Should you buy Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB or Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB? Compare the differences in functions and specifications/performances thoroughly
Created date: 2018-09-30 23:20:14, Updated date: 2020-04-16 14:21:17
How did the evaluations between the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" differ when we compared the two? We reviewed each of the most commonly scrutinized features. If you are thinking about which smartphone to get, check out this review immediately!
Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB | Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB | |||
General rating: | 48.9/100 (The 1544th of all smartphones) | 73.8/100 (The 1019th of all smartphones) | ||
Holding comfort | 66/100 | 63/100 | ||
Weight | 69/100 | 54/100 | ||
Screen size | 74/100 | 90/100 | ||
Display quality | 36/100 | 88/100 | ||
Battery life | 59/100 | 72/100 | ||
Processing power | 39/100 | 91/100 | ||
Memory capacity | 50/100 | 90/100 | ||
Storage capacity | 50/100 | 91/100 | ||
Rear camera performance | 50/100 | 59/100 | ||
Front camera performance | 50/100 | 58/100 | ||
Contents
- 1."Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB", performance comparison
- 1-0."Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2."Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3."Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4."Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5."Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB", which has a clearer display?
- 1-6."Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB", whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7."Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB", which has more data storage?
- 1-8."Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9."Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB", which has better CPU?
- 1-10."Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2."Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
"Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB", performance comparison
"Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The "Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB" has a width of 72.3mm, a length of 143.8mm, and a thickness of 8.4mm. Also, the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" has a width of 73.8mm, a length of 158.1mm, and a thickness of 8.5mm.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't much difference between the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" in terms of size. For that reason, the ease of gripping and carrying the devices in one hand is about the same for both. Therefore it's better to compare them in terms of performance and functionality.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB" is a more compact size than the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB". For that reason the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB" has higher one-handed operability, and has greater portability, being less likely to get in the way when being carried. For these reasons, we recommend the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB".
Comparing the overall size of the two devices, there isn't a big difference in size between the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB" and the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB". For that reason the ease of carrying and use with one hand is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB | 66/100 | 72.3mm x 143.8mm x 8.4mm |
Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB | 63/100 | 73.8mm x 158.1mm x 8.5mm |
"Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
The weight of the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB" is about 153.0g, and the weight of the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" is about 189.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB" is a considerably lighter smart phone than the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB", and there is a difference of about 36g. In terms of the burden placed upon your fingers and wrist, the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB" is superior to the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB". If you are going for a smart phone that won't lead to hand fatigue even after extended use, and is less likely to place a burden on your fingers, we recommend purchasing the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB" over the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB".
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB | 69/100 | 153.0g |
Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB | 54/100 | 189.0g |
"Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB", whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The "Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB" has a 5.0inch display. Also, the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" has a 6.2inch display. Comparing the screen size, the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" has a considerably larger screen than the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB", with a difference of approximately 1.2inch. The "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" is superior to the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB" in terms of its larger buttons and the intensity of the user's experience when playing games and watching videos. In addition, the larger screen on the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" has the benefit of being easier on the user's eyes. If you are looking for a smartphone that you are less likely to mistap, offers a more intense viewing and gaming experience, and decreases eyestrain, then we recommend the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" over the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB".
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB | 74/100 | 5.0inch |
Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB | 90/100 | 6.2inch |
"Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB", which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB" is 540 x 960, and pixel density is 220ppi. Also, the resolution on the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" is 1440 x 2960, and pixel density is 530ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" has much higher pixel density than the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB", with a difference of roughly 310ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" is superior to the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" over the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB".
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB | 36/100 | 220ppi |
Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB | 88/100 | 530ppi |
"Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
The "Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB" is 2600.0mAh, and the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" is 3500.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" has greater battery capacity than the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB", with a 900mAh difference. Since the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" can be used for longer periods without recharging than the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB", it is great for outdoor use. If you want a smartphone with a longer battery life, we recommend the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" over the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB".
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB | 59/100 | 2600.0mAh |
Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB | 72/100 | 3500.0mAh |
"Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB", which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
The "Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm MSM8917 Snapdragon 425, with performance measured at 1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores). Also, the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB"'s CPU is a Exynos 9810, with performance measured at 2.7GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" has considerably higher specs than the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB". In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" is superior to the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB". If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" over the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB".
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB | 39/100 | 1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB | 91/100 | 2.7GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
"Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
The weight of the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB" is 2.0GB and the weight of the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" is 6.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB", with a difference of about 4GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" is superior to the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" over the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB".
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB | 50/100 | 2.0GB |
Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB | 90/100 | 6.0GB |
"Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB", which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB" is 16.0GB. Also the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" is 256.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB", with a roughly 240GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" is superior to the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" over the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB".
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB | 50/100 | 16.0GB |
Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB | 91/100 | 256.0GB |
"Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB" has a 8.0MP main camera. Also, "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" has a 12.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" has a higher pixel count than the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB", with a roughly 4MP difference. As a result, the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" is better able to take high quality landscape pictures than the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB", and the pictures will look cleaner when printed. Therefore, we recommend the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB".
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB | 50/100 | 8.0MP |
Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB | 59/100 | 12.0MP |
"Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB" has an 5.0MP front camera and "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" has an 8.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" has a higher pixel count than the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB", with a roughly 3MP difference. As a result, the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB" is better able to take high quality selfies than the "Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB", and the pictures will look cleaner when printed. Therefore, we recommend the "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB".
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB | 50/100 | 5.0MP |
Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB | 58/100 | 8.0MP |
"Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
Galaxy J2 Pro (2018) 16GB | Samsung Galaxy S9+ 256GB | |
Image | ||
Maker | Samsung | Samsung |
Release date | 2018-01 | 2018-03 |
Color | Black/Gold/Blue/Pink | Midnight Black/Coral Blue/Titanium Gray/Lilac Purple/Burgundy Red/Sunrise Gold/Ice Blue/Polaris Blue |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 72.3mm x 143.8mm x 8.4mm | 73.8mm x 158.1mm x 8.5mm |
Weight | 153.0g | 189.0g |
Display size | 5.0inch | 6.2inch |
Display type | Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 540 x 960 | 1440 x 2960 |
Pixel density | 220ppi | 530ppi |
Battery capacity | 2600.0mAh | 3500.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8917 Snapdragon 425 | Exynos 9810 |
CPU specs | 1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores) | 2.7GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 2.0GB | 6.0GB |
Storage size | 16.0GB | 256.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 12.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 5.0MP | 8.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |