Should you buy vivo V7 (2017) 32GB or BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB? Compare the differences in functions and specifications/performances thoroughly
Created date: 2018-09-30 23:19:24, Updated date: 2020-04-16 15:01:46
Are you having trouble comparing the differences in features and performance of the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" and "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB", or unsure about their differences in ease-of-use, and wondering which to buy? We did a deep-dive comparison of the features, specs, and capabilities of these two smartphone, and provided our rating of which one was a better buy.
Contents
- 1.Compare Performance and Usability
- 1-0.Which one is easier to hold, "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" or "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB"? Compare weight
- 1-2.Size comparison of "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" and "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB". Which one would you choose?
- 1-3.Compare the rear cameras of "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" and "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB". Which one has better picture quality?
- 1-4.Which has a front camera with better picture quality, "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" or "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB"?
- 1-5.Which one has a better display, "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" or "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB"?
- 1-6.Which is better in terms of display, "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" or "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB"?
- 1-7.Which has a better storage capacity, "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" or "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB"?
- 1-8.How is "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" different from "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" in terms of memory capacity?
- 1-9.Which is better in terms of CPU function, "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" or "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB"?
- 1-10.How is the battery duration of "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" different from that of "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" ? See the differences
- 2.Compare Performance Specs
Compare Performance and Usability
Size comparison of "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" and "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB". Which one would you choose?
Your device's size has a huge influence on how easy it is to hold or to operate with one hand. The smaller your device's width, the easier it will be to hold, but you'll also need to take device thickness into account. And when the length and width are both smaller, you'll find that it's much easier for you to operate it one-handed, since your fingers will find it much easier to reach where you want them to. On the other hand, longer lengths and wider widths might lead to devices that are hard to carry in your pocket, bulky even when you keep them in your bag, and all around less portable.
The "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" is 72.8mm wide, 149.3mm tall, and 7.9mm thick. The "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" is 74.5mm tall, 147.0mm wide, and 9.3mm thick.
Comparing the width and thickness of the main unit, the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" is smaller and more compact compared to the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB". Therefore, it is easier to grip and hold the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" than the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB". For this reason, the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" is recommended.
There is no real difference in length or width between the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" and "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB", so they are both about the same in terms of usability, ease of carry, and bulkiness. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.
When comparing their sizes as a whole, there is no real difference between the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB"and "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB". Thus they are roughly the same in terms of ease of carry and one-handed use. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
vivo V7 (2017) 32GB | 66/100 | 72.8mm x 149.3mm x 7.9mm |
BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB | 61/100 | 74.5mm x 147.0mm x 9.3mm |
Which one is easier to hold, "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" or "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB"? Compare weight
The device weight will effect how quickly you tire from holding it, and how much stress is put on your wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you can hold it without feeling tired. Also, less stress on your wrist will make using it easier and more pleasant. Unless the weight is right for you, it might put too much strain on your body and make using it more stressful.
The "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" weighs 139.0g. The "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" clocks in at 142.0g. The "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" and "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" have around the same weight, so prolonged use will tire out fingers nd wrists to around the same degree. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
vivo V7 (2017) 32GB | 74/100 | 139.0g |
BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB | 73/100 | 142.0g |
Which is better in terms of display, "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" or "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB"?
Screen size influences how well you can control your device, as well as how clear the display is. With a large screen, the text and buttons in apps will display large enough so you'll be less likely to accidentally tap the button next to the one you were aiming for. Plus, you'll be able to enjoy more high-impact visuals for games and movies.
The screen size on the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" is 5.7inch, and 5.2inch on the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB". Comparing the size of the display and screen, the screen size of the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" is larger than that of the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB", with a difference of approximately 0.5inch. As a result, there will be unintended touches on the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" compared to the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" and it is possible to enjoy games and videos on a large screen. For this reason, the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" is recommended.
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
vivo V7 (2017) 32GB | 85/100 | 5.7inch |
BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB | 77/100 | 5.2inch |
Which one has a better display, "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" or "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB"?
Pixel density influences how nice your device's screen looks, with high pixel densities making screens look more beautiful, and letting you get more out of your games and movies. Plus, the nicer you screen looks, the less strain you'll be putting on your eyes, so you'll tend to be able to use your device for longer before your eyes get tired.
The screen on the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" has a 720 x 1440 resolution and a pixel density of 282ppi. The "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB", on the other hand, has a screen resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a pixel density of 423ppi. Comparing the screen definition, the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" has a much higher pixel density than the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB", with a difference of about 141ppi. The screen on the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" is clear and crisp, and puts less strain on the eyes than that of the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB". If you want to choose a smartphone that is gentle on your eyes with a display that shows text and images clearly, we recommend that you buy the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" rather than the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB".
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
vivo V7 (2017) 32GB | 57/100 | 282ppi |
BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB | 85/100 | 423ppi |
How is the battery duration of "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" different from that of "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" ? See the differences
Battery performance has a big effect on the battery life of your device. However, a high battery capacity doesn't necessarily mean a long battery life. Rather, the rate of power consumption needs to be taken into consideration as well. The larger the screen and the higher the CPU performance, the higher the rate of power consumption on your battery.
