Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Compare XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB vs Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB

Created date: 2018-09-30 22:43:37, Updated date: 2020-04-16 17:53:25

XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GBLava Z50 (2018) 8GB
XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GBLava Z50 (2018) 8GB

How did the evaluations between the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" and "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB" differ when we compared the two? We reviewed each of the most commonly scrutinized features. If you are thinking about which smartphone to get, check out this review immediately!

XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GBLava Z50 (2018) 8GB
XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB

Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB

General rating:

36.8/100

(The 1817th of all smartphones)

39.2/100

(The 1759th of all smartphones)

Portability
78/100
74/100
Weight
90/100
74/100
Size of screen
69/100
66/100
Screen clarity
42/100
35/100
Battery duration
44/100
50/100
Processing capability
14/100
13/100
Memory capacity
20/100
20/100
Storage capacity
24/100
24/100
Rear camera function
50/100
27/100
Front camera function
15/100
50/100

Compare Performance and Usability

Size comparison of "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" and "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB". Which one would you choose?

Your device's size has a huge influence on how easy it is to hold or to operate with one hand. The smaller your device's width, the easier it will be to hold, but you'll also need to take device thickness into account. And when the length and width are both smaller, you'll find that it's much easier for you to operate it one-handed, since your fingers will find it much easier to reach where you want them to. On the other hand, longer lengths and wider widths might lead to devices that are hard to carry in your pocket, bulky even when you keep them in your bag, and all around less portable.

The "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" is 67.2mm wide, 135.8mm tall, and 7.2mm thick. The "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB" is 66.6mm tall, 135.0mm wide, and 9.7mm thick.

There is no real difference between the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" and "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB" when comparing their width, thickness, and slimness; they are both around the same in terms of one-handed ease of use and carry. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.

There is no real difference in length or width between the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" and "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB", so they are both about the same in terms of usability, ease of carry, and bulkiness. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.

When comparing their sizes as a whole, there is no real difference between the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB"and "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB". Thus they are roughly the same in terms of ease of carry and one-handed use. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.

ScoreDimensions (width x height x thickness)
XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB78/10067.2mm x 135.8mm x 7.2mm
Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB74/10066.6mm x 135.0mm x 9.7mm

Which one is easier to hold, "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" or "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB"? Compare weight

The device weight will effect how quickly you tire from holding it, and how much stress is put on your wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you can hold it without feeling tired. Also, less stress on your wrist will make using it easier and more pleasant. Unless the weight is right for you, it might put too much strain on your body and make using it more stressful.

The "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" weighs 100.0g. The "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB" clocks in at 140.0g. If you compare the weight of the two, the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" is a considerably lighter smartphone than the "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB", with a difference of about 40g. Because of this, the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" puts less of a burden on the fingers and wrists than the "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB". If you want a smartphone that won't tire your hands out even when using it for a long time, we recommend that you buy the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" rather than the "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB".

ScoreWeight
XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB90/100100.0g
Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB74/100140.0g

Which is better in terms of display, "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" or "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB"?

Screen size influences how well you can control your device, as well as how clear the display is. With a large screen, the text and buttons in apps will display large enough so you'll be less likely to accidentally tap the button next to the one you were aiming for. Plus, you'll be able to enjoy more high-impact visuals for games and movies.

The screen size on the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" is 4.7inch, and 4.5inch on the "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB". The screens of the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" and "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB" are roughly the same size, and so the ease of pressing app buttons are the same on both devices. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.

ScoreDisplay size
XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB69/1004.7inch
Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB66/1004.5inch

Which one has a better display, "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" or "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB"?

Pixel density influences how nice your device's screen looks, with high pixel densities making screens look more beautiful, and letting you get more out of your games and movies. Plus, the nicer you screen looks, the less strain you'll be putting on your eyes, so you'll tend to be able to use your device for longer before your eyes get tired.

The screen on the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" has a 540 x 960 resolution and a pixel density of 234ppi. The "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB", on the other hand, has a screen resolution of 480 x 854 and a pixel density of 217ppi. Comparing the number of pixels on the screen, the pixel density of the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" is higher than the "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB", with a difference of approximately 17ppi. Therefor, the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" is better able to display images and videos than the "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB", and is easier on the eyes. For this reason, the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" is recommended.

ScorePixel density
XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB42/100234ppi
Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB35/100217ppi

How is the battery duration of "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" different from that of "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB" ? See the differences

Battery performance has a big effect on the battery life of your device. However, a high battery capacity doesn't necessarily mean a long battery life. Rather, the rate of power consumption needs to be taken into consideration as well. The larger the screen and the higher the CPU performance, the higher the rate of power consumption on your battery.

The "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" has a battery capacity of 1800.0mAh, while the "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB" has a 2000.0mAh battery. Regarding the battery performance, the "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB" has a larger battery capacity than the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB", with a difference of 200mAh. If you are choosing based on the battery, the "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB" is recommended over the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB".

ScoreBattery capacity
XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB44/1001800.0mAh
Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB50/1002000.0mAh

Which is better in terms of CPU function, "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" or "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB"?

Your CPU's speed will influence the processing power of the applications you run, and together with the number of cores in the CPU, as well as its clock frequency, will determine the processing power available for apps. The higher these performance factors, the smoother your games and apps will run. Conversely, if these factors are too low, your apps and games will be sluggish and struggle to run.

The "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" is equipped with a Qualcomm MSM8212 Snapdragon 200 processor, and its performance speed is 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores). The "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB" uses an Mediatek MT6737M CPU that performs at a speed of 1.1GHz×4(4.0-cores). There is also no real discrepancy between the CPU performances of the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" and "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB". Because of this, both phones will feel practically identical in terms of smoothness when running apps and ease of game play. This is why it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.

ScoreCPU specs
XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB14/1001.2GHz×4(4.0-cores)
Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB13/1001.1GHz×4(4.0-cores)

How is "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" different from "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB" in terms of memory capacity?

Your device's multimedia performance and app stability are both influenced by the amount of memory it has available. The more memory, the more apps you can use simultaneously, while keeping everything stable and smooth. Plus, there'll be less chance of animations lagging or apps crashing. You also need to keep in mind that some games won't run at all if there's not enough memory available.

The "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" has 1.0GB of memory. The "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB", on the other hand, has 1.0GB. Memory performance is roughly the same for both the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" and "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB"; as a result, multitasking, playing 3D games, and using VR feels the same on both devices. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.

ScoreRAM size
XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB20/1001.0GB
Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB20/1001.0GB

Which has a better storage capacity, "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" or "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB"?

Storage capacity determines the amount of data you'll be able to save on your device. The more storage you have, the more photos you can take and the more apps you can install. Plus, if your smartphone is compatible with SD cards, then you can increase the amount of available storage. However, SD cards have a slower writespeed, making them less desirable in terms of performance, and users should be aware that it won't be possible to transfer all kinds of data to the card.

The "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" has 8.0GB of storage, while the "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB" has 8.0GB. There is no real difference between the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB"and "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB" 's ROMs and storage capacities, so both can store roughly the same amount of photographs and apps. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.

ScoreStorage size
XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB24/1008.0GB
Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB24/1008.0GB

Compare the rear cameras of "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" and "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB". Which one has better picture quality?

One factor in how well your rear camera (the camera on the back of your device) performs is its megapixel count. With a higher megapixel count, you'll be able to take photos with sharper detail, photos that stay clear and sharp even when printed.

The main camera on the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" has 8.0MP. The "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB" has 5.0MP. The rear-facing camera of the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" also has a higher pixel count than the "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB", with a difference of about 3MP. The "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" is more capable than the "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB" of taking high-definition photos and videos, and produces better results when printing out the photos you have taken. If you want a smartphone that is designed for video and photography, we recommend buying the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" rather than the "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB".

ScoreRear-camera resolution
XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB50/1008.0MP
Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB27/1005.0MP

Which has a front camera with better picture quality, "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" or "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB"?

One indication of how well your forward facing camera (the camera on the same side as your device's screen) performs is how many megapixels it has. More megapixels means you'll be able to take photos with sharper detail, that still look amazing printed out.

The forward-facing camera on the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" has a resolution of 2.0MP. The "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB"'s has 5.0MP. The front-facing camera of the "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB" has a significantly higher number of pixels than the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB", with a difference of about 3MP. Therefore, the "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB" is more suitable for taking photos and videos than the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB". If you want to take and print high-quality selfies, we recommend buying the "Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB" rather than the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB".

ScoreFront-camera resolution
XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB15/1002.0MP
Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB50/1005.0MP

Compare Performance Specs

XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GBLava Z50 (2018) 8GB
ImageXOLO Q900s (2014) 8GBLava Z50 (2018) 8GB
MakerXOLOLava
Release date2014-072018-03
ColorBlack/WhiteGold/Black
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)67.2mm x 135.8mm x 7.2mm66.6mm x 135.0mm x 9.7mm
Weight100.0g140.0g
Display size4.7inch4.5inch
Display typeIPS LCDTN TFT
Screen resolution (width x height)540 x 960480 x 854
Pixel density234ppi217ppi
Battery capacity1800.0mAh2000.0mAh
ChipsetQualcomm MSM8212 Snapdragon 200Mediatek MT6737M
CPU specs1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores)1.1GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size1.0GB1.0GB
Storage size8.0GB8.0GB
Rear-camera resolution8.0MP5.0MP
Front-camera resolution2.0MP5.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

Articles related to XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB
Articles related to Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB

XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB

Articles related to XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB
Articles related to Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB

Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Lava Z50 (2018) 8GB

New articles