Should you buy Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB or Yamada EveryPhone ME? Compare the differences in functions and specifications/performances thoroughly
Created date: 2018-09-30 21:15:02, Updated date: 2021-10-20 20:49:35
Are you having trouble comparing the differences in features and performance of the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "Yamada EveryPhone ME", or unsure about their differences in ease-of-use, and wondering which to buy? We did a deep-dive comparison of the features, specs, and capabilities of these two smartphone, and provided our rating of which one was a better buy.
Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB | Yamada EveryPhone ME | |||
General rating: | 56.4/100 (The 1364th of all smartphones) | 53.6/100 (The 512th of all smartphones) | ||
Portability | 54/100 | 68/100 | ||
Weight | 63/100 | 64/100 | ||
Size of screen | 85/100 | 74/100 | ||
Screen clarity | 81/100 | 59/100 | ||
Battery duration | 65/100 | 53/100 | ||
Processing capability | 73/100 | 36/100 | ||
Memory capacity | 60/100 | 50/100 | ||
Storage capacity | 55/100 | 50/100 | ||
Rear camera function | 61/100 | 50/100 | ||
Front camera function | 5/100 | 15/100 | ||
Contents
- 1.Compare Performance and Usability
- 1-0.Which one is easier to hold, "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" or "Yamada EveryPhone ME"? Compare weight
- 1-2.Size comparison of "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "Yamada EveryPhone ME". Which one would you choose?
- 1-3.Compare the rear cameras of "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "Yamada EveryPhone ME". Which one has better picture quality?
- 1-4.Which has a front camera with better picture quality, "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" or "Yamada EveryPhone ME"?
- 1-5.Which one has a better display, "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" or "Yamada EveryPhone ME"?
- 1-6.Which is better in terms of display, "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" or "Yamada EveryPhone ME"?
- 1-7.Which has a better storage capacity, "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" or "Yamada EveryPhone ME"?
- 1-8.How is "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" different from "Yamada EveryPhone ME" in terms of memory capacity?
- 1-9.Which is better in terms of CPU function, "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" or "Yamada EveryPhone ME"?
- 1-10.How is the battery duration of "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" different from that of "Yamada EveryPhone ME" ? See the differences
- 2.Compare Performance Specs
Compare Performance and Usability
Size comparison of "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "Yamada EveryPhone ME". Which one would you choose?
Your device's size has a huge influence on how easy it is to hold or to operate with one hand. The smaller your device's width, the easier it will be to hold, but you'll also need to take device thickness into account. And when the length and width are both smaller, you'll find that it's much easier for you to operate it one-handed, since your fingers will find it much easier to reach where you want them to. On the other hand, longer lengths and wider widths might lead to devices that are hard to carry in your pocket, bulky even when you keep them in your bag, and all around less portable.
The "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" is 79.0mm wide, 146.0mm tall, and 8.7mm thick. The "Yamada EveryPhone ME" is 72.0mm tall, 145.0mm wide, and 7.9mm thick.
The "Yamada EveryPhone ME" is also more compact than the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" in terms of the thickness of the devices. The "Yamada EveryPhone ME" is easier than the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" to hold with one hand, and you are less likely to accidentally drop it. If you're looking for a smartphone that fits nicely in your hand and can be gripped firmly, we recommend buying the "Yamada EveryPhone ME" rather than the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB".
There is no real difference in length or width between the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "Yamada EveryPhone ME", so they are both about the same in terms of usability, ease of carry, and bulkiness. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.
Comparing the overall size of the main unit, the "Yamada EveryPhone ME" is smaller than the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB". As a result, it is easier to use the "Yamada EveryPhone ME" with one hand compared to the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB", and its size makes it more comfortable to carry around. For this reason, the "Yamada EveryPhone ME" is recommended.
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB | 54/100 | 79.0mm x 146.0mm x 8.7mm |
Yamada EveryPhone ME | 68/100 | 72.0mm x 145.0mm x 7.9mm |
Which one is easier to hold, "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" or "Yamada EveryPhone ME"? Compare weight
The device weight will effect how quickly you tire from holding it, and how much stress is put on your wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you can hold it without feeling tired. Also, less stress on your wrist will make using it easier and more pleasant. Unless the weight is right for you, it might put too much strain on your body and make using it more stressful.
