Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Which should you buy, the Allview P5 Energy 16GB or ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB? We offer a thorough comparison of the differences in functions, specifications and performance between the two

Created date: 2018-09-30 21:37:47, Updated date: 2020-04-16 19:08:13

Allview P5 Energy 16GBZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB
Allview P5 Energy 16GBZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

Are you having trouble comparing the differences in features and performance of the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB" and "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB", or unsure about their differences in ease-of-use, and wondering which to buy? We did a deep-dive comparison of the features, specs, and capabilities of these two smartphone, and provided our rating of which one was a better buy.

Allview P5 Energy 16GBZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB
Allview P5 Energy 16GB

ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

General rating:

38.3/100

(The 1780th of all smartphones)

50.3/100

(The 1506th of all smartphones)

Holding comfort
72/100
56/100
Weight
67/100
67/100
Screen size
66/100
82/100
Display quality
35/100
53/100
Battery life
80/100
65/100
Processing power
11/100
39/100
Memory capacity
20/100
50/100
Storage capacity
50/100
50/100
Rear camera performance
27/100
61/100
Front camera performance
15/100
50/100

"Allview P5 Energy 16GB" and "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB", performance comparison

"Allview P5 Energy 16GB" and "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" size comparison. Which to choose?

The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.

The "Allview P5 Energy 16GB" has a width of 66.2mm, a length of 134.2mm, and a thickness of 11.2mm. Also, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has a width of 77.5mm, a length of 156.0mm, and a thickness of 8.9mm.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB". The "Allview P5 Energy 16GB" excels over the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB" over the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB".

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB". The "Allview P5 Energy 16GB" excels over the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB" over the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB".

Comparing the overall size of the two devices, the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB" is a considerably larger size than the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB". In terms of being more convenient to use one-handed, and less likely to get in the way when you're not using it, the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB" is superior to the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB". If you're going for the smart phone sized to be easiest to carry and handle with one hand, we recommend buying the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB" over the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB".

ScoreDimensions (width x height x thickness)
Allview P5 Energy 16GB72/10066.2mm x 134.2mm x 11.2mm
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB56/10077.5mm x 156.0mm x 8.9mm

"Allview P5 Energy 16GB" and "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison

The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.

The weight of the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB" is about 156.5g, and the weight of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is about 156.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, there isn't much difference in weight between the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB" and "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB". That's why the likelihood of fatigue in the fingers and wrists after extended use is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreWeight
Allview P5 Energy 16GB67/100156.5g
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB67/100156.0g

"Allview P5 Energy 16GB" and "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB", whose display is easier to use?

The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.

The "Allview P5 Energy 16GB" has a 4.5inch display. Also, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has a 5.5inch display. Comparing the screen size, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has a considerably larger screen than the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB", with a difference of approximately 1inch. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is superior to the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB" in terms of its larger buttons and the intensity of the user's experience when playing games and watching videos. In addition, the larger screen on the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has the benefit of being easier on the user's eyes. If you are looking for a smartphone that you are less likely to mistap, offers a more intense viewing and gaming experience, and decreases eyestrain, then we recommend the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" over the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB".

ScoreDisplay size
Allview P5 Energy 16GB66/1004.5inch
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB82/1005.5inch

"Allview P5 Energy 16GB" and "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB", which has a clearer display?

Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.

The resolution on the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB" is 480 x 854, and pixel density is 217ppi. Also, the resolution on the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is 720 x 1280, and pixel density is 267ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has much higher pixel density than the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB", with a difference of roughly 50ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is superior to the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" over the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB".

ScorePixel density
Allview P5 Energy 16GB35/100217ppi
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB53/100267ppi

"Allview P5 Energy 16GB" and "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB", a summary of the differences in battery life

Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.

The "Allview P5 Energy 16GB" is 4000.0mAh, and the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is 3000.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB" has greater battery capacity than the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB", with a 1000mAh difference. Since the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB" can be used for longer periods without recharging than the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB", it is great for outdoor use. If you want a smartphone with a longer battery life, we recommend the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB" over the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB".

ScoreBattery capacity
Allview P5 Energy 16GB80/1004000.0mAh
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB65/1003000.0mAh

"Allview P5 Energy 16GB" and "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB", which has better CPU?

CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.

The "Allview P5 Energy 16GB"'s CPU is a Mediatek MT6735M, with performance measured at 1.0GHz×4(4.0-cores). Also, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm MSM8917 Snapdragon 425, with performance measured at 1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has considerably higher specs than the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB". In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is superior to the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB". If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" over the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB".

ScoreCPU specs
Allview P5 Energy 16GB11/1001.0GHz×4(4.0-cores)
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB39/1001.4GHz×4(4.0-cores)

"Allview P5 Energy 16GB" and "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?

RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.

The weight of the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB" is 1.0GB and the weight of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is 2.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB", with a difference of about 1GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is superior to the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" over the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB".

ScoreRAM size
Allview P5 Energy 16GB20/1001.0GB
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB50/1002.0GB

"Allview P5 Energy 16GB" and "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB", which has more data storage?

Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.

The data storage capacity of the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB" is 16.0GB. Also the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is 16.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, there is a negligible difference in storage capacity between the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB" and "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB". As a result, you can save roughly the same amount of pictures, and install roughly the same amount of applications, on either phone. You are better off comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreStorage size
Allview P5 Energy 16GB50/10016.0GB
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB50/10016.0GB

"Allview P5 Energy 16GB" and "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"Allview P5 Energy 16GB" has a 5.0MP main camera. Also, "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB", with a roughly 8MP difference. In terms of taking or shooting high resolution pictures or videos that will look clean when printed, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is superior to the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting videos and taking pictures, we recommend the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" over the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB".

ScoreRear-camera resolution
Allview P5 Energy 16GB27/1005.0MP
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB61/10013.0MP

"Allview P5 Energy 16GB" and "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"Allview P5 Energy 16GB" has an 2.0MP front camera and "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has an 5.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB", with a roughly 3MP difference. As a result, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is more suited than the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB" for shooting videos and taking pictures. If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting high resolution selfies which will look clean when printed, we recommend the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" over the "Allview P5 Energy 16GB".

ScoreFront-camera resolution
Allview P5 Energy 16GB15/1002.0MP
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB50/1005.0MP

"Allview P5 Energy 16GB" and "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB", performance comparison by specification sheet

Allview P5 Energy 16GBZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB
ImageAllview P5 Energy 16GBZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB
MakerAllviewZTE
Release date2015-092017-10
ColorBlack/WhiteBlack
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)66.2mm x 134.2mm x 11.2mm77.5mm x 156.0mm x 8.9mm
Weight156.5g156.0g
Display size4.5inch5.5inch
Display typeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)480 x 854720 x 1280
Pixel density217ppi267ppi
Battery capacity4000.0mAh3000.0mAh
ChipsetMediatek MT6735MQualcomm MSM8917 Snapdragon 425
CPU specs1.0GHz×4(4.0-cores)1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size1.0GB2.0GB
Storage size16.0GB16.0GB
Rear-camera resolution5.0MP13.0MP
Front-camera resolution2.0MP5.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

Articles related to Allview P5 Energy 16GB
Articles related to ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

Allview P5 Energy 16GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Allview P5 Energy 16GB

Articles related to Allview P5 Energy 16GB
Articles related to ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

New articles