Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Compare vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB vs vivo X6S (2016) 64GB

Created date: 2018-09-30 22:18:05, Updated date: 2020-04-16 15:56:25

vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GBvivo X6S (2016) 64GB
vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GBvivo X6S (2016) 64GB

Are you having trouble comparing the differences in features and performance of the "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" and "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB", or unsure about their differences in ease-of-use, and wondering which to buy? We did a deep-dive comparison of the features, specs, and capabilities of these two smartphone, and provided our rating of which one was a better buy.

vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GBvivo X6S (2016) 64GB
vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB

vivo X6S (2016) 64GB

General rating:

67.2/100

(The 1109th of all smartphones)

62.5/100

(The 1209th of all smartphones)

Holding comfort
61/100
67/100
Weight
63/100
74/100
Screen size
80/100
77/100
Display quality
88/100
85/100
Battery life
74/100
56/100
Processing power
75/100
75/100
Memory capacity
70/100
70/100
Storage capacity
90/100
67/100
Rear camera performance
68/100
61/100
Front camera performance
58/100
58/100

"vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" and "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB", performance comparison

"vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" and "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" size comparison. Which to choose?

The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.

The "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" has a width of 76.2mm, a length of 153.5mm, and a thickness of 7.6mm. Also, the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" has a width of 73.8mm, a length of 147.9mm, and a thickness of 6.7mm.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" is smaller and more compact compared to the "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB". For that reason, the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" is easier to grip firmly and carry one-handed than the "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB". For that reason, we recommend the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB".

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" and the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB". For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

Comparing the overall size of the two devices, there isn't a big difference in size between the "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" and the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB". For that reason the ease of carrying and use with one hand is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreDimensions (width x height x thickness)
vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB61/10076.2mm x 153.5mm x 7.6mm
vivo X6S (2016) 64GB67/10073.8mm x 147.9mm x 6.7mm

"vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" and "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison

The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.

The weight of the "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" is about 167.8g, and the weight of the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" is about 140.5g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" is a considerably lighter smart phone than the "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB", and there is a difference of about 27.3g. In terms of the burden placed upon your fingers and wrist, the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" is superior to the "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB". If you are going for a smart phone that won't lead to hand fatigue even after extended use, and is less likely to place a burden on your fingers, we recommend purchasing the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" over the "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB".

ScoreWeight
vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB63/100167.8g
vivo X6S (2016) 64GB74/100140.5g

"vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" and "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB", whose display is easier to use?

The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.

The "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" has a 5.43inch display. Also, the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" has a 5.2inch display. Comparing the screen size, there is a negligible difference in screen size between the "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" and the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB". As a result, the app buttons on both are equally easy to press. We recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreDisplay size
vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB80/1005.43inch
vivo X6S (2016) 64GB77/1005.2inch

"vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" and "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB", which has a clearer display?

Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.

The resolution on the "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" is 1440 x 2560, and pixel density is 540ppi. Also, the resolution on the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" is 1080 x 1920, and pixel density is 423ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the difference in pixel density between the "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" and the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" is negligible. As a result, they are both evenly matched in terms of picture quality and easiness on the eyes. Therefore, we recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScorePixel density
vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB88/100540ppi
vivo X6S (2016) 64GB85/100423ppi

"vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" and "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB", a summary of the differences in battery life

Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.

The "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" is 3600.0mAh, and the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" is 2400.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" has greater battery capacity than the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB", with a 1200mAh difference. Since the "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" can be used for longer periods without recharging than the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB", it is great for outdoor use. If you want a smartphone with a longer battery life, we recommend the "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" over the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB".

ScoreBattery capacity
vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB74/1003600.0mAh
vivo X6S (2016) 64GB56/1002400.0mAh

"vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" and "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB", which has better CPU?

CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.

The "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm MSM8976 Snapdragon 652, with performance measured at 1.8GHz+1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores). Also, the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm MSM8976 Snapdragon 652, with performance measured at 1.8GHz+1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, there is almost no difference in the specs of the "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" and the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB". For that reason the level of smoothness felt when using apps and comfortable handling of games is about the same. For that reason it is better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreCPU specs
vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB75/1001.8GHz+1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores)
vivo X6S (2016) 64GB75/1001.8GHz+1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores)

"vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" and "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?

RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.

The weight of the "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" is 4.0GB and the weight of the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" is 4.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, there is almost no difference in the amount of RAM of the "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" and the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB". For that reason they have about the same level of multitasking performance and 3D game and VR smoothness. That's why it is better to make a comparison in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreRAM size
vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB70/1004.0GB
vivo X6S (2016) 64GB70/1004.0GB

"vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" and "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB", which has more data storage?

Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.

The data storage capacity of the "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" is 128.0GB. Also the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" is 64.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB", with a roughly 64GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" is superior to the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" over the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB".

ScoreStorage size
vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB90/100128.0GB
vivo X6S (2016) 64GB67/10064.0GB

"vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" and "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" has a 16.0MP main camera. Also, "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" has a higher pixel count than the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB", with a roughly 3MP difference. As a result, the "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" is better able to take high quality landscape pictures than the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB", and the pictures will look cleaner when printed. Therefore, we recommend the "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB".

ScoreRear-camera resolution
vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB68/10016.0MP
vivo X6S (2016) 64GB61/10013.0MP

"vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" and "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" has an 8.0MP front camera and "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" has an 8.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" and "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" have approximately the same pixel count. As a result, they can both take pictures and shoot videos of roughly the same quality. Therefore, we recommend comparing the two based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreFront-camera resolution
vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB58/1008.0MP
vivo X6S (2016) 64GB58/1008.0MP

"vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB" and "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB", performance comparison by specification sheet

vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GBvivo X6S (2016) 64GB
Imagevivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GBvivo X6S (2016) 64GB
Makervivovivo
Release date2016-032016-04
ColorSilver/Gold/Rose GoldSilver/Gold/Rose Gold
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)76.2mm x 153.5mm x 7.6mm73.8mm x 147.9mm x 6.7mm
Weight167.8g140.5g
Display size5.43inch5.2inch
Display typeSuper AMOLEDSuper AMOLED
Screen resolution (width x height)1440 x 25601080 x 1920
Pixel density540ppi423ppi
Battery capacity3600.0mAh2400.0mAh
ChipsetQualcomm MSM8976 Snapdragon 652Qualcomm MSM8976 Snapdragon 652
CPU specs1.8GHz+1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores)1.8GHz+1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores)
RAM size4.0GB4.0GB
Storage size128.0GB64.0GB
Rear-camera resolution16.0MP13.0MP
Front-camera resolution8.0MP8.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

Articles related to vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB
Articles related to vivo X6S (2016) 64GB

vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB

Articles related to vivo Xplay5 (2016) 128GB
Articles related to vivo X6S (2016) 64GB

vivo X6S (2016) 64GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as vivo X6S (2016) 64GB

New articles