The "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh, while the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" has a 2500.0mAh battery. Regarding the battery performance, the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" has a larger battery capacity than the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB", with a difference of 500mAh. If you are choosing based on the battery, the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" is recommended over the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB".
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
vivo V7 (2017) 32GB | 65/100 | 3000.0mAh |
BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB | 57/100 | 2500.0mAh |
Which is better in terms of CPU function, "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" or "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB"?
Your CPU's speed will influence the processing power of the applications you run, and together with the number of cores in the CPU, as well as its clock frequency, will determine the processing power available for apps. The higher these performance factors, the smoother your games and apps will run. Conversely, if these factors are too low, your apps and games will be sluggish and struggle to run.
The "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" is equipped with a Qualcomm SDM450 Snapdragon 450 processor, and its performance speed is 1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). The "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" uses an Qualcomm MSM8939 Snapdragon 615 CPU that performs at a speed of 1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" has significantly higher specs than the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB". The "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" proves to be more advanced than the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" in the way that apps run quickly and games play smoothly. If you're looking for a high-spec smartphone that runs quickly and plays games smoothly, we recommend that you buy the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" rather than the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB".
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
vivo V7 (2017) 32GB | 88/100 | 1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB | 53/100 | 1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
How is "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" different from "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" in terms of memory capacity?
Your device's multimedia performance and app stability are both influenced by the amount of memory it has available. The more memory, the more apps you can use simultaneously, while keeping everything stable and smooth. Plus, there'll be less chance of animations lagging or apps crashing. You also need to keep in mind that some games won't run at all if there's not enough memory available.
The "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" has 4.0GB of memory. The "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB", on the other hand, has 2.0GB. As for memory performance, the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" has a larger memory capacity than the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB", with a difference of about 2GB. The "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" has better multitasking, less crashing, and runs 3D games and VR video better than the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB". If you're looking for a smartphone that will remain stable even when you are using multiple apps at the same time, and which will allow you to play 3D games and VR video comfortably, we recommend that you buy the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" rather than the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB".
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
vivo V7 (2017) 32GB | 70/100 | 4.0GB |
BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB | 50/100 | 2.0GB |
Which has a better storage capacity, "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" or "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB"?
Storage capacity determines the amount of data you'll be able to save on your device. The more storage you have, the more photos you can take and the more apps you can install. Plus, if your smartphone is compatible with SD cards, then you can increase the amount of available storage. However, SD cards have a slower writespeed, making them less desirable in terms of performance, and users should be aware that it won't be possible to transfer all kinds of data to the card.
The "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" has 32.0GB of storage, while the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" has 16.0GB. Comparing the ROM and storage capacity, the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" has a larger storage capacity compared to the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB", with a difference of approximately 16GB. Consequently, the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" can take more photos and videos than the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" and it is possible to install more applications on it. For this reason, the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" is recommended.
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
vivo V7 (2017) 32GB | 55/100 | 32.0GB |
BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB | 50/100 | 16.0GB |
Compare the rear cameras of "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" and "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB". Which one has better picture quality?
One factor in how well your rear camera (the camera on the back of your device) performs is its megapixel count. With a higher megapixel count, you'll be able to take photos with sharper detail, photos that stay clear and sharp even when printed.
The main camera on the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" has 16.0MP. The "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" has 13.0MP. Comparing the rear camera performance, the number of pixels of the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" is higher than the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB", with a difference of approximately 3MP. As a result, the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" can take higher quality scenery photos and make clear prints compared to the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB". Therefore, the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" is recommended.
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
vivo V7 (2017) 32GB | 68/100 | 16.0MP |
BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB | 61/100 | 13.0MP |
Which has a front camera with better picture quality, "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" or "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB"?
One indication of how well your forward facing camera (the camera on the same side as your device's screen) performs is how many megapixels it has. More megapixels means you'll be able to take photos with sharper detail, that still look amazing printed out.
The forward-facing camera on the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" has a resolution of 24.0MP. The "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB"'s has 8.0MP. The front-facing camera of the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" has a significantly higher number of pixels than the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB", with a difference of about 16MP. Therefore, the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" is more suitable for taking photos and videos than the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB". If you want to take and print high-quality selfies, we recommend buying the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" rather than the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB".
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
vivo V7 (2017) 32GB | 86/100 | 24.0MP |
BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB | 58/100 | 8.0MP |
Compare Performance Specs
vivo V7 (2017) 32GB | BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB | |
Image | ||
Maker | vivo | BenQ |
Release date | 2017-12 | 2015-05 |
Color | Champagne Gold/Matte Black/Energetic Blue | Glam Pink/Chic Gray |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 72.8mm x 149.3mm x 7.9mm | 74.5mm x 147.0mm x 9.3mm |
Weight | 139.0g | 142.0g |
Display size | 5.7inch | 5.2inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1440 | 1080 x 1920 |
Pixel density | 282ppi | 423ppi |
Battery capacity | 3000.0mAh | 2500.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm SDM450 Snapdragon 450 | Qualcomm MSM8939 Snapdragon 615 |
CPU specs | 1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 4.0GB | 2.0GB |
Storage size | 32.0GB | 16.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 16.0MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 24.0MP | 8.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |