Which is better, Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB or Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB? We compared their features and specs in detail
Created date: 2018-09-30 23:34:19, Updated date: 2020-04-15 22:37:14
Are you having trouble comparing the differences in features and performance of the "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB", or unsure about their differences in ease-of-use, and wondering which to buy? We did a deep-dive comparison of the features, specs, and capabilities of these two smartphone, and provided our rating of which one was a better buy.
Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB | Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB | |||
General rating: | 42.4/100 (The 1674th of all smartphones) | 54.1/100 (The 1416th of all smartphones) | ||
Holding comfort | 67/100 | 57/100 | ||
Weight | 64/100 | 63/100 | ||
Screen size | 74/100 | 82/100 | ||
Display quality | 59/100 | 53/100 | ||
Battery life | 57/100 | 65/100 | ||
Processing power | 16/100 | 50/100 | ||
Memory capacity | 20/100 | 60/100 | ||
Storage capacity | 24/100 | 55/100 | ||
Rear camera performance | 50/100 | 61/100 | ||
Front camera performance | 50/100 | 58/100 | ||
Contents
- 1."Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB", performance comparison
- 1-0."Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2."Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3."Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4."Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5."Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB", which has a clearer display?
- 1-6."Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB", whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7."Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB", which has more data storage?
- 1-8."Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9."Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB", which has better CPU?
- 1-10."Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2."Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
"Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB", performance comparison
"Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" has a width of 71.5mm, a length of 146.0mm, and a thickness of 8.8mm. Also, the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" has a width of 77.5mm, a length of 153.5mm, and a thickness of 8.5mm.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB". The "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" excels over the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" over the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB".
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" and the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB". For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Comparing the overall size of the two devices, the "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" has a large size compared to the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB". For that reason the "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" is a size that is easier to use in one hand and comfortably carry than the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB". That's why we recommend the "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB".
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB | 67/100 | 71.5mm x 146.0mm x 8.8mm |
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB | 57/100 | 77.5mm x 153.5mm x 8.5mm |
"Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
The weight of the "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" is about 165.0g, and the weight of the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" is about 167.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, there isn't much difference in weight between the "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB". That's why the likelihood of fatigue in the fingers and wrists after extended use is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB | 64/100 | 165.0g |
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB | 63/100 | 167.0g |
"Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB", whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" has a 5.0inch display. Also, the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" has a 5.5inch display. Comparing the screen size, the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" has a larger screen compared to the "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB", with a roughly 0.5inch difference. As a result, the user is less likely to mistap when using apps on the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" than on the "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB", and is also able to enjoy videos and games on a larger screen. Therefore, we recommend the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB".
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB | 74/100 | 5.0inch |
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB | 82/100 | 5.5inch |
"Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB", which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" is 720 x 1280, and pixel density is 293ppi. Also, the resolution on the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" is 720 x 1280, and pixel density is 267ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" has a higher pixel density than the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB", with a difference of roughly 26ppi. As a result, images and videos on the "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" have better picture quality than on the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB", and the former is also easier on the eyes. Therefore, we recommend the "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB".
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB | 59/100 | 293ppi |
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB | 53/100 | 267ppi |
"Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
The "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" is 2500.0mAh, and the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" is 3000.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" has greater battery capacity than the "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB", with a 500mAh difference. If battery is a priority, then the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" is recommended over the "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB".
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB | 57/100 | 2500.0mAh |
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB | 65/100 | 3000.0mAh |
Want to read it together
"Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB", which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
The "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm MSM8909v2 Snapdragon 212, with performance measured at 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). Also, the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB"'s CPU is a Cortex-A53, with performance measured at 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" has considerably higher specs than the "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB". In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" is superior to the "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB". If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" over the "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB".
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB | 16/100 | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB | 50/100 | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
"Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
The weight of the "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" is 1.0GB and the weight of the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" is 3.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB", with a difference of about 2GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" is superior to the "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" over the "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB".
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB | 20/100 | 1.0GB |
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB | 60/100 | 3.0GB |
"Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB", which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" is 8.0GB. Also the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" is 32.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB", with a roughly 24GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" is superior to the "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" over the "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB".
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB | 24/100 | 8.0GB |
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB | 55/100 | 32.0GB |
"Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" has a 8.0MP main camera. Also, "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB", with a roughly 5MP difference. In terms of taking or shooting high resolution pictures or videos that will look clean when printed, the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" is superior to the "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting videos and taking pictures, we recommend the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" over the "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB".
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB | 50/100 | 8.0MP |
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB | 61/100 | 13.0MP |
"Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" has an 5.0MP front camera and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" has an 8.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" has a higher pixel count than the "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB", with a roughly 3MP difference. As a result, the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" is better able to take high quality selfies than the "Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB", and the pictures will look cleaner when printed. Therefore, we recommend the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB".
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB | 50/100 | 5.0MP |
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB | 58/100 | 8.0MP |
"Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
Wiko Tommy (2016) 8GB | Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB | |
Image | ||
Maker | Wiko | Wiko |
Color | True Black/Flashy Red/Cool Grey/Bleen/Sun Yellow/Hot Pink | Black/Gold/Deep Bleen/Cherry Red |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 71.5mm x 146.0mm x 8.8mm | 77.5mm x 153.5mm x 8.5mm |
Weight | 165.0g | 167.0g |
Display size | 5.0inch | 5.5inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1280 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 293ppi | 267ppi |
Battery capacity | 2500.0mAh | 3000.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8909v2 Snapdragon 212 | Cortex-A53 |
CPU specs | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 1.0GB | 3.0GB |
Storage size | 8.0GB | 32.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 5.0MP | 8.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |