Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

BLU Vivo XL2 32GB vs Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB: Full Comparison!

Created date: 2018-09-30 23:40:06, Updated date: 2020-04-16 19:36:42

BLU Vivo XL2 32GBWiko Upulse (2017) 32GB
BLU Vivo XL2 32GBWiko Upulse (2017) 32GB

How did the evaluations between the "BLU Vivo XL2 32GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" differ when we compared the two? We reviewed each of the most commonly scrutinized features. If you are thinking about which smartphone to get, check out this review immediately!

BLU Vivo XL2 32GBWiko Upulse (2017) 32GB
BLU Vivo XL2 32GB

Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB

General rating:
Holding comfortrating-image2.9
76.6mm x 154.0mm x 9.2mm
rating-image2.9
77.5mm x 153.5mm x 8.5mm
Weightrating-image3.0
175.0g
rating-image3.2
167.0g
Screen sizerating-image4.1
5.5inch
rating-image4.1
5.5inch
Display qualityrating-image2.7
267ppi
rating-image2.7
267ppi
Battery liferating-image3.4
3150.0mAh
rating-image3.3
3000.0mAh
Processing powerrating-image2.6
1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores)
rating-image2.5
1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)
Memory capacityrating-image3.0
3.0GB
rating-image3.0
3.0GB
Storage capacityrating-image2.8
32.0GB
rating-image2.8
32.0GB
Rear camera performancerating-image3.1
13.0MP
rating-image3.1
13.0MP
Front camera performancerating-image2.9
8.0MP
rating-image2.9
8.0MP

"BLU Vivo XL2 32GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB", performance comparison

"BLU Vivo XL2 32GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" size comparison. Which to choose?

The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.

The "BLU Vivo XL2 32GB" has a width of 76.6mm, a length of 154.0mm, and a thickness of 9.2mm. Also, the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" has a width of 77.5mm, a length of 153.5mm, and a thickness of 8.5mm.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't much difference between the "BLU Vivo XL2 32GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" in terms of size. For that reason, the ease of gripping and carrying the devices in one hand is about the same for both. Therefore it's better to compare them in terms of performance and functionality.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the "BLU Vivo XL2 32GB" and the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB". For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

Comparing the overall size of the two devices, there isn't a big difference in size between the "BLU Vivo XL2 32GB" and the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB". For that reason the ease of carrying and use with one hand is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreDimensions (width x height x thickness)
BLU Vivo XL2 32GB57/10076.6mm x 154.0mm x 9.2mm
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB57/10077.5mm x 153.5mm x 8.5mm

"BLU Vivo XL2 32GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison

The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.

The weight of the "BLU Vivo XL2 32GB" is about 175.0g, and the weight of the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" is about 167.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, there isn't much difference in weight between the "BLU Vivo XL2 32GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB". That's why the likelihood of fatigue in the fingers and wrists after extended use is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreWeight
BLU Vivo XL2 32GB60/100175.0g
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB63/100167.0g

"BLU Vivo XL2 32GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB", whose display is easier to use?

The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.

The "BLU Vivo XL2 32GB" has a 5.5inch display. Also, the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" has a 5.5inch display. Comparing the screen size, there is a negligible difference in screen size between the "BLU Vivo XL2 32GB" and the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB". As a result, the app buttons on both are equally easy to press. We recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreDisplay size
BLU Vivo XL2 32GB82/1005.5inch
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB82/1005.5inch

"BLU Vivo XL2 32GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB", which has a clearer display?

Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.

The resolution on the "BLU Vivo XL2 32GB" is 720 x 1280, and pixel density is 267ppi. Also, the resolution on the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" is 720 x 1280, and pixel density is 267ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the difference in pixel density between the "BLU Vivo XL2 32GB" and the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" is negligible. As a result, they are both evenly matched in terms of picture quality and easiness on the eyes. Therefore, we recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScorePixel density
BLU Vivo XL2 32GB53/100267ppi
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB53/100267ppi

"BLU Vivo XL2 32GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB", a summary of the differences in battery life

Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.

