Compare Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB vs Google Pixel XL 128GB
Created date: 2018-09-30 22:29:11, Updated date: 2020-04-15 17:29:59
Are you having trouble comparing the differences in features and performance of the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Google Pixel XL 128GB", or unsure about their differences in ease-of-use, and wondering which to buy? We did a deep-dive comparison of the features, specs, and capabilities of these two smartphone, and provided our rating of which one was a better buy.
Contents
- 1."Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Google Pixel XL 128GB", performance comparison
- 1-0."Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Google Pixel XL 128GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2."Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Google Pixel XL 128GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3."Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Google Pixel XL 128GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4."Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Google Pixel XL 128GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5."Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Google Pixel XL 128GB", which has a clearer display?
- 1-6."Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Google Pixel XL 128GB", whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7."Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Google Pixel XL 128GB", which has more data storage?
- 1-8."Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Google Pixel XL 128GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9."Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Google Pixel XL 128GB", which has better CPU?
- 1-10."Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Google Pixel XL 128GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2."Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Google Pixel XL 128GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
"Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Google Pixel XL 128GB", performance comparison
"Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Google Pixel XL 128GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" has a width of 77.5mm, a length of 153.5mm, and a thickness of 8.5mm. Also, the "Google Pixel XL 128GB" has a width of 75.7mm, a length of 154.7mm, and a thickness of 8.5mm.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't much difference between the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Google Pixel XL 128GB" in terms of size. For that reason, the ease of gripping and carrying the devices in one hand is about the same for both. Therefore it's better to compare them in terms of performance and functionality.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and the "Google Pixel XL 128GB". For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Comparing the overall size of the two devices, there isn't a big difference in size between the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and the "Google Pixel XL 128GB". For that reason the ease of carrying and use with one hand is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB | 57/100 | 77.5mm x 153.5mm x 8.5mm |
Google Pixel XL 128GB | 60/100 | 75.7mm x 154.7mm x 8.5mm |
"Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Google Pixel XL 128GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
The weight of the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" is about 167.0g, and the weight of the "Google Pixel XL 128GB" is about 168.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, there isn't much difference in weight between the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Google Pixel XL 128GB". That's why the likelihood of fatigue in the fingers and wrists after extended use is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB | 63/100 | 167.0g |
Google Pixel XL 128GB | 63/100 | 168.0g |
"Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Google Pixel XL 128GB", whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" has a 5.5inch display. Also, the "Google Pixel XL 128GB" has a 5.5inch display. Comparing the screen size, there is a negligible difference in screen size between the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and the "Google Pixel XL 128GB". As a result, the app buttons on both are equally easy to press. We recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB | 82/100 | 5.5inch |
Google Pixel XL 128GB | 82/100 | 5.5inch |
"Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Google Pixel XL 128GB", which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" is 720 x 1280, and pixel density is 267ppi. Also, the resolution on the "Google Pixel XL 128GB" is 1440 x 2560, and pixel density is 534ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "Google Pixel XL 128GB" has much higher pixel density than the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB", with a difference of roughly 267ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "Google Pixel XL 128GB" is superior to the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "Google Pixel XL 128GB" over the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB".
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB | 53/100 | 267ppi |
Google Pixel XL 128GB | 88/100 | 534ppi |
"Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Google Pixel XL 128GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
The "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" is 3000.0mAh, and the "Google Pixel XL 128GB" is 3450.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "Google Pixel XL 128GB" has greater battery capacity than the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB", with a 450mAh difference. If battery is a priority, then the "Google Pixel XL 128GB" is recommended over the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB".
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB | 65/100 | 3000.0mAh |
Google Pixel XL 128GB | 71/100 | 3450.0mAh |
Want to read it together
"Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Google Pixel XL 128GB", which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
The "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB"'s CPU is a Cortex-A53, with performance measured at 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). Also, the "Google Pixel XL 128GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 821, with performance measured at 2.15GHz+1.6GHz×4(4.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "Google Pixel XL 128GB" has higher specs compared to the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB". For that reason, the "Google Pixel XL 128GB" allows for more comfortable use of apps, and games that run more smoothly. That's why we recommend the "Google Pixel XL 128GB" over the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB".
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB | 50/100 | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
Google Pixel XL 128GB | 57/100 | 2.15GHz+1.6GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
"Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Google Pixel XL 128GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
The weight of the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" is 3.0GB and the weight of the "Google Pixel XL 128GB" is 4.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "Google Pixel XL 128GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB", with a difference of about 1GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "Google Pixel XL 128GB" is superior to the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "Google Pixel XL 128GB" over the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB".
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB | 60/100 | 3.0GB |
Google Pixel XL 128GB | 70/100 | 4.0GB |
"Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Google Pixel XL 128GB", which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" is 32.0GB. Also the "Google Pixel XL 128GB" is 128.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "Google Pixel XL 128GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB", with a roughly 96GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "Google Pixel XL 128GB" is superior to the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "Google Pixel XL 128GB" over the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB".
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB | 55/100 | 32.0GB |
Google Pixel XL 128GB | 90/100 | 128.0GB |
"Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Google Pixel XL 128GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Also, "Google Pixel XL 128GB" has a 3.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Google Pixel XL 128GB", with a roughly 10MP difference. In terms of taking or shooting high resolution pictures or videos that will look clean when printed, the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" is superior to the "Google Pixel XL 128GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting videos and taking pictures, we recommend the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" over the "Google Pixel XL 128GB".
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB | 61/100 | 13.0MP |
Google Pixel XL 128GB | 12/100 | 3.0MP |
"Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Google Pixel XL 128GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" has an 8.0MP front camera and "Google Pixel XL 128GB" has an 8.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Google Pixel XL 128GB" have approximately the same pixel count. As a result, they can both take pictures and shoot videos of roughly the same quality. Therefore, we recommend comparing the two based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB | 58/100 | 8.0MP |
Google Pixel XL 128GB | 58/100 | 8.0MP |
"Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Google Pixel XL 128GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB | Google Pixel XL 128GB | |
Image | ||
Maker | Wiko | |
Color | Black/Gold/Deep Bleen/Cherry Red | Quite Black/Very Silver/Really Blue |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 77.5mm x 153.5mm x 8.5mm | 75.7mm x 154.7mm x 8.5mm |
Weight | 167.0g | 168.0g |
Display size | 5.5inch | 5.5inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1280 | 1440 x 2560 |
Pixel density | 267ppi | 534ppi |
Battery capacity | 3000.0mAh | 3450.0mAh |
Chipset | Cortex-A53 | Qualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 821 |
CPU specs | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) | 2.15GHz+1.6GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 3.0GB | 4.0GB |
Storage size | 32.0GB | 128.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 3.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 8.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |