Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB vs Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB: Which is the best?
Created date: 2018-09-30 22:14:04, Updated date: 2020-04-16 20:11:01
Here's our thorough comparison of the difference in performance and function between the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB". Which one should you buy? We'll compare and explain what differs between the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB" in a way that even people who aren't used to choosing between two similar products can understand.
Contents
- 1."Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB", performance comparison
- 1-0."Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2."Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3."Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4."Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5."Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB", which has a clearer display?
- 1-6."Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB", whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7."Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB", which has more data storage?
- 1-8."Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9."Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB", which has better CPU?
- 1-10."Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2."Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
"Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB", performance comparison
"Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" has a width of 71.0mm, a length of 142.3mm, and a thickness of 7.9mm. Also, the "Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB" has a width of 69.6mm, a length of 142.4mm, and a thickness of 7.9mm.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't much difference between the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB" in terms of size. For that reason, the ease of gripping and carrying the devices in one hand is about the same for both. Therefore it's better to compare them in terms of performance and functionality.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" and the "Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB". For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Comparing the overall size of the two devices, there isn't a big difference in size between the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" and the "Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB". For that reason the ease of carrying and use with one hand is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB | 69/100 | 71.0mm x 142.3mm x 7.9mm |
Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB | 72/100 | 69.6mm x 142.4mm x 7.9mm |
"Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
The weight of the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" is about 138.0g, and the weight of the "Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB" is about 152.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" is a lighter smart phone than the "Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB", with a difference of about 14g. For that reason the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" is a smart phone that is less likely than the "Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB"to put a burden on your fingers and wrist when used for an extended period. That's why we recommend the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" over the "Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB".
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB | 75/100 | 138.0g |
Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB | 69/100 | 152.0g |
"Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB", whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" has a 5.0inch display. Also, the "Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB" has a 5.1inch display. Comparing the screen size, there is a negligible difference in screen size between the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" and the "Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB". As a result, the app buttons on both are equally easy to press. We recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB | 74/100 | 5.0inch |
Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB | 75/100 | 5.1inch |
"Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB", which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" is 720 x 1280, and pixel density is 293ppi. Also, the resolution on the "Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB" is 1440 x 2560, and pixel density is 575ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB" has much higher pixel density than the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB", with a difference of roughly 282ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB" is superior to the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB" over the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB".
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB | 59/100 | 293ppi |
Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB | 89/100 | 575ppi |
"Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
The "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" is 2600.0mAh, and the "Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB" is 3000.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB" has greater battery capacity than the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB", with a 400mAh difference. If battery is a priority, then the "Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB" is recommended over the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB".
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB | 59/100 | 2600.0mAh |
Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB | 65/100 | 3000.0mAh |
Want to read it together
"Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB", which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
The "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB"'s CPU is a Spreadtrum SC9830,Exynos 3475 Quad, with performance measured at 1.5GHz×4(4.0-cores). Also, the "Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB"'s CPU is a Exynos 8890 Octa, with performance measured at 2.3GHz+1.6GHz×8(8.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB" has considerably higher specs than the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB". In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the "Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB" is superior to the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB". If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the "Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB" over the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB".
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB | 42/100 | 1.5GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB | 86/100 | 2.3GHz+1.6GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
"Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
The weight of the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" is 2.0GB and the weight of the "Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB" is 4.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB", with a difference of about 2GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB" is superior to the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB" over the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB".
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB | 50/100 | 2.0GB |
Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB | 70/100 | 4.0GB |
"Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB", which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" is 16.0GB. Also the "Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB" is 64.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB", with a roughly 48GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB" is superior to the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB" over the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB".
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB | 50/100 | 16.0GB |
Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB | 67/100 | 64.0GB |
"Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" has a 8.0MP main camera. Also, "Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB" has a 12.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB" has a higher pixel count than the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB", with a roughly 4MP difference. As a result, the "Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB" is better able to take high quality landscape pictures than the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB", and the pictures will look cleaner when printed. Therefore, we recommend the "Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB".
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB | 50/100 | 8.0MP |
Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB | 59/100 | 12.0MP |
"Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" has an 5.0MP front camera and "Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB" has an 5.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB" have approximately the same pixel count. As a result, they can both take pictures and shoot videos of roughly the same quality. Therefore, we recommend comparing the two based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB | 50/100 | 5.0MP |
Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB | 50/100 | 5.0MP |
"Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
Galaxy J3 (2016) 16GB | Samsung Galaxy S7 64GB | |
Image | ||
Maker | Samsung | Samsung |
Release date | 2016-01 | 2016-03 |
Color | White/Black/Gold | Black/White/Gold/Silver/Pink Gold |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 71.0mm x 142.3mm x 7.9mm | 69.6mm x 142.4mm x 7.9mm |
Weight | 138.0g | 152.0g |
Display size | 5.0inch | 5.1inch |
Display type | Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1280 | 1440 x 2560 |
Pixel density | 293ppi | 575ppi |
Battery capacity | 2600.0mAh | 3000.0mAh |
Chipset | Spreadtrum SC9830,Exynos 3475 Quad | Exynos 8890 Octa |
CPU specs | 1.5GHz×4(4.0-cores) | 2.3GHz+1.6GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 2.0GB | 4.0GB |
Storage size | 16.0GB | 64.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 12.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 5.0MP | 5.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |