Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB vs MADOSMA Q601 32GB

Created date: 2018-09-30 22:16:17, Updated date: 2022-06-02 14:16:47

Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GBMADOSMA Q601 32GB
Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GBMADOSMA Q601 32GB

How did the evaluations between the "Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB" and "MADOSMA Q601 32GB" differ when we compared the two? We reviewed each of the most commonly scrutinized features. If you are thinking about which smartphone to get, check out this review immediately!

Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GBMADOSMA Q601 32GB
Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB

MADOSMA Q601 32GB

General rating:
Holding comfortrating-image3.2
63/100
rating-image2.5
49/100
Weightrating-image3.3
65/100
rating-image3.0
59/100
Screen sizerating-image3.7
74/100
rating-image4.5
90/100
Display qualityrating-image1.3
25/100
rating-image3.9
77/100
Battery liferating-image2.9
57/100
rating-image3.9
78/100
Processing powerrating-image1.5
30/100
rating-image3.7
74/100
Memory capacityrating-image2.5
50/100
rating-image3.0
60/100
Storage capacityrating-image2.5
50/100
rating-image2.8
55/100
Rear camera performancerating-image2.5
50/100
rating-image3.1
61/100
Front camera performancerating-image2.5
50/100
rating-image2.5
50/100

"Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB" and "MADOSMA Q601 32GB", performance comparison

"Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB" and "MADOSMA Q601 32GB" size comparison. Which to choose?

The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.

The "Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB" has a width of 72.4mm, a length of 144.7mm, and a thickness of 10.1mm. Also, the "MADOSMA Q601 32GB" has a width of 83.2mm, a length of 160.0mm, and a thickness of 8.7mm.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "MADOSMA Q601 32GB". The "Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB" excels over the "MADOSMA Q601 32GB" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB" over the "MADOSMA Q601 32GB".

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB" is a more compact size than the "MADOSMA Q601 32GB". For that reason the "Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB" has higher one-handed operability, and has greater portability, being less likely to get in the way when being carried. For these reasons, we recommend the "Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB".

Comparing the overall size of the two devices, the "Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB" is a considerably larger size than the "MADOSMA Q601 32GB". In terms of being more convenient to use one-handed, and less likely to get in the way when you're not using it, the "Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB" is superior to the "MADOSMA Q601 32GB". If you're going for the smart phone sized to be easiest to carry and handle with one hand, we recommend buying the "Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB" over the "MADOSMA Q601 32GB".

ScoreDimensions (width x height x thickness)
Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB63/10072.4mm x 144.7mm x 10.1mm
MADOSMA Q601 32GB49/10083.2mm x 160.0mm x 8.7mm

"Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB" and "MADOSMA Q601 32GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison

The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.

The weight of the "Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB" is about 162.0g, and the weight of the "MADOSMA Q601 32GB" is about 176.5g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB" is a lighter smart phone than the "MADOSMA Q601 32GB", with a difference of about 14.5g. For that reason the "Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB" is a smart phone that is less likely than the "MADOSMA Q601 32GB"to put a burden on your fingers and wrist when used for an extended period. That's why we recommend the "Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB" over the "MADOSMA Q601 32GB".

ScoreWeight
Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB65/100162.0g
MADOSMA Q601 32GB59/100176.5g

"Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB" and "MADOSMA Q601 32GB", whose display is easier to use?

The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.

The "Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB" has a 5.0inch display. Also, the "MADOSMA Q601 32GB" has a 6.0inch display. Comparing the screen size, the "MADOSMA Q601 32GB" has a considerably larger screen than the "Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB", with a difference of approximately 1inch. The "MADOSMA Q601 32GB" is superior to the "Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB" in terms of its larger buttons and the intensity of the user's experience when playing games and watching videos. In addition, the larger screen on the "MADOSMA Q601 32GB" has the benefit of being easier on the user's eyes. If you are looking for a smartphone that you are less likely to mistap, offers a more intense viewing and gaming experience, and decreases eyestrain, then we recommend the "MADOSMA Q601 32GB" over the "Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB".

ScoreDisplay size
Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB74/1005.0inch
MADOSMA Q601 32GB90/1006.0inch

"Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB" and "MADOSMA Q601 32GB", which has a clearer display?

Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.

The resolution on the "Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB" is 480 x 854, and pixel density is 195ppi. Also, the resolution on the "MADOSMA Q601 32GB" is 1080 x 1920, and pixel density is 367ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "MADOSMA Q601 32GB" has much higher pixel density than the "Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB", with a difference of roughly 172ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "MADOSMA Q601 32GB" is superior to the "Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "MADOSMA Q601 32GB" over the "Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB".

