Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Compare Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB vs Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB

Created date: 2018-09-30 22:20:25, Updated date: 2021-10-20 21:54:58

Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GBSharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB
Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GBSharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB

Are you having trouble comparing the differences in features and performance of the "Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB" and "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB", or unsure about their differences in ease-of-use, and wondering which to buy? We did a deep-dive comparison of the features, specs, and capabilities of these two smartphone, and provided our rating of which one was a better buy.

Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GBSharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB
Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB

Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB

General rating:

42.7/100

(The 1667th of all smartphones)

56.4/100

(The 1364th of all smartphones)

Holding comfort
68/100
54/100
Weight
48/100
63/100
Screen size
74/100
85/100
Display quality
59/100
81/100
Battery life
57/100
65/100
Processing power
31/100
73/100
Memory capacity
20/100
60/100
Storage capacity
24/100
55/100
Rear camera performance
50/100
61/100
Front camera performance
74/100
5/100

"Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB" and "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB", performance comparison

"Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB" and "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" size comparison. Which to choose?

The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.

The "Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB" has a width of 71.7mm, a length of 143.6mm, and a thickness of 8.3mm. Also, the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" has a width of 79.0mm, a length of 146.0mm, and a thickness of 8.7mm.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB". The "Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB" excels over the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB" over the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB".

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the "Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB" and the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB". For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

Comparing the overall size of the two devices, the "Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB" has a large size compared to the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB". For that reason the "Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB" is a size that is easier to use in one hand and comfortably carry than the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB". That's why we recommend the "Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB".

ScoreDimensions (width x height x thickness)
Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB68/10071.7mm x 143.6mm x 8.3mm
Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB54/10079.0mm x 146.0mm x 8.7mm

"Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB" and "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison

The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.

The weight of the "Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB" is about 210.0g, and the weight of the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" is about 168.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" is a considerably lighter smart phone than the "Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB", and there is a difference of about 42g. In terms of the burden placed upon your fingers and wrist, the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" is superior to the "Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB". If you are going for a smart phone that won't lead to hand fatigue even after extended use, and is less likely to place a burden on your fingers, we recommend purchasing the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" over the "Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB".

ScoreWeight
Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB48/100210.0g
Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB63/100168.0g

"Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB" and "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB", whose display is easier to use?

The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.

The "Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB" has a 5.0inch display. Also, the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" has a 5.7inch display. Comparing the screen size, the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" has a considerably larger screen than the "Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB", with a difference of approximately 0.7inch. The "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" is superior to the "Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB" in terms of its larger buttons and the intensity of the user's experience when playing games and watching videos. In addition, the larger screen on the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" has the benefit of being easier on the user's eyes. If you are looking for a smartphone that you are less likely to mistap, offers a more intense viewing and gaming experience, and decreases eyestrain, then we recommend the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" over the "Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB".

ScoreDisplay size
Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB74/1005.0inch
Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB85/1005.7inch

"Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB" and "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB", which has a clearer display?

Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.

The resolution on the "Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB" is 720 x 1280, and pixel density is 293ppi. Also, the resolution on the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" is 1080 x 1920, and pixel density is 386ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" has much higher pixel density than the "Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB", with a difference of roughly 93ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" is superior to the "Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" over the "Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB".

ScorePixel density
Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB59/100293ppi
Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB81/100386ppi

"Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB" and "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB", a summary of the differences in battery life

Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.

The "Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB" is 2500.0mAh, and the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" is 3000.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" has greater battery capacity than the "Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB", with a 500mAh difference. If battery is a priority, then the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" is recommended over the "Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB".

ScoreBattery capacity
Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB57/1002500.0mAh
Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB65/1003000.0mAh

"Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB" and "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB", which has better CPU?

CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.

The "Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB"'s CPU is a Mediatek MT6591, with performance measured at 1.5GHz×6(6.0-cores). Also, the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm MSM8994 Snapdragon 810, with performance measured at 2.0GHz+1.5GHz×8(8.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" has considerably higher specs than the "Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB". In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" is superior to the "Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB". If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" over the "Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB".

ScoreCPU specs
Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB31/1001.5GHz×6(6.0-cores)
Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB73/1002.0GHz+1.5GHz×8(8.0-cores)

"Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB" and "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?

RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.

The weight of the "Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB" is 1.0GB and the weight of the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" is 3.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB", with a difference of about 2GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" is superior to the "Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" over the "Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB".

ScoreRAM size
Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB20/1001.0GB
Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB60/1003.0GB

"Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB" and "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB", which has more data storage?

Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.

The data storage capacity of the "Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB" is 8.0GB. Also the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" is 32.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB", with a roughly 24GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" is superior to the "Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" over the "Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB".

ScoreStorage size
Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB24/1008.0GB
Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB55/10032.0GB

"Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB" and "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB" has a 8.0MP main camera. Also, "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB", with a roughly 5MP difference. In terms of taking or shooting high resolution pictures or videos that will look clean when printed, the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" is superior to the "Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting videos and taking pictures, we recommend the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" over the "Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB".

ScoreRear-camera resolution
Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB50/1008.0MP
Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB61/10013.0MP

"Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB" and "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB" has an 15.0MP front camera and "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" has an 1.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB", with a roughly 14MP difference. As a result, the "Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB" is more suited than the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" for shooting videos and taking pictures. If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting high resolution selfies which will look clean when printed, we recommend the "Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB" over the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB".

ScoreFront-camera resolution
Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB74/10015.0MP
Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB5/1001.0MP

"Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB" and "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB", performance comparison by specification sheet

Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GBSharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB
ImageSpice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GBSharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB
MakerSpiceSharp
Release date2014-072015-07
ColorWhite/SilverBlack/White/Red
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)71.7mm x 143.6mm x 8.3mm79.0mm x 146.0mm x 8.7mm
Weight210.0g168.0g
Display size5.0inch5.7inch
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 12801080 x 1920
Pixel density293ppi386ppi
Battery capacity2500.0mAh3000.0mAh
ChipsetMediatek MT6591Qualcomm MSM8994 Snapdragon 810
CPU specs1.5GHz×6(6.0-cores)2.0GHz+1.5GHz×8(8.0-cores)
RAM size1.0GB3.0GB
Storage size8.0GB32.0GB
Rear-camera resolution8.0MP13.0MP
Front-camera resolution15.0MP1.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

Articles related to Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB
Articles related to Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB

Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB

Articles related to Spice Stellar 526 (Mi-526) 8GB
Articles related to Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB

Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB

New articles