The "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" weighs 168.0g. The "Yamada EveryPhone ME" clocks in at 165.0g. The "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "Yamada EveryPhone ME" have around the same weight, so prolonged use will tire out fingers nd wrists to around the same degree. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB | 63/100 | 168.0g |
Yamada EveryPhone ME | 64/100 | 165.0g |
Which is better in terms of display, "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" or "Yamada EveryPhone ME"?
Screen size influences how well you can control your device, as well as how clear the display is. With a large screen, the text and buttons in apps will display large enough so you'll be less likely to accidentally tap the button next to the one you were aiming for. Plus, you'll be able to enjoy more high-impact visuals for games and movies.
The screen size on the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" is 5.7inch, and 5.0inch on the "Yamada EveryPhone ME". Comparing the sizes of the screens and displays, the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" is considerably larger than the "Yamada EveryPhone ME", with a difference of about 0.7inch. Compared to the "Yamada EveryPhone ME", the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" makes buttons in apps easier to press, and the visuals look more impressive in videos and games. The larger screen of the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" also has the advantage of being less tiring on the eyes. If you want to avoid tapping the wrong place, enjoy videos and games on a large screen, and not get tired eyes while using it, we recommend that you buy the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" rather than the "Yamada EveryPhone ME".
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB | 85/100 | 5.7inch |
Yamada EveryPhone ME | 74/100 | 5.0inch |
Which one has a better display, "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" or "Yamada EveryPhone ME"?
Pixel density influences how nice your device's screen looks, with high pixel densities making screens look more beautiful, and letting you get more out of your games and movies. Plus, the nicer you screen looks, the less strain you'll be putting on your eyes, so you'll tend to be able to use your device for longer before your eyes get tired.
The screen on the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" has a 1080 x 1920 resolution and a pixel density of 386ppi. The "Yamada EveryPhone ME", on the other hand, has a screen resolution of 720 x 1280 and a pixel density of 293ppi. Comparing the screen definition, the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" has a much higher pixel density than the "Yamada EveryPhone ME", with a difference of about 93ppi. The screen on the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" is clear and crisp, and puts less strain on the eyes than that of the "Yamada EveryPhone ME". If you want to choose a smartphone that is gentle on your eyes with a display that shows text and images clearly, we recommend that you buy the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" rather than the "Yamada EveryPhone ME".
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB | 81/100 | 386ppi |
Yamada EveryPhone ME | 59/100 | 293ppi |
How is the battery duration of "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" different from that of "Yamada EveryPhone ME" ? See the differences
Battery performance has a big effect on the battery life of your device. However, a high battery capacity doesn't necessarily mean a long battery life. Rather, the rate of power consumption needs to be taken into consideration as well. The larger the screen and the higher the CPU performance, the higher the rate of power consumption on your battery.
The "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh, while the "Yamada EveryPhone ME" has a 2200.0mAh battery. With regards to battery performance, the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" has a substantially larger battery capacity than the "Yamada EveryPhone ME", with a difference of 800mAh. The "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" can be used without charging for a longer time than the "Yamada EveryPhone ME", so it can be used when out and about. If you want a smartphone with a longer-lasting battery, we recommend that you buy the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" rather than the "Yamada EveryPhone ME".
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB | 65/100 | 3000.0mAh |
Yamada EveryPhone ME | 53/100 | 2200.0mAh |
Which is better in terms of CPU function, "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" or "Yamada EveryPhone ME"?
Your CPU's speed will influence the processing power of the applications you run, and together with the number of cores in the CPU, as well as its clock frequency, will determine the processing power available for apps. The higher these performance factors, the smoother your games and apps will run. Conversely, if these factors are too low, your apps and games will be sluggish and struggle to run.
The "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" is equipped with a Qualcomm MSM8994 Snapdragon 810 processor, and its performance speed is 2.0GHz+1.5GHz×8(8.0-cores). The "Yamada EveryPhone ME" uses an MediaTek MT6737 CPU that performs at a speed of 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" has significantly higher specs than the "Yamada EveryPhone ME". The "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" proves to be more advanced than the "Yamada EveryPhone ME" in the way that apps run quickly and games play smoothly. If you're looking for a high-spec smartphone that runs quickly and plays games smoothly, we recommend that you buy the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" rather than the "Yamada EveryPhone ME".
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB | 73/100 | 2.0GHz+1.5GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
Yamada EveryPhone ME | 36/100 | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
How is "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" different from "Yamada EveryPhone ME" in terms of memory capacity?
Your device's multimedia performance and app stability are both influenced by the amount of memory it has available. The more memory, the more apps you can use simultaneously, while keeping everything stable and smooth. Plus, there'll be less chance of animations lagging or apps crashing. You also need to keep in mind that some games won't run at all if there's not enough memory available.
The "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" has 3.0GB of memory. The "Yamada EveryPhone ME", on the other hand, has 2.0GB. As for memory performance, the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" has a larger memory capacity than the "Yamada EveryPhone ME", with a difference of about 1GB. The "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" has better multitasking, less crashing, and runs 3D games and VR video better than the "Yamada EveryPhone ME". If you're looking for a smartphone that will remain stable even when you are using multiple apps at the same time, and which will allow you to play 3D games and VR video comfortably, we recommend that you buy the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" rather than the "Yamada EveryPhone ME".
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB | 60/100 | 3.0GB |
Yamada EveryPhone ME | 50/100 | 2.0GB |
Which has a better storage capacity, "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" or "Yamada EveryPhone ME"?
Storage capacity determines the amount of data you'll be able to save on your device. The more storage you have, the more photos you can take and the more apps you can install. Plus, if your smartphone is compatible with SD cards, then you can increase the amount of available storage. However, SD cards have a slower writespeed, making them less desirable in terms of performance, and users should be aware that it won't be possible to transfer all kinds of data to the card.
The "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" has 32.0GB of storage, while the "Yamada EveryPhone ME" has 16.0GB. Comparing the ROM and storage capacity, the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" has a larger storage capacity compared to the "Yamada EveryPhone ME", with a difference of approximately 16GB. Consequently, the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" can take more photos and videos than the "Yamada EveryPhone ME" and it is possible to install more applications on it. For this reason, the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" is recommended.
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB | 55/100 | 32.0GB |
Yamada EveryPhone ME | 50/100 | 16.0GB |
Read on the same page
Compare the rear cameras of "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "Yamada EveryPhone ME". Which one has better picture quality?
One factor in how well your rear camera (the camera on the back of your device) performs is its megapixel count. With a higher megapixel count, you'll be able to take photos with sharper detail, photos that stay clear and sharp even when printed.
The main camera on the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" has 13.0MP. The "Yamada EveryPhone ME" has 8.0MP. The rear-facing camera of the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" also has a higher pixel count than the "Yamada EveryPhone ME", with a difference of about 5MP. The "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" is more capable than the "Yamada EveryPhone ME" of taking high-definition photos and videos, and produces better results when printing out the photos you have taken. If you want a smartphone that is designed for video and photography, we recommend buying the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" rather than the "Yamada EveryPhone ME".
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB | 61/100 | 13.0MP |
Yamada EveryPhone ME | 50/100 | 8.0MP |
Which has a front camera with better picture quality, "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" or "Yamada EveryPhone ME"?
One indication of how well your forward facing camera (the camera on the same side as your device's screen) performs is how many megapixels it has. More megapixels means you'll be able to take photos with sharper detail, that still look amazing printed out.
The forward-facing camera on the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" has a resolution of 1.0MP. The "Yamada EveryPhone ME"'s has 2.0MP. The front-facing camera of the "Yamada EveryPhone ME" has a significantly higher number of pixels than the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB", with a difference of about 1MP. Therefore, the "Yamada EveryPhone ME" is more suitable for taking photos and videos than the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB". If you want to take and print high-quality selfies, we recommend buying the "Yamada EveryPhone ME" rather than the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB".
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB | 5/100 | 1.0MP |
Yamada EveryPhone ME | 15/100 | 2.0MP |
Compare Performance Specs
Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB | Yamada EveryPhone ME | |
Image | ||
Maker | Sharp | Yamada |
Release date | 2015-07 | 2017-04-28 |
Color | Black/White/Red | Black/Gold |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 79.0mm x 146.0mm x 8.7mm | 72.0mm x 145.0mm x 7.9mm |
Weight | 168.0g | 165.0g |
Display size | 5.7inch | 5.0inch |
Display type | S-PureLED | IPS |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 1920 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 386ppi | 293ppi |
Battery capacity | 3000.0mAh | 2200.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8994 Snapdragon 810 | MediaTek MT6737 |
CPU specs | 2.0GHz+1.5GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 3.0GB | 2.0GB |
Storage size | 32.0GB | 16.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 8.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 1.0MP | 2.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone |