002210.0mAh
MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB54/1002300.0mAh

"Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB", which has better CPU?

CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.

The "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB"'s CPU is a Mediatek MT6737M, with performance measured at 1.1GHz×4(4.0-cores). Also, the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"'s CPU is a Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, with performance measured at 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, there is almost no difference in the specs of the "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" and the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB". For that reason the level of smoothness felt when using apps and comfortable handling of games is about the same. For that reason it is better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreCPU specs
Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB13/1001.1GHz×4(4.0-cores)
MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB14/1001.2GHz×4(4.0-cores)

"Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?

RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.

The weight of the "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" is 1.0GB and the weight of the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" is 1.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, there is almost no difference in the amount of RAM of the "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" and the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB". For that reason they have about the same level of multitasking performance and 3D game and VR smoothness. That's why it is better to make a comparison in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreRAM size
Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB20/1001.0GB
MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB20/1001.0GB

"Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB", which has more data storage?

Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.

The data storage capacity of the "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" is 16.0GB. Also the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" is 8.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB", with a roughly 8GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" is superior to the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" over the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB".

ScoreStorage size
Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB50/10016.0GB
MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB24/1008.0GB

"Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" has a 8.0MP main camera. Also, "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" has a 8.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" have approximately the same pixel count. As a result, they can both take pictures and shoot videos of roughly the same quality. Therefore, we recommend comparing the two based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreRear-camera resolution
Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB50/1008.0MP
MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB50/1008.0MP

"Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" has an 5.0MP front camera and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" has an 2.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB", with a roughly 3MP difference. As a result, the "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" is more suited than the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" for shooting videos and taking pictures. If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting high resolution selfies which will look clean when printed, we recommend the "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" over the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB".

ScoreFront-camera resolution
Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB50/1005.0MP
MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB15/1002.0MP

"Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB", performance comparison by specification sheet

Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GBMADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB
ImagePanasonic P9 (2017) 16GBMADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB
MakerPanasonic
Release date2017-092015-12-04
OSAndroidWindows
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)73.0mm x 144.5mm x 8.6mm70.4mm x 142.8mm x 8.4mm
Weight144.0g125.0g
Display size5.0inch5.0inch
Display typeIPS LCDIPS
Screen resolution (width x height)480 x 854720 x 1280
Pixel density195ppi293ppi
Battery capacity2210.0mAh2300.0mAh
ChipsetMediatek MT6737MSnapdragon 410 MSM8916
CPU specs1.1GHz×4(4.0-cores)1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size1.0GB1.0GB
Storage size16.0GB8.0GB
Rear-camera resolution8.0MP8.0MP
Front-camera resolution5.0MP2.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

Articles related to Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB
Articles related to MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB

Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB

Articles related to Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB
Articles related to MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB

MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB

New articles