Which is better, BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB or Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB? We compared their features and specs in detail
Created date: 2018-09-30 22:34:09, Updated date: 2021-10-20 14:25:39
Are you having trouble comparing the differences in features and performance of the "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" and "Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB", or unsure about their differences in ease-of-use, and wondering which to buy? We did a deep-dive comparison of the features, specs, and capabilities of these two smartphone, and provided our rating of which one was a better buy.
Contents
- 1."BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" and "Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB", performance comparison
- 1-0."BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" and "Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2."BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" and "Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3."BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" and "Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4."BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" and "Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5."BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" and "Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB", which has a clearer display?
- 1-6."BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" and "Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB", whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7."BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" and "Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB", which has more data storage?
- 1-8."BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" and "Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9."BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" and "Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB", which has better CPU?
- 1-10."BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" and "Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2."BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" and "Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
"BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" and "Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB", performance comparison
"BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" and "Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" has a width of 74.9mm, a length of 154.3mm, and a thickness of 7.0mm. Also, the "Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB" has a width of 73.8mm, a length of 148.1mm, and a thickness of 7.6mm.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't much difference between the "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" and "Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB" in terms of size. For that reason, the ease of gripping and carrying the devices in one hand is about the same for both. Therefore it's better to compare them in terms of performance and functionality.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" and the "Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB". For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Comparing the overall size of the two devices, there isn't a big difference in size between the "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" and the "Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB". For that reason the ease of carrying and use with one hand is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB | 64/100 | 74.9mm x 154.3mm x 7.0mm |
Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB | 65/100 | 73.8mm x 148.1mm x 7.6mm |
"BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" and "Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
The weight of the "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" is about 170.0g, and the weight of the "Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB" is about 137.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB" is a considerably lighter smart phone than the "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB", and there is a difference of about 33g. In terms of the burden placed upon your fingers and wrist, the "Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB" is superior to the "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB". If you are going for a smart phone that won't lead to hand fatigue even after extended use, and is less likely to place a burden on your fingers, we recommend purchasing the "Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB" over the "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB".
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB | 62/100 | 170.0g |
Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB | 75/100 | 137.0g |
"BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" and "Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB", whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" has a 5.5inch display. Also, the "Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB" has a 5.2inch display. Comparing the screen size, there is a negligible difference in screen size between the "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" and the "Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB". As a result, the app buttons on both are equally easy to press. We recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB | 82/100 | 5.5inch |
Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB | 77/100 | 5.2inch |
"BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" and "Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB", which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" is 1080 x 1920, and pixel density is 400ppi. Also, the resolution on the "Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB" is 720 x 1280, and pixel density is 282ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" has much higher pixel density than the "Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB", with a difference of roughly 118ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" is superior to the "Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" over the "Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB".
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB | 85/100 | 400ppi |
Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB | 57/100 | 282ppi |
"BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" and "Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
The "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" is 3130.0mAh, and the "Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB" is 3000.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, there is a negligible difference in battery capacity between the "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" and "Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB". Since both have roughly equal battery life, you are better off comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB | 66/100 | 3130.0mAh |
Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB | 65/100 | 3000.0mAh |
Want to read it together
"BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" and "Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB", which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
The "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB"'s CPU is a Mediatek MT6755 Helio P10, with performance measured at 1.8GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). Also, the "Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB"'s CPU is a Mediatek MT6750, with performance measured at 1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" has considerably higher specs than the "Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB". In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" is superior to the "Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB". If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" over the "Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB".
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB | 72/100 | 1.8GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB | 61/100 | 1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
"BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" and "Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
The weight of the "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" is 4.0GB and the weight of the "Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB" is 3.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB", with a difference of about 1GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" is superior to the "Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" over the "Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB".
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB | 70/100 | 4.0GB |
Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB | 60/100 | 3.0GB |
"BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" and "Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB", which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" is 64.0GB. Also the "Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB" is 16.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB", with a roughly 48GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" is superior to the "Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" over the "Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB".
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB | 67/100 | 64.0GB |
Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB | 50/100 | 16.0GB |
"BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" and "Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Also, "Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" and "Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB" have approximately the same pixel count. As a result, they can both take pictures and shoot videos of roughly the same quality. Therefore, we recommend comparing the two based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB | 61/100 | 13.0MP |
Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB | 61/100 | 13.0MP |
"BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" and "Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" has an 8.0MP front camera and "Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB" has an 5.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" has a higher pixel count than the "Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB", with a roughly 3MP difference. As a result, the "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" is better able to take high quality selfies than the "Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB", and the pictures will look cleaner when printed. Therefore, we recommend the "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB".
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB | 58/100 | 8.0MP |
Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB | 50/100 | 5.0MP |
"BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" and "Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB | Oppo A71 (2017) 16GB | |
Image | ||
Maker | BLU | Oppo |
Release date | 2016-11 | 2017-09 |
Color | Gold/Rose gold | Gold/Black |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 74.9mm x 154.3mm x 7.0mm | 73.8mm x 148.1mm x 7.6mm |
Weight | 170.0g | 137.0g |
Display size | 5.5inch | 5.2inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 1920 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 400ppi | 282ppi |
Battery capacity | 3130.0mAh | 3000.0mAh |
Chipset | Mediatek MT6755 Helio P10 | Mediatek MT6750 |
CPU specs | 1.8GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 4.0GB | 3.0GB |
Storage size | 64.0GB | 16.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 5.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |