Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Which should you buy, the vivo X20 (2017) 64GB or Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB? We offer a thorough comparison of the differences in functions, specifications and performance between the two

Created date: 2018-09-30 22:00:58, Updated date: 2020-04-16 20:24:00

vivo X20 (2017) 64GBGalaxy A7 (2016) 16GB
vivo X20 (2017) 64GBGalaxy A7 (2016) 16GB

Are you having trouble comparing the differences in features and performance of the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" and "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB", or unsure about their differences in ease-of-use, and wondering which to buy? We did a deep-dive comparison of the features, specs, and capabilities of these two smartphone, and provided our rating of which one was a better buy.

vivo X20 (2017) 64GBGalaxy A7 (2016) 16GB
vivo X20 (2017) 64GB

Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB

General rating:

68.3/100

(The 1080th of all smartphones)

57.8/100

(The 1324th of all smartphones)

Holding comfort
63/100
65/100
Weight
66/100
61/100
Screen size
90/100
82/100
Display quality
84/100
85/100
Battery life
68/100
69/100
Processing power
86/100
64/100
Memory capacity
70/100
60/100
Storage capacity
67/100
50/100
Rear camera performance
59/100
61/100
Front camera performance
70/100
50/100

"vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" and "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB", performance comparison

"vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" and "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB" size comparison. Which to choose?

The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.

The "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" has a width of 75.2mm, a length of 155.9mm, and a thickness of 7.2mm. Also, the "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB" has a width of 74.1mm, a length of 151.5mm, and a thickness of 7.3mm.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't much difference between the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" and "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB" in terms of size. For that reason, the ease of gripping and carrying the devices in one hand is about the same for both. Therefore it's better to compare them in terms of performance and functionality.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" and the "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB". For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

Comparing the overall size of the two devices, there isn't a big difference in size between the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" and the "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB". For that reason the ease of carrying and use with one hand is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreDimensions (width x height x thickness)
vivo X20 (2017) 64GB63/10075.2mm x 155.9mm x 7.2mm
Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB65/10074.1mm x 151.5mm x 7.3mm

"vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" and "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison

The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.

The weight of the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" is about 159.0g, and the weight of the "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB" is about 172.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" is a lighter smart phone than the "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB", with a difference of about 13g. For that reason the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" is a smart phone that is less likely than the "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB"to put a burden on your fingers and wrist when used for an extended period. That's why we recommend the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" over the "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB".

ScoreWeight
vivo X20 (2017) 64GB66/100159.0g
Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB61/100172.0g

"vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" and "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB", whose display is easier to use?

The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.

The "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" has a 6.01inch display. Also, the "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB" has a 5.5inch display. Comparing the screen size, the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" has a larger screen compared to the "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB", with a roughly 0.5inch difference. As a result, the user is less likely to mistap when using apps on the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" than on the "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB", and is also able to enjoy videos and games on a larger screen. Therefore, we recommend the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB".

ScoreDisplay size
vivo X20 (2017) 64GB90/1006.01inch
Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB82/1005.5inch

"vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" and "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB", which has a clearer display?

Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.

The resolution on the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" is 1080 x 2160, and pixel density is 401ppi. Also, the resolution on the "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB" is 1080 x 1920, and pixel density is 400ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the difference in pixel density between the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" and the "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB" is negligible. As a result, they are both evenly matched in terms of picture quality and easiness on the eyes. Therefore, we recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScorePixel density
vivo X20 (2017) 64GB84/100401ppi
Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB85/100400ppi

"vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" and "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB", a summary of the differences in battery life

Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.

The "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" is 3250.0mAh, and the "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB" is 3300.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, there is a negligible difference in battery capacity between the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" and "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB". Since both have roughly equal battery life, you are better off comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreBattery capacity
vivo X20 (2017) 64GB68/1003250.0mAh
Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB69/1003300.0mAh

"vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" and "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB", which has better CPU?

CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.

The "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660, with performance measured at 2.2GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). Also, the "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB"'s CPU is a Exynos 7580 Octa ,Qualcomm MSM8939 Snapdragon 615, with performance measured at 1.6GHz×8(8.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" has considerably higher specs than the "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB". In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" is superior to the "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB". If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" over the "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB".

ScoreCPU specs
vivo X20 (2017) 64GB86/1002.2GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores)
Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB64/1001.6GHz×8(8.0-cores)

"vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" and "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?

RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.

The weight of the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" is 4.0GB and the weight of the "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB" is 3.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB", with a difference of about 1GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" is superior to the "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" over the "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB".

ScoreRAM size
vivo X20 (2017) 64GB70/1004.0GB
Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB60/1003.0GB

"vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" and "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB", which has more data storage?

Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.

The data storage capacity of the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" is 64.0GB. Also the "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB" is 16.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB", with a roughly 48GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" is superior to the "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" over the "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB".

ScoreStorage size
vivo X20 (2017) 64GB67/10064.0GB
Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB50/10016.0GB

"vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" and "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" has a 12.0MP main camera. Also, "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" and "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB" have approximately the same pixel count. As a result, they can both take pictures and shoot videos of roughly the same quality. Therefore, we recommend comparing the two based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreRear-camera resolution
vivo X20 (2017) 64GB59/10012.0MP
Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB61/10013.0MP

"vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" and "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" has an 12.0MP front camera and "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB" has an 5.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB", with a roughly 7MP difference. As a result, the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" is more suited than the "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB" for shooting videos and taking pictures. If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting high resolution selfies which will look clean when printed, we recommend the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" over the "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB".

ScoreFront-camera resolution
vivo X20 (2017) 64GB70/10012.0MP
Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB50/1005.0MP

"vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" and "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB", performance comparison by specification sheet

vivo X20 (2017) 64GBGalaxy A7 (2016) 16GB
Imagevivo X20 (2017) 64GBGalaxy A7 (2016) 16GB
MakervivoSamsung
Release date2017-102015-12
ColorMatte Black/Black+Gold/Gold/Rose gold/Blue/PinkBlack/White/Gold/Pink
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)75.2mm x 155.9mm x 7.2mm74.1mm x 151.5mm x 7.3mm
Weight159.0g172.0g
Display size6.01inch5.5inch
Display typeSuper AMOLEDSuper AMOLED
Screen resolution (width x height)1080 x 21601080 x 1920
Pixel density401ppi400ppi
Battery capacity3250.0mAh3300.0mAh
ChipsetQualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660Exynos 7580 Octa ,Qualcomm MSM8939 Snapdragon 615
CPU specs2.2GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores)1.6GHz×8(8.0-cores)
RAM size4.0GB3.0GB
Storage size64.0GB16.0GB
Rear-camera resolution12.0MP13.0MP
Front-camera resolution12.0MP5.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

Articles related to vivo X20 (2017) 64GB
Articles related to Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB

vivo X20 (2017) 64GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as vivo X20 (2017) 64GB

Articles related to vivo X20 (2017) 64GB
Articles related to Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB

Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB

New articles