Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Which is better, ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB or AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB? We compared their features and specs in detail

Created date: 2018-09-30 22:32:59, Updated date: 2020-04-15 19:35:24

ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GBAQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GBAQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB

Are you having trouble comparing the differences in features and performance of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB", or unsure about their differences in ease-of-use, and wondering which to buy? We did a deep-dive comparison of the features, specs, and capabilities of these two smartphone, and provided our rating of which one was a better buy.

ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GBAQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB

General rating:

50.3/100

(The 1506th of all smartphones)

57.6/100

(The 398th of all smartphones)

Holding comfort
56/100
68/100
Weight
67/100
71/100
Screen size
82/100
77/100
Display quality
53/100
85/100
Battery life
65/100
59/100
Processing power
39/100
55/100
Memory capacity
50/100
50/100
Storage capacity
50/100
55/100
Rear camera performance
61/100
69/100
Front camera performance
50/100
6/100

"ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB", performance comparison

"ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB" size comparison. Which to choose?

The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.

The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has a width of 77.5mm, a length of 156.0mm, and a thickness of 8.9mm. Also, the "AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB" has a width of 70.0mm, a length of 132.0mm, and a thickness of 9.9mm.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB". The "AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB" excels over the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB" over the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB".

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB". The "AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB" excels over the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB" over the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB".

Comparing the overall size of the two devices, the "AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB" is a considerably larger size than the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB". In terms of being more convenient to use one-handed, and less likely to get in the way when you're not using it, the "AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB" is superior to the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB". If you're going for the smart phone sized to be easiest to carry and handle with one hand, we recommend buying the "AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB" over the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB".

ScoreDimensions (width x height x thickness)
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB56/10077.5mm x 156.0mm x 8.9mm
AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB68/10070.0mm x 132.0mm x 9.9mm

"ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison

The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.

The weight of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is about 156.0g, and the weight of the "AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB" is about 147.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, there isn't much difference in weight between the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB". That's why the likelihood of fatigue in the fingers and wrists after extended use is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreWeight
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB67/100156.0g
AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB71/100147.0g

"ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB", whose display is easier to use?

The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.

The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has a 5.5inch display. Also, the "AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB" has a 5.2inch display. Comparing the screen size, there is a negligible difference in screen size between the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and the "AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB". As a result, the app buttons on both are equally easy to press. We recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreDisplay size
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB82/1005.5inch
AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB77/1005.2inch

"ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB", which has a clearer display?

Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.

The resolution on the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is 720 x 1280, and pixel density is 267ppi. Also, the resolution on the "AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB" is 1080 x 1920, and pixel density is 423ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB" has much higher pixel density than the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB", with a difference of roughly 156ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB" is superior to the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB" over the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB".

ScorePixel density
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB53/100267ppi
AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB85/100423ppi

"ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB", a summary of the differences in battery life

Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.

The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is 3000.0mAh, and the "AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB" is 2600.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has greater battery capacity than the "AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB", with a 400mAh difference. If battery is a priority, then the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is recommended over the "AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB".

ScoreBattery capacity
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB65/1003000.0mAh
AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB59/1002600.0mAh

"ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB", which has better CPU?

CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.

The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm MSM8917 Snapdragon 425, with performance measured at 1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores). Also, the "AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB"'s CPU is a Snapdragon 800 MSM8974, with performance measured at 2.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB" has considerably higher specs than the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB". In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the "AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB" is superior to the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB". If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the "AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB" over the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB".

ScoreCPU specs
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB39/1001.4GHz×4(4.0-cores)
AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB55/1002.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)

"ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?

RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.

The weight of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is 2.0GB and the weight of the "AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB" is 2.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, there is almost no difference in the amount of RAM of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and the "AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB". For that reason they have about the same level of multitasking performance and 3D game and VR smoothness. That's why it is better to make a comparison in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreRAM size
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB50/1002.0GB
AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB50/1002.0GB

"ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB", which has more data storage?

Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.

The data storage capacity of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is 16.0GB. Also the "AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB" is 32.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB" has a greater storage capacity compared to the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB", with a roughly 16GB difference. As a result, the "AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB" can take more pictures and videos, and have more applications installed, than the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB". Therefore, we recommend the "AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB".

ScoreStorage size
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB50/10016.0GB
AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB55/10032.0GB

"ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Also, "AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB" has a 16.3MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB" has a higher pixel count than the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB", with a roughly 3.3MP difference. As a result, the "AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB" is better able to take high quality landscape pictures than the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB", and the pictures will look cleaner when printed. Therefore, we recommend the "AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB".

ScoreRear-camera resolution
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB61/10013.0MP
AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB69/10016.3MP

"ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has an 5.0MP front camera and "AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB" has an 1.2MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB", with a roughly 3.8MP difference. As a result, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is more suited than the "AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB" for shooting videos and taking pictures. If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting high resolution selfies which will look clean when printed, we recommend the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" over the "AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB".

ScoreFront-camera resolution
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB50/1005.0MP
AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB6/1001.2MP

"ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB", performance comparison by specification sheet

ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GBAQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB
ImageZTE Blade X (2017) 16GBAQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB
MakerZTE
Release date2017-102013-12-06
ColorBlack/ / /
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)77.5mm x 156.0mm x 8.9mm70.0mm x 132.0mm x 9.9mm
Weight156.0g147.0g
Display size5.5inch5.2inch
Display typeIPS LCDS-CGSilicon
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 12801080 x 1920
Pixel density267ppi423ppi
Battery capacity3000.0mAh2600.0mAh
ChipsetQualcomm MSM8917 Snapdragon 425Snapdragon 800 MSM8974
CPU specs1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores)2.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size2.0GB2.0GB
Storage size16.0GB32.0GB
Rear-camera resolution13.0MP16.3MP
Front-camera resolution5.0MP1.2MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

Articles related to ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB
Articles related to AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB

ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

Articles related to ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB
Articles related to AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB

AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as AQUOS PHONE Xx 302SH SoftBank 32GB

New articles