Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB vs vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB: Specs & Scores

Created date: 2018-09-30 22:37:51, Updated date: 2020-04-15 21:08:01

ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GBvivo Y53 (2017) 16GB
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GBvivo Y53 (2017) 16GB

Are you having trouble comparing the differences in features and performance of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB", or unsure about their differences in ease-of-use, and wondering which to buy? We did a deep-dive comparison of the features, specs, and capabilities of these two smartphone, and provided our rating of which one was a better buy.

ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GBvivo Y53 (2017) 16GB
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB

General rating:

50.3/100

(The 1506th of all smartphones)

49.8/100

(The 1518th of all smartphones)

Holding comfort
56/100
69/100
Weight
67/100
75/100
Screen size
82/100
74/100
Display quality
53/100
36/100
Battery life
65/100
57/100
Processing power
39/100
39/100
Memory capacity
50/100
50/100
Storage capacity
50/100
50/100
Rear camera performance
61/100
50/100
Front camera performance
50/100
50/100

"ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB", performance comparison

"ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB" size comparison. Which to choose?

The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.

The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has a width of 77.5mm, a length of 156.0mm, and a thickness of 8.9mm. Also, the "vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB" has a width of 71.4mm, a length of 144.2mm, and a thickness of 7.6mm.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB". The "vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB" excels over the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB" over the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB".

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB" is a more compact size than the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB". For that reason the "vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB" has higher one-handed operability, and has greater portability, being less likely to get in the way when being carried. For these reasons, we recommend the "vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB".

Comparing the overall size of the two devices, the "vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB" has a large size compared to the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB". For that reason the "vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB" is a size that is easier to use in one hand and comfortably carry than the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB". That's why we recommend the "vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB".

ScoreDimensions (width x height x thickness)
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB56/10077.5mm x 156.0mm x 8.9mm
vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB69/10071.4mm x 144.2mm x 7.6mm

"ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison

The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.

The weight of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is about 156.0g, and the weight of the "vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB" is about 137.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB" is a lighter smart phone than the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB", with a difference of about 19g. For that reason the "vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB" is a smart phone that is less likely than the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB"to put a burden on your fingers and wrist when used for an extended period. That's why we recommend the "vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB" over the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB".

ScoreWeight
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB67/100156.0g
vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB75/100137.0g

"ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB", whose display is easier to use?

The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.

The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has a 5.5inch display. Also, the "vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB" has a 5.0inch display. Comparing the screen size, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has a larger screen compared to the "vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB", with a roughly 0.5inch difference. As a result, the user is less likely to mistap when using apps on the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" than on the "vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB", and is also able to enjoy videos and games on a larger screen. Therefore, we recommend the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB".

ScoreDisplay size
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB82/1005.5inch
vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB74/1005.0inch

"ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB", which has a clearer display?

Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.

The resolution on the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is 720 x 1280, and pixel density is 267ppi. Also, the resolution on the "vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB" is 540 x 960, and pixel density is 220ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has much higher pixel density than the "vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB", with a difference of roughly 47ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is superior to the "vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" over the "vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB".

ScorePixel density
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB53/100267ppi
vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB36/100220ppi

"ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB", a summary of the differences in battery life

Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.

The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is 3000.0mAh, and the "vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB" is 2500.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has greater battery capacity than the "vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB", with a 500mAh difference. If battery is a priority, then the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is recommended over the "vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB".

ScoreBattery capacity
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB65/1003000.0mAh
vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB57/1002500.0mAh

"ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB", which has better CPU?

CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.

The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm MSM8917 Snapdragon 425, with performance measured at 1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores). Also, the "vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm MSM8917 Snapdragon 425, with performance measured at 1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, there is almost no difference in the specs of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and the "vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB". For that reason the level of smoothness felt when using apps and comfortable handling of games is about the same. For that reason it is better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreCPU specs
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB39/1001.4GHz×4(4.0-cores)
vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB39/1001.4GHz×4(4.0-cores)

"ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?

RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.

The weight of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is 2.0GB and the weight of the "vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB" is 2.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, there is almost no difference in the amount of RAM of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and the "vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB". For that reason they have about the same level of multitasking performance and 3D game and VR smoothness. That's why it is better to make a comparison in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreRAM size
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB50/1002.0GB
vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB50/1002.0GB

"ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB", which has more data storage?

Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.

The data storage capacity of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is 16.0GB. Also the "vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB" is 16.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, there is a negligible difference in storage capacity between the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB". As a result, you can save roughly the same amount of pictures, and install roughly the same amount of applications, on either phone. You are better off comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreStorage size
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB50/10016.0GB
vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB50/10016.0GB

"ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Also, "vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB" has a 8.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB", with a roughly 5MP difference. In terms of taking or shooting high resolution pictures or videos that will look clean when printed, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is superior to the "vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting videos and taking pictures, we recommend the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" over the "vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB".

ScoreRear-camera resolution
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB61/10013.0MP
vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB50/1008.0MP

"ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has an 5.0MP front camera and "vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB" has an 5.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB" have approximately the same pixel count. As a result, they can both take pictures and shoot videos of roughly the same quality. Therefore, we recommend comparing the two based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreFront-camera resolution
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB50/1005.0MP
vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB50/1005.0MP

"ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB", performance comparison by specification sheet

ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GBvivo Y53 (2017) 16GB
ImageZTE Blade X (2017) 16GBvivo Y53 (2017) 16GB
MakerZTEvivo
Release date2017-102017-03
ColorBlackCrown Gold/Matte Black
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)77.5mm x 156.0mm x 8.9mm71.4mm x 144.2mm x 7.6mm
Weight156.0g137.0g
Display size5.5inch5.0inch
Display typeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 1280540 x 960
Pixel density267ppi220ppi
Battery capacity3000.0mAh2500.0mAh
ChipsetQualcomm MSM8917 Snapdragon 425Qualcomm MSM8917 Snapdragon 425
CPU specs1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores)1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size2.0GB2.0GB
Storage size16.0GB16.0GB
Rear-camera resolution13.0MP8.0MP
Front-camera resolution5.0MP5.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

Articles related to ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB
Articles related to vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB

ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

Articles related to ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB
Articles related to vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB

vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as vivo Y53 (2017) 16GB

New articles