ScorePixel density
Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB25/100195ppi
MADOSMA Q601 32GB77/100367ppi

"Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB" and "MADOSMA Q601 32GB", a summary of the differences in battery life

Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.

The "Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB" is 2500.0mAh, and the "MADOSMA Q601 32GB" is 3900.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "MADOSMA Q601 32GB" has greater battery capacity than the "Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB", with a 1400mAh difference. Since the "MADOSMA Q601 32GB" can be used for longer periods without recharging than the "Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB", it is great for outdoor use. If you want a smartphone with a longer battery life, we recommend the "MADOSMA Q601 32GB" over the "Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB".

ScoreBattery capacity
Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB57/1002500.0mAh
MADOSMA Q601 32GB78/1003900.0mAh

"Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB" and "MADOSMA Q601 32GB", which has better CPU?

CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.

Also, the "MADOSMA Q601 32GB"'s CPU is a Snapdragon 617 MSM8952, with performance measured at 1.5GHz×8(8.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "MADOSMA Q601 32GB" has considerably higher specs than the "Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB". In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the "MADOSMA Q601 32GB" is superior to the "Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB". If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the "MADOSMA Q601 32GB" over the "Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB".

ScoreCPU specs
Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB30/1001.1GHz×4(4.0-cores)
MADOSMA Q601 32GB74/1001.5GHz×8(8.0-cores)

"Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB" and "MADOSMA Q601 32GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?

RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.

The weight of the "Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB" is 2.0GB and the weight of the "MADOSMA Q601 32GB" is 3.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "MADOSMA Q601 32GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB", with a difference of about 1GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "MADOSMA Q601 32GB" is superior to the "Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "MADOSMA Q601 32GB" over the "Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB".

ScoreRAM size
Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB50/1002.0GB
MADOSMA Q601 32GB60/1003.0GB

"Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB" and "MADOSMA Q601 32GB", which has more data storage?

Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.

The data storage capacity of the "Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB" is 16.0GB. Also the "MADOSMA Q601 32GB" is 32.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "MADOSMA Q601 32GB" has a greater storage capacity compared to the "Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB", with a roughly 16GB difference. As a result, the "MADOSMA Q601 32GB" can take more pictures and videos, and have more applications installed, than the "Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB". Therefore, we recommend the "MADOSMA Q601 32GB".

ScoreStorage size
Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB50/10016.0GB
MADOSMA Q601 32GB55/10032.0GB

"Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB" and "MADOSMA Q601 32GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB" has a 8.0MP main camera. Also, "MADOSMA Q601 32GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "MADOSMA Q601 32GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB", with a roughly 5MP difference. In terms of taking or shooting high resolution pictures or videos that will look clean when printed, the "MADOSMA Q601 32GB" is superior to the "Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting videos and taking pictures, we recommend the "MADOSMA Q601 32GB" over the "Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB".

ScoreRear-camera resolution
Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB50/1008.0MP
MADOSMA Q601 32GB61/10013.0MP

"Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB" and "MADOSMA Q601 32GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB" has an 5.0MP front camera and "MADOSMA Q601 32GB" has an 5.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB" and "MADOSMA Q601 32GB" have approximately the same pixel count. As a result, they can both take pictures and shoot videos of roughly the same quality. Therefore, we recommend comparing the two based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreFront-camera resolution
Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB50/1005.0MP
MADOSMA Q601 32GB50/1005.0MP

"Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB" and "MADOSMA Q601 32GB", performance comparison by specification sheet

Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GBMADOSMA Q601 32GB
ImageWiko Kenny (2017) 16GBMADOSMA Q601 32GB
MakerWiko
OSAndroidWindows
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)72.4mm x 144.7mm x 10.1mm83.2mm x 160.0mm x 8.7mm
Weight162.0g176.5g
Display size5.0inch6.0inch
Display typeIPS LCDIPS
Screen resolution (width x height)480 x 8541080 x 1920
Pixel density195ppi367ppi
Battery capacity2500.0mAh3900.0mAh
CPU specs1.1GHz×4(4.0-cores)1.5GHz×8(8.0-cores)
RAM size2.0GB3.0GB
Storage size16.0GB32.0GB
Rear-camera resolution8.0MP13.0MP
Front-camera resolution5.0MP5.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

Articles related to Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB
Articles related to MADOSMA Q601 32GB

Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB

Articles related to Wiko Kenny (2017) 16GB
Articles related to MADOSMA Q601 32GB

MADOSMA Q601 32GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as MADOSMA Q601 32GB

New articles