The "BLU Vivo XL2 32GB" is 3150.0mAh, and the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" is 3000.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, there is a negligible difference in battery capacity between the "BLU Vivo XL2 32GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB". Since both have roughly equal battery life, you are better off comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreBattery capacity
BLU Vivo XL2 32GB67/1003150.0mAh
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB65/1003000.0mAh

"BLU Vivo XL2 32GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB", which has better CPU?

CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.

The "BLU Vivo XL2 32GB"'s CPU is a Mediatek MT6737T, with performance measured at 1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores). Also, the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB"'s CPU is a Cortex-A53, with performance measured at 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, there is almost no difference in the specs of the "BLU Vivo XL2 32GB" and the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB". For that reason the level of smoothness felt when using apps and comfortable handling of games is about the same. For that reason it is better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreCPU specs
BLU Vivo XL2 32GB51/1001.4GHz×4(4.0-cores)
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB50/1001.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)

"BLU Vivo XL2 32GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?

RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.

The weight of the "BLU Vivo XL2 32GB" is 3.0GB and the weight of the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" is 3.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, there is almost no difference in the amount of RAM of the "BLU Vivo XL2 32GB" and the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB". For that reason they have about the same level of multitasking performance and 3D game and VR smoothness. That's why it is better to make a comparison in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreRAM size
BLU Vivo XL2 32GB60/1003.0GB
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB60/1003.0GB

"BLU Vivo XL2 32GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB", which has more data storage?

Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.

The data storage capacity of the "BLU Vivo XL2 32GB" is 32.0GB. Also the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" is 32.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, there is a negligible difference in storage capacity between the "BLU Vivo XL2 32GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB". As a result, you can save roughly the same amount of pictures, and install roughly the same amount of applications, on either phone. You are better off comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreStorage size
BLU Vivo XL2 32GB55/10032.0GB
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB55/10032.0GB

"BLU Vivo XL2 32GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"BLU Vivo XL2 32GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Also, "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "BLU Vivo XL2 32GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" have approximately the same pixel count. As a result, they can both take pictures and shoot videos of roughly the same quality. Therefore, we recommend comparing the two based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreRear-camera resolution
BLU Vivo XL2 32GB61/10013.0MP
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB61/10013.0MP

"BLU Vivo XL2 32GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"BLU Vivo XL2 32GB" has an 8.0MP front camera and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" has an 8.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "BLU Vivo XL2 32GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" have approximately the same pixel count. As a result, they can both take pictures and shoot videos of roughly the same quality. Therefore, we recommend comparing the two based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreFront-camera resolution
BLU Vivo XL2 32GB58/1008.0MP
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB58/1008.0MP

"BLU Vivo XL2 32GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB", performance comparison by specification sheet

BLU Vivo XL2 32GBWiko Upulse (2017) 32GB
ImageBLU Vivo XL2 32GBWiko Upulse (2017) 32GB
MakerBLUWiko
ColorGold/BlueBlack/Gold/Deep Bleen/Cherry Red
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)76.6mm x 154.0mm x 9.2mm77.5mm x 153.5mm x 8.5mm
Weight175.0g167.0g
Display size5.5inch5.5inch
Display typeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 1280720 x 1280
Pixel density267ppi267ppi
Battery capacity3150.0mAh3000.0mAh
ChipsetMediatek MT6737TCortex-A53
CPU specs1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores)1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size3.0GB3.0GB
Storage size32.0GB32.0GB
Rear-camera resolution13.0MP13.0MP
Front-camera resolution8.0MP8.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

Articles related to BLU Vivo XL2 32GB
Articles related to Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB

BLU Vivo XL2 32GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as BLU Vivo XL2 32GB

Articles related to BLU Vivo XL2 32GB
Articles related to Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB

Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB

New articles