Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

ZTE Blade Force 16GB vs Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB: Full Comparison!

Created date: 2018-09-30 21:21:14, Updated date: 2021-10-20 14:59:46

ZTE Blade Force 16GBAllview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB
ZTE Blade Force 16GBAllview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB

Are you having trouble comparing the differences in features and performance of the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB", or unsure about their differences in ease-of-use, and wondering which to buy? We did a deep-dive comparison of the features, specs, and capabilities of these two smartphone, and provided our rating of which one was a better buy.

ZTE Blade Force 16GBAllview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB
ZTE Blade Force 16GB

Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB

General rating:
Holding comfortrating-image2.8
78.0mm x 156.0mm x 9.1mm
rating-image3.3
72.4mm x 148.7mm x 9.1mm
Weightrating-image3.1
170.1g
rating-image3.3
161.0g
Screen sizerating-image4.1
5.5inch
rating-image3.9
5.2inch
Display qualityrating-image2.7
267ppi
rating-image2.9
282ppi
Battery liferating-image3.3
3000.0mAh
rating-image4.0
4000.0mAh
Processing powerrating-image2.0
1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores)
rating-image3.5
1.3GHz×8(8.0-cores)
Memory capacityrating-image2.5
2.0GB
rating-image3.0
3.0GB
Storage capacityrating-image2.5
16.0GB
rating-image2.8
32.0GB
Rear camera performancerating-image2.5
8.0MP
rating-image3.1
13.0MP
Front camera performancerating-image2.5
5.0MP
rating-image2.9
8.0MP

"ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB", performance comparison

"ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" size comparison. Which to choose?

The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.

The "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" has a width of 78.0mm, a length of 156.0mm, and a thickness of 9.1mm. Also, the "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" has a width of 72.4mm, a length of 148.7mm, and a thickness of 9.1mm.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB". The "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" excels over the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" over the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB".

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and the "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB". For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

Comparing the overall size of the two devices, the "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" has a large size compared to the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB". For that reason the "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" is a size that is easier to use in one hand and comfortably carry than the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB". That's why we recommend the "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB".

ScoreDimensions (width x height x thickness)
ZTE Blade Force 16GB55/10078.0mm x 156.0mm x 9.1mm
Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB65/10072.4mm x 148.7mm x 9.1mm

"ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison

The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.

The weight of the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" is about 170.1g, and the weight of the "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" is about 161.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, there isn't much difference in weight between the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB". That's why the likelihood of fatigue in the fingers and wrists after extended use is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreWeight
ZTE Blade Force 16GB62/100170.1g
Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB65/100161.0g

"ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB", whose display is easier to use?

The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.

The "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" has a 5.5inch display. Also, the "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" has a 5.2inch display. Comparing the screen size, there is a negligible difference in screen size between the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and the "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB". As a result, the app buttons on both are equally easy to press. We recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreDisplay size
ZTE Blade Force 16GB82/1005.5inch
Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB77/1005.2inch

"ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB", which has a clearer display?

Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.

The resolution on the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" is 720 x 1280, and pixel density is 267ppi. Also, the resolution on the "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" is 720 x 1280, and pixel density is 282ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the difference in pixel density between the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and the "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" is negligible. As a result, they are both evenly matched in terms of picture quality and easiness on the eyes. Therefore, we recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScorePixel density
ZTE Blade Force 16GB53/100267ppi
Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB57/100282ppi

"ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB", a summary of the differences in battery life

Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.

The "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" is 3000.0mAh, and the "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" is 4000.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" has greater battery capacity than the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB", with a 1000mAh difference. Since the "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" can be used for longer periods without recharging than the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB", it is great for outdoor use. If you want a smartphone with a longer battery life, we recommend the "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" over the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB".

ScoreBattery capacity
ZTE Blade Force 16GB65/1003000.0mAh
Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB80/1004000.0mAh

"ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB", which has better CPU?

CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.

The "ZTE Blade Force 16GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm MSM8920 Snapdragon 427, with performance measured at 1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores). Also, the "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB"'s CPU is a Mediatek MT6753, with performance measured at 1.3GHz×8(8.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" has considerably higher specs than the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB". In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" is superior to the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB". If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" over the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB".

ScoreCPU specs
ZTE Blade Force 16GB39/1001.4GHz×4(4.0-cores)
Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB69/1001.3GHz×8(8.0-cores)

"ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?

RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.

The weight of the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" is 2.0GB and the weight of the "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" is 3.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB", with a difference of about 1GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" is superior to the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" over the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB".

ScoreRAM size
ZTE Blade Force 16GB50/1002.0GB
Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB60/1003.0GB

"ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB", which has more data storage?

Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.

The data storage capacity of the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" is 16.0GB. Also the "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" is 32.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" has a greater storage capacity compared to the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB", with a roughly 16GB difference. As a result, the "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" can take more pictures and videos, and have more applications installed, than the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB". Therefore, we recommend the "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB".

ScoreStorage size
ZTE Blade Force 16GB50/10016.0GB
Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB55/10032.0GB

"ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"ZTE Blade Force 16GB" has a 8.0MP main camera. Also, "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB", with a roughly 5MP difference. In terms of taking or shooting high resolution pictures or videos that will look clean when printed, the "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" is superior to the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting videos and taking pictures, we recommend the "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" over the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB".

ScoreRear-camera resolution
ZTE Blade Force 16GB50/1008.0MP
Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB61/10013.0MP

"ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"ZTE Blade Force 16GB" has an 5.0MP front camera and "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" has an 8.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" has a higher pixel count than the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB", with a roughly 3MP difference. As a result, the "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" is better able to take high quality selfies than the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB", and the pictures will look cleaner when printed. Therefore, we recommend the "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB".

ScoreFront-camera resolution
ZTE Blade Force 16GB50/1005.0MP
Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB58/1008.0MP

"ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB", performance comparison by specification sheet

ZTE Blade Force 16GBAllview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB
ImageZTE Blade Force 16GBAllview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB
MakerZTEAllview
Release date2017-102017-06
ColorBlueBlack/Gold
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)78.0mm x 156.0mm x 9.1mm72.4mm x 148.7mm x 9.1mm
Weight170.1g161.0g
Display size5.5inch5.2inch
Display typeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 1280720 x 1280
Pixel density267ppi282ppi
Battery capacity3000.0mAh4000.0mAh
ChipsetQualcomm MSM8920 Snapdragon 427Mediatek MT6753
CPU specs1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores)1.3GHz×8(8.0-cores)
RAM size2.0GB3.0GB
Storage size16.0GB32.0GB
Rear-camera resolution8.0MP13.0MP
Front-camera resolution5.0MP8.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

Articles related to ZTE Blade Force 16GB
Articles related to Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB

ZTE Blade Force 16GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as ZTE Blade Force 16GB

Articles related to ZTE Blade Force 16GB
Articles related to Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB

Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB

New articles