Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Compare Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB vs Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB

Created date: 2018-09-30 22:28:01, Updated date: 2021-10-20 21:35:54

Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GBAllview P8 Energy Pro 64GB
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GBAllview P8 Energy Pro 64GB

Here's our thorough comparison of the difference in performance and function between the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB". Which one should you buy? We'll compare and explain what differs between the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB" in a way that even people who aren't used to choosing between two similar products can understand.

Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GBAllview P8 Energy Pro 64GB
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB

Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB

General rating:

54.1/100

(The 1416th of all smartphones)

55/100

(The 478th of all smartphones)

Holding comfort
57/100
50/100
Weight
63/100
48/100
Screen size
82/100
90/100
Display quality
53/100
77/100
Battery life
65/100
83/100
Processing power
50/100
69/100
Memory capacity
60/100
60/100
Storage capacity
55/100
67/100
Rear camera performance
61/100
61/100
Front camera performance
58/100
50/100

"Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB", performance comparison

"Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB" size comparison. Which to choose?

The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.

The "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" has a width of 77.5mm, a length of 153.5mm, and a thickness of 8.5mm. Also, the "Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB" has a width of 81.2mm, a length of 160.9mm, and a thickness of 8.4mm.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" is smaller and more compact compared to the "Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB". For that reason, the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" is easier to grip firmly and carry one-handed than the "Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB". For that reason, we recommend the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB".

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and the "Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB". For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

Comparing the overall size of the two devices, there isn't a big difference in size between the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and the "Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB". For that reason the ease of carrying and use with one hand is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreDimensions (width x height x thickness)
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB57/10077.5mm x 153.5mm x 8.5mm
Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB50/10081.2mm x 160.9mm x 8.4mm

"Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison

The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.

The weight of the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" is about 167.0g, and the weight of the "Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB" is about 209.8g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" is a considerably lighter smart phone than the "Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB", and there is a difference of about 42.8g. In terms of the burden placed upon your fingers and wrist, the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" is superior to the "Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB". If you are going for a smart phone that won't lead to hand fatigue even after extended use, and is less likely to place a burden on your fingers, we recommend purchasing the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" over the "Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB".

ScoreWeight
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB63/100167.0g
Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB48/100209.8g

"Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB", whose display is easier to use?

The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.

The "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" has a 5.5inch display. Also, the "Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB" has a 6.0inch display. Comparing the screen size, the "Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB" has a larger screen compared to the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB", with a roughly 0.5inch difference. As a result, the user is less likely to mistap when using apps on the "Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB" than on the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB", and is also able to enjoy videos and games on a larger screen. Therefore, we recommend the "Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB".

ScoreDisplay size
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB82/1005.5inch
Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB90/1006.0inch

"Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB", which has a clearer display?

Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.

The resolution on the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" is 720 x 1280, and pixel density is 267ppi. Also, the resolution on the "Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB" is 1080 x 1920, and pixel density is 367ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB" has much higher pixel density than the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB", with a difference of roughly 100ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB" is superior to the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB" over the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB".

ScorePixel density
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB53/100267ppi
Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB77/100367ppi

"Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB", a summary of the differences in battery life

Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.

The "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" is 3000.0mAh, and the "Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB" is 5020.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB" has greater battery capacity than the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB", with a 2020mAh difference. Since the "Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB" can be used for longer periods without recharging than the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB", it is great for outdoor use. If you want a smartphone with a longer battery life, we recommend the "Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB" over the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB".

ScoreBattery capacity
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB65/1003000.0mAh
Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB83/1005020.0mAh

"Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB", which has better CPU?

CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.

The "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB"'s CPU is a Cortex-A53, with performance measured at 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). Also, the "Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB"'s CPU is a Mediatek MT6753, with performance measured at 1.3GHz×8(8.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB" has considerably higher specs than the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB". In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the "Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB" is superior to the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB". If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the "Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB" over the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB".

ScoreCPU specs
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB50/1001.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)
Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB69/1001.3GHz×8(8.0-cores)

"Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?

RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.

The weight of the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" is 3.0GB and the weight of the "Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB" is 3.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, there is almost no difference in the amount of RAM of the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and the "Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB". For that reason they have about the same level of multitasking performance and 3D game and VR smoothness. That's why it is better to make a comparison in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreRAM size
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB60/1003.0GB
Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB60/1003.0GB

"Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB", which has more data storage?

Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.

The data storage capacity of the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" is 32.0GB. Also the "Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB" is 64.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB", with a roughly 32GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB" is superior to the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB" over the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB".

ScoreStorage size
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB55/10032.0GB
Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB67/10064.0GB

"Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Also, "Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB" have approximately the same pixel count. As a result, they can both take pictures and shoot videos of roughly the same quality. Therefore, we recommend comparing the two based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreRear-camera resolution
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB61/10013.0MP
Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB61/10013.0MP

"Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" has an 8.0MP front camera and "Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB" has an 5.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" has a higher pixel count than the "Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB", with a roughly 3MP difference. As a result, the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" is better able to take high quality selfies than the "Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB", and the pictures will look cleaner when printed. Therefore, we recommend the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB".

ScoreFront-camera resolution
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB58/1008.0MP
Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB50/1005.0MP

"Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB", performance comparison by specification sheet

Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GBAllview P8 Energy Pro 64GB
ImageWiko Upulse (2017) 32GBAllview P8 Energy Pro 64GB
MakerWikoAllview
ColorBlack/Gold/Deep Bleen/Cherry RedGold+Silver
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)77.5mm x 153.5mm x 8.5mm81.2mm x 160.9mm x 8.4mm
Weight167.0g209.8g
Display size5.5inch6.0inch
Display typeIPS LCDAMOLED
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 12801080 x 1920
Pixel density267ppi367ppi
Battery capacity3000.0mAh5020.0mAh
ChipsetCortex-A53Mediatek MT6753
CPU specs1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)1.3GHz×8(8.0-cores)
RAM size3.0GB3.0GB
Storage size32.0GB64.0GB
Rear-camera resolution13.0MP13.0MP
Front-camera resolution8.0MP5.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

Articles related to Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB
Articles related to Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB

Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB

Articles related to Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB
Articles related to Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB

Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Allview P8 Energy Pro 64GB

New articles