Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Compare BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB vs ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB

Created date: 2018-09-30 22:37:12, Updated date: 2020-04-15 17:36:19

BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GBARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB
BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GBARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB

How did the evaluations between the "BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" differ when we compared the two? We reviewed each of the most commonly scrutinized features. If you are thinking about which smartphone to get, check out this review immediately!

BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GBARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB
BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB

ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB

General rating:
Holding comfortrating-image3.3
72.0mm x 143.5mm x 8.7mm
rating-image3.5
69.0mm x 139.0mm x 9.8mm
Weightrating-image3.7
142.0g
rating-image3.4
158.0g
Screen sizerating-image3.7
5.0inch
rating-image3.7
5.0inch
Display qualityrating-image3.0
293ppi
rating-image4.3
440ppi
Battery liferating-image2.9
2500.0mAh
rating-image3.3
3020.0mAh
Processing powerrating-image1.8
1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)
rating-image2.4
1.7GHz×4(4.0-cores)
Memory capacityrating-image2.5
2.0GB
rating-image2.5
2.0GB
Storage capacityrating-image2.5
16.0GB
rating-image3.4
64.0GB
Rear camera performancerating-image2.5
8.0MP
rating-image3.1
13.1MP
Front camera performancerating-image2.5
5.0MP
rating-image1
1.25MP

"BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB", performance comparison

"BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" size comparison. Which to choose?

The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.

The "BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB" has a width of 72.0mm, a length of 143.5mm, and a thickness of 8.7mm. Also, the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" has a width of 69.0mm, a length of 139.0mm, and a thickness of 9.8mm.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't much difference between the "BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" in terms of size. For that reason, the ease of gripping and carrying the devices in one hand is about the same for both. Therefore it's better to compare them in terms of performance and functionality.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the "BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB" and the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB". For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

Comparing the overall size of the two devices, there isn't a big difference in size between the "BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB" and the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB". For that reason the ease of carrying and use with one hand is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreDimensions (width x height x thickness)
BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB66/10072.0mm x 143.5mm x 8.7mm
ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB70/10069.0mm x 139.0mm x 9.8mm

"BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison

The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.

The weight of the "BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB" is about 142.0g, and the weight of the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" is about 158.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB" is a lighter smart phone than the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB", with a difference of about 16g. For that reason the "BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB" is a smart phone that is less likely than the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"to put a burden on your fingers and wrist when used for an extended period. That's why we recommend the "BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB" over the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB".

ScoreWeight
BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB73/100142.0g
ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB67/100158.0g

"BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB", whose display is easier to use?

The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.

The "BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB" has a 5.0inch display. Also, the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" has a 5.0inch display. Comparing the screen size, there is a negligible difference in screen size between the "BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB" and the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB". As a result, the app buttons on both are equally easy to press. We recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreDisplay size
BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB74/1005.0inch
ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB74/1005.0inch

"BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB", which has a clearer display?

Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.

The resolution on the "BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB" is 720 x 1280, and pixel density is 293ppi. Also, the resolution on the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" is 1080 x 1920, and pixel density is 440ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" has much higher pixel density than the "BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB", with a difference of roughly 147ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" is superior to the "BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" over the "BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB".

ScorePixel density
BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB59/100293ppi
ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB85/100440ppi

"BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB", a summary of the differences in battery life

Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.

The "BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB" is 2500.0mAh, and the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" is 3020.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" has greater battery capacity than the "BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB", with a 520mAh difference. If battery is a priority, then the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" is recommended over the "BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB".

ScoreBattery capacity
BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB57/1002500.0mAh
ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB65/1003020.0mAh

"BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB", which has better CPU?

CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.

The "BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB"'s CPU is a Mediatek MT6735, with performance measured at 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). Also, the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"'s CPU is a Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T, with performance measured at 1.7GHz×4(4.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" has considerably higher specs than the "BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB". In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" is superior to the "BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB". If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" over the "BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB".

ScoreCPU specs
BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB36/1001.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)
ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB48/1001.7GHz×4(4.0-cores)

"BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?

RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.

The weight of the "BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB" is 2.0GB and the weight of the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" is 2.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, there is almost no difference in the amount of RAM of the "BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB" and the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB". For that reason they have about the same level of multitasking performance and 3D game and VR smoothness. That's why it is better to make a comparison in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreRAM size
BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB50/1002.0GB
ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB50/1002.0GB

"BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB", which has more data storage?

Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.

The data storage capacity of the "BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB" is 16.0GB. Also the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" is 64.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB", with a roughly 48GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" is superior to the "BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" over the "BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB".

ScoreStorage size
BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB50/10016.0GB
ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB67/10064.0GB

"BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB" has a 8.0MP main camera. Also, "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" has a 13.1MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB", with a roughly 5.1MP difference. In terms of taking or shooting high resolution pictures or videos that will look clean when printed, the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" is superior to the "BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting videos and taking pictures, we recommend the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" over the "BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB".

ScoreRear-camera resolution
BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB50/1008.0MP
ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB61/10013.1MP

"BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB" has an 5.0MP front camera and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" has an 1.25MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB", with a roughly 3.75MP difference. As a result, the "BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB" is more suited than the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" for shooting videos and taking pictures. If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting high resolution selfies which will look clean when printed, we recommend the "BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB" over the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB".

ScoreFront-camera resolution
BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB50/1005.0MP
ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB7/1001.25MP

"BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB", performance comparison by specification sheet

BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GBARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB
ImageBLU R1 HD (2016) 16GBARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB
MakerBLU
Release date2016-062013-06-28
ColorMidnight Black/ / /
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)72.0mm x 143.5mm x 8.7mm69.0mm x 139.0mm x 9.8mm
Weight142.0g158.0g
Display size5.0inch5.0inch
Display typeIPS LCDTFT
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 12801080 x 1920
Pixel density293ppi440ppi
Battery capacity2500.0mAh3020.0mAh
ChipsetMediatek MT6735Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T
CPU specs1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)1.7GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size2.0GB2.0GB
Storage size16.0GB64.0GB
Rear-camera resolution8.0MP13.1MP
Front-camera resolution5.0MP1.25MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

Articles related to BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB
Articles related to ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB

BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB

Articles related to BLU R1 HD (2016) 16GB
Articles related to ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB

ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB

New articles