Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Should you buy vivo X9 (2016) 128GB or Galaxy Note FE 64GB? Compare the differences in functions and specifications/performances thoroughly

Created date: 2018-09-30 22:46:24, Updated date: 2020-04-16 19:18:46

vivo X9 (2016) 128GBGalaxy Note FE 64GB
vivo X9 (2016) 128GBGalaxy Note FE 64GB

Are you having trouble comparing the differences in features and performance of the "vivo X9 (2016) 128GB" and "Galaxy Note FE 64GB", or unsure about their differences in ease-of-use, and wondering which to buy? We did a deep-dive comparison of the features, specs, and capabilities of these two smartphone, and provided our rating of which one was a better buy.

vivo X9 (2016) 128GBGalaxy Note FE 64GB
vivo X9 (2016) 128GB

Galaxy Note FE 64GB

General rating:

69.9/100

(The 1055th of all smartphones)

70.2/100

(The 1048th of all smartphones)

Holding comfort
66/100
64/100
Weight
68/100
63/100
Screen size
82/100
85/100
Display quality
85/100
87/100
Battery life
65/100
68/100
Processing power
89/100
86/100
Memory capacity
70/100
70/100
Storage capacity
90/100
67/100
Rear camera performance
68/100
59/100
Front camera performance
81/100
50/100

"vivo X9 (2016) 128GB" and "Galaxy Note FE 64GB", performance comparison

"vivo X9 (2016) 128GB" and "Galaxy Note FE 64GB" size comparison. Which to choose?

The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.

The "vivo X9 (2016) 128GB" has a width of 74.0mm, a length of 152.6mm, and a thickness of 7.0mm. Also, the "Galaxy Note FE 64GB" has a width of 73.9mm, a length of 153.5mm, and a thickness of 7.9mm.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't much difference between the "vivo X9 (2016) 128GB" and "Galaxy Note FE 64GB" in terms of size. For that reason, the ease of gripping and carrying the devices in one hand is about the same for both. Therefore it's better to compare them in terms of performance and functionality.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the "vivo X9 (2016) 128GB" and the "Galaxy Note FE 64GB". For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

Comparing the overall size of the two devices, there isn't a big difference in size between the "vivo X9 (2016) 128GB" and the "Galaxy Note FE 64GB". For that reason the ease of carrying and use with one hand is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreDimensions (width x height x thickness)
vivo X9 (2016) 128GB66/10074.0mm x 152.6mm x 7.0mm
Galaxy Note FE 64GB64/10073.9mm x 153.5mm x 7.9mm

"vivo X9 (2016) 128GB" and "Galaxy Note FE 64GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison

The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.

The weight of the "vivo X9 (2016) 128GB" is about 154.0g, and the weight of the "Galaxy Note FE 64GB" is about 167.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "vivo X9 (2016) 128GB" is a lighter smart phone than the "Galaxy Note FE 64GB", with a difference of about 13g. For that reason the "vivo X9 (2016) 128GB" is a smart phone that is less likely than the "Galaxy Note FE 64GB"to put a burden on your fingers and wrist when used for an extended period. That's why we recommend the "vivo X9 (2016) 128GB" over the "Galaxy Note FE 64GB".

ScoreWeight
vivo X9 (2016) 128GB68/100154.0g
Galaxy Note FE 64GB63/100167.0g

"vivo X9 (2016) 128GB" and "Galaxy Note FE 64GB", whose display is easier to use?

The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.

The "vivo X9 (2016) 128GB" has a 5.5inch display. Also, the "Galaxy Note FE 64GB" has a 5.7inch display. Comparing the screen size, there is a negligible difference in screen size between the "vivo X9 (2016) 128GB" and the "Galaxy Note FE 64GB". As a result, the app buttons on both are equally easy to press. We recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreDisplay size
vivo X9 (2016) 128GB82/1005.5inch
Galaxy Note FE 64GB85/1005.7inch

"vivo X9 (2016) 128GB" and "Galaxy Note FE 64GB", which has a clearer display?

Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.

The resolution on the "vivo X9 (2016) 128GB" is 1080 x 1920, and pixel density is 400ppi. Also, the resolution on the "Galaxy Note FE 64GB" is 1440 x 2560, and pixel density is 515ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the difference in pixel density between the "vivo X9 (2016) 128GB" and the "Galaxy Note FE 64GB" is negligible. As a result, they are both evenly matched in terms of picture quality and easiness on the eyes. Therefore, we recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScorePixel density
vivo X9 (2016) 128GB85/100400ppi
Galaxy Note FE 64GB87/100515ppi

"vivo X9 (2016) 128GB" and "Galaxy Note FE 64GB", a summary of the differences in battery life

Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.

The "vivo X9 (2016) 128GB" is 3050.0mAh, and the "Galaxy Note FE 64GB" is 3200.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, there is a negligible difference in battery capacity between the "vivo X9 (2016) 128GB" and "Galaxy Note FE 64GB". Since both have roughly equal battery life, you are better off comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreBattery capacity
vivo X9 (2016) 128GB65/1003050.0mAh
Galaxy Note FE 64GB68/1003200.0mAh

"vivo X9 (2016) 128GB" and "Galaxy Note FE 64GB", which has better CPU?

CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.

The "vivo X9 (2016) 128GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm MSM8953 Snapdragon 625, with performance measured at 2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). Also, the "Galaxy Note FE 64GB"'s CPU is a Exynos 8890 Octa, with performance measured at 2.3GHz+1.6GHz×8(8.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, there is almost no difference in the specs of the "vivo X9 (2016) 128GB" and the "Galaxy Note FE 64GB". For that reason the level of smoothness felt when using apps and comfortable handling of games is about the same. For that reason it is better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreCPU specs
vivo X9 (2016) 128GB89/1002.0GHz×8(8.0-cores)
Galaxy Note FE 64GB86/1002.3GHz+1.6GHz×8(8.0-cores)

"vivo X9 (2016) 128GB" and "Galaxy Note FE 64GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?

RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.

The weight of the "vivo X9 (2016) 128GB" is 4.0GB and the weight of the "Galaxy Note FE 64GB" is 4.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, there is almost no difference in the amount of RAM of the "vivo X9 (2016) 128GB" and the "Galaxy Note FE 64GB". For that reason they have about the same level of multitasking performance and 3D game and VR smoothness. That's why it is better to make a comparison in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreRAM size
vivo X9 (2016) 128GB70/1004.0GB
Galaxy Note FE 64GB70/1004.0GB

"vivo X9 (2016) 128GB" and "Galaxy Note FE 64GB", which has more data storage?

Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.

The data storage capacity of the "vivo X9 (2016) 128GB" is 128.0GB. Also the "Galaxy Note FE 64GB" is 64.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "vivo X9 (2016) 128GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "Galaxy Note FE 64GB", with a roughly 64GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "vivo X9 (2016) 128GB" is superior to the "Galaxy Note FE 64GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "vivo X9 (2016) 128GB" over the "Galaxy Note FE 64GB".

ScoreStorage size
vivo X9 (2016) 128GB90/100128.0GB
Galaxy Note FE 64GB67/10064.0GB

"vivo X9 (2016) 128GB" and "Galaxy Note FE 64GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"vivo X9 (2016) 128GB" has a 16.0MP main camera. Also, "Galaxy Note FE 64GB" has a 12.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "vivo X9 (2016) 128GB" has a higher pixel count than the "Galaxy Note FE 64GB", with a roughly 4MP difference. As a result, the "vivo X9 (2016) 128GB" is better able to take high quality landscape pictures than the "Galaxy Note FE 64GB", and the pictures will look cleaner when printed. Therefore, we recommend the "vivo X9 (2016) 128GB".

ScoreRear-camera resolution
vivo X9 (2016) 128GB68/10016.0MP
Galaxy Note FE 64GB59/10012.0MP

"vivo X9 (2016) 128GB" and "Galaxy Note FE 64GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"vivo X9 (2016) 128GB" has an 20.0MP front camera and "Galaxy Note FE 64GB" has an 5.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "vivo X9 (2016) 128GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Galaxy Note FE 64GB", with a roughly 15MP difference. As a result, the "vivo X9 (2016) 128GB" is more suited than the "Galaxy Note FE 64GB" for shooting videos and taking pictures. If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting high resolution selfies which will look clean when printed, we recommend the "vivo X9 (2016) 128GB" over the "Galaxy Note FE 64GB".

ScoreFront-camera resolution
vivo X9 (2016) 128GB81/10020.0MP
Galaxy Note FE 64GB50/1005.0MP

"vivo X9 (2016) 128GB" and "Galaxy Note FE 64GB", performance comparison by specification sheet

vivo X9 (2016) 128GBGalaxy Note FE 64GB
Imagevivo X9 (2016) 128GBGalaxy Note FE 64GB
MakervivoSamsung
Release date2016-112017-07
ColorGold/Rose GoldBlack Onyx/Blue Coral/Gold Platinum/Silver Titanium
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)74.0mm x 152.6mm x 7.0mm73.9mm x 153.5mm x 7.9mm
Weight154.0g167.0g
Display size5.5inch5.7inch
Display typeSuper AMOLEDSuper AMOLED
Screen resolution (width x height)1080 x 19201440 x 2560
Pixel density400ppi515ppi
Battery capacity3050.0mAh3200.0mAh
ChipsetQualcomm MSM8953 Snapdragon 625Exynos 8890 Octa
CPU specs2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores)2.3GHz+1.6GHz×8(8.0-cores)
RAM size4.0GB4.0GB
Storage size128.0GB64.0GB
Rear-camera resolution16.0MP12.0MP
Front-camera resolution20.0MP5.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

Articles related to vivo X9 (2016) 128GB
Articles related to Galaxy Note FE 64GB

vivo X9 (2016) 128GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as vivo X9 (2016) 128GB

Articles related to vivo X9 (2016) 128GB
Articles related to Galaxy Note FE 64GB

Galaxy Note FE 64GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Galaxy Note FE 64GB

New articles