Vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB vs Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB: Full Comparison!
Created date: 2018-09-30 22:45:53, Updated date: 2020-04-16 15:54:36
Here's our thorough comparison of the difference in performance and function between the "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" and "Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB". Which one should you buy? We'll compare and explain what differs between the "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" and "Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB" in a way that even people who aren't used to choosing between two similar products can understand.
Contents
- 1.Compare Performance and Usability
- 1-0.Which one is easier to hold, "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" or "Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB"? Compare weight
- 1-2.Size comparison of "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" and "Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB". Which one would you choose?
- 1-3.Compare the rear cameras of "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" and "Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB". Which one has better picture quality?
- 1-4.Which has a front camera with better picture quality, "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" or "Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB"?
- 1-5.Which one has a better display, "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" or "Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB"?
- 1-6.Which is better in terms of display, "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" or "Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB"?
- 1-7.Which has a better storage capacity, "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" or "Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB"?
- 1-8.How is "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" different from "Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB" in terms of memory capacity?
- 1-9.Which is better in terms of CPU function, "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" or "Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB"?
- 1-10.How is the battery duration of "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" different from that of "Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB" ? See the differences
- 2.Compare Performance Specs
Compare Performance and Usability
Size comparison of "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" and "Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB". Which one would you choose?
Your device's size has a huge influence on how easy it is to hold or to operate with one hand. The smaller your device's width, the easier it will be to hold, but you'll also need to take device thickness into account. And when the length and width are both smaller, you'll find that it's much easier for you to operate it one-handed, since your fingers will find it much easier to reach where you want them to. On the other hand, longer lengths and wider widths might lead to devices that are hard to carry in your pocket, bulky even when you keep them in your bag, and all around less portable.
The "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" is 76.2mm wide, 153.5mm tall, and 7.6mm thick. The "Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB" is 73.0mm tall, 160.0mm wide, and 8.3mm thick.
There is no real difference between the "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" and "Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB" when comparing their width, thickness, and slimness; they are both around the same in terms of one-handed ease of use and carry. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.
There is no real difference in length or width between the "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" and "Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB", so they are both about the same in terms of usability, ease of carry, and bulkiness. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.
When comparing their sizes as a whole, there is no real difference between the "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB"and "Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB". Thus they are roughly the same in terms of ease of carry and one-handed use. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB | 61/100 | 76.2mm x 153.5mm x 7.6mm |
Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB | 65/100 | 73.0mm x 160.0mm x 8.3mm |
Which one is easier to hold, "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" or "Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB"? Compare weight
The device weight will effect how quickly you tire from holding it, and how much stress is put on your wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you can hold it without feeling tired. Also, less stress on your wrist will make using it easier and more pleasant. Unless the weight is right for you, it might put too much strain on your body and make using it more stressful.
The "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" weighs 167.8g. The "Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB" clocks in at 173.0g. The "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" and "Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB" have around the same weight, so prolonged use will tire out fingers nd wrists to around the same degree. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB | 63/100 | 167.8g |
Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB | 61/100 | 173.0g |
Which is better in terms of display, "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" or "Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB"?
Screen size influences how well you can control your device, as well as how clear the display is. With a large screen, the text and buttons in apps will display large enough so you'll be less likely to accidentally tap the button next to the one you were aiming for. Plus, you'll be able to enjoy more high-impact visuals for games and movies.
The screen size on the "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" is 5.43inch, and 6.2inch on the "Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB". Comparing the size of the display and screen, the screen size of the "Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB" is larger than that of the "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB", with a difference of approximately 0.77inch. As a result, there will be unintended touches on the "Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB" compared to the "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" and it is possible to enjoy games and videos on a large screen. For this reason, the "Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB" is recommended.
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB | 80/100 | 5.43inch |
Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB | 90/100 | 6.2inch |
Which one has a better display, "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" or "Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB"?
Pixel density influences how nice your device's screen looks, with high pixel densities making screens look more beautiful, and letting you get more out of your games and movies. Plus, the nicer you screen looks, the less strain you'll be putting on your eyes, so you'll tend to be able to use your device for longer before your eyes get tired.
The screen on the "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" has a 1440 x 2560 resolution and a pixel density of 540ppi. The "Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB", on the other hand, has a screen resolution of 1440 x 2960 and a pixel density of 530ppi. There is not much of a difference in the pixel resolutions of the "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" and "Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB", so they are about the same in terms of clarity of image and gentleness on the eyes. For this reason it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB | 88/100 | 540ppi |
Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB | 88/100 | 530ppi |
How is the battery duration of "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" different from that of "Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB" ? See the differences
Battery performance has a big effect on the battery life of your device. However, a high battery capacity doesn't necessarily mean a long battery life. Rather, the rate of power consumption needs to be taken into consideration as well. The larger the screen and the higher the CPU performance, the higher the rate of power consumption on your battery.
The "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" has a battery capacity of 3600.0mAh, while the "Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB" has a 3500.0mAh battery. The batteries of both the "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" and "Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB" perform to the same extent. There is also no difference in the battery capacities of the "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" and the "Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB". Since their battery life is practically identical, it would be better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB | 74/100 | 3600.0mAh |
Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB | 72/100 | 3500.0mAh |
Which is better in terms of CPU function, "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" or "Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB"?
Your CPU's speed will influence the processing power of the applications you run, and together with the number of cores in the CPU, as well as its clock frequency, will determine the processing power available for apps. The higher these performance factors, the smoother your games and apps will run. Conversely, if these factors are too low, your apps and games will be sluggish and struggle to run.
The "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" is equipped with a Qualcomm MSM8976 Snapdragon 652 processor, and its performance speed is 1.8GHz+1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores). The "Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB" uses an Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 CPU that performs at a speed of 2.6GHz×8(8.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB" has significantly higher specs than the "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB". The "Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB" proves to be more advanced than the "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" in the way that apps run quickly and games play smoothly. If you're looking for a high-spec smartphone that runs quickly and plays games smoothly, we recommend that you buy the "Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB" rather than the "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB".
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB | 75/100 | 1.8GHz+1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB | 88/100 | 2.6GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
How is "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" different from "Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB" in terms of memory capacity?
Your device's multimedia performance and app stability are both influenced by the amount of memory it has available. The more memory, the more apps you can use simultaneously, while keeping everything stable and smooth. Plus, there'll be less chance of animations lagging or apps crashing. You also need to keep in mind that some games won't run at all if there's not enough memory available.
The "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" has 4.0GB of memory. The "Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB", on the other hand, has 4.0GB. Memory performance is roughly the same for both the "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" and "Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB"; as a result, multitasking, playing 3D games, and using VR feels the same on both devices. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB | 70/100 | 4.0GB |
Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB | 70/100 | 4.0GB |
Which has a better storage capacity, "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" or "Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB"?
Storage capacity determines the amount of data you'll be able to save on your device. The more storage you have, the more photos you can take and the more apps you can install. Plus, if your smartphone is compatible with SD cards, then you can increase the amount of available storage. However, SD cards have a slower writespeed, making them less desirable in terms of performance, and users should be aware that it won't be possible to transfer all kinds of data to the card.
The "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" has 128.0GB of storage, while the "Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB" has 64.0GB. In terms of ROM and data storage, the "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" has a much larger capacity than the "Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB", with a difference of about 64GB. The "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" can save more photos and keep more apps installed than the "Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB". If you're searching for a smartphone that can store more data, we recommended that you buy the "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" rather than the "Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB".
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB | 90/100 | 128.0GB |
Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB | 67/100 | 64.0GB |
Compare the rear cameras of "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" and "Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB". Which one has better picture quality?
One factor in how well your rear camera (the camera on the back of your device) performs is its megapixel count. With a higher megapixel count, you'll be able to take photos with sharper detail, photos that stay clear and sharp even when printed.
The main camera on the "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" has 16.0MP. The "Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB" has 12.2MP. Comparing the rear camera performance, the number of pixels of the "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" is higher than the "Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB", with a difference of approximately 3.8MP. As a result, the "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" can take higher quality scenery photos and make clear prints compared to the "Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB". Therefore, the "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" is recommended.
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB | 68/100 | 16.0MP |
Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB | 59/100 | 12.2MP |
Which has a front camera with better picture quality, "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" or "Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB"?
One indication of how well your forward facing camera (the camera on the same side as your device's screen) performs is how many megapixels it has. More megapixels means you'll be able to take photos with sharper detail, that still look amazing printed out.
The forward-facing camera on the "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" has a resolution of 8.0MP. The "Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB"'s has 8.0MP. There is little difference between the camera capabilities and the pixel density of the "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" and "Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB"'s front facing cameras, so the quality of photographs and video footage is virtually the same. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB | 58/100 | 8.0MP |
Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB | 58/100 | 8.0MP |
Compare Performance Specs
vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB | Galaxy S8+ SC-03J docomo 64GB | |
Image | ||
Maker | vivo | |
Release date | 2016-03 | 2017-06-08 |
Color | Silver/Gold/Rose Gold | Midnight Black/Arctic Silver |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 76.2mm x 153.5mm x 7.6mm | 73.0mm x 160.0mm x 8.3mm |
Weight | 167.8g | 173.0g |
Display size | 5.43inch | 6.2inch |
Display type | Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1440 x 2560 | 1440 x 2960 |
Pixel density | 540ppi | 530ppi |
Battery capacity | 3600.0mAh | 3500.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8976 Snapdragon 652 | Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 |
CPU specs | 1.8GHz+1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 2.6GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 4.0GB | 4.0GB |
Storage size | 128.0GB | 64.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 16.0MP | 12.2MP |
Front-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 8.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |