Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Compare BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB vs Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB

Created date: 2018-09-30 22:50:21, Updated date: 2021-10-20 14:41:51

BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GBSharp Z2 (2016) 32GB
BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GBSharp Z2 (2016) 32GB

Here's our thorough comparison of the difference in performance and function between the "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB". Which one should you buy? We'll compare and explain what differs between the "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" in a way that even people who aren't used to choosing between two similar products can understand.

BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GBSharp Z2 (2016) 32GB
BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB

Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB

General rating:
Portabilityrating-image3.2
64/100
rating-image3.0
60/100
Weightrating-image3.1
62/100
rating-image3.3
66/100
Size of screenrating-image4.1
82/100
rating-image4.1
82/100
Screen clarityrating-image4.3
85/100
rating-image4.3
85/100
Battery durationrating-image3.3
66/100
rating-image3.3
65/100
Processing capabilityrating-image3.6
72/100
rating-image4.5
90/100
Memory capacityrating-image3.5
70/100
rating-image3.5
70/100
Storage capacityrating-image3.4
67/100
rating-image2.8
55/100
Rear camera functionrating-image3.1
61/100
rating-image3.4
68/100
Front camera functionrating-image2.9
58/100
rating-image2.9
58/100

Compare Performance and Usability

Size comparison of "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB". Which one would you choose?

Your device's size has a huge influence on how easy it is to hold or to operate with one hand. The smaller your device's width, the easier it will be to hold, but you'll also need to take device thickness into account. And when the length and width are both smaller, you'll find that it's much easier for you to operate it one-handed, since your fingers will find it much easier to reach where you want them to. On the other hand, longer lengths and wider widths might lead to devices that are hard to carry in your pocket, bulky even when you keep them in your bag, and all around less portable.

The "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" is 74.9mm wide, 154.3mm tall, and 7.0mm thick. The "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" is 76.0mm tall, 153.0mm wide, and 8.4mm thick.

There is no real difference between the "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" when comparing their width, thickness, and slimness; they are both around the same in terms of one-handed ease of use and carry. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.

There is no real difference in length or width between the "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB", so they are both about the same in terms of usability, ease of carry, and bulkiness. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.

When comparing their sizes as a whole, there is no real difference between the "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB"and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB". Thus they are roughly the same in terms of ease of carry and one-handed use. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.

ScoreDimensions (width x height x thickness)
BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB64/10074.9mm x 154.3mm x 7.0mm
Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB60/10076.0mm x 153.0mm x 8.4mm

Which one is easier to hold, "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" or "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB"? Compare weight

The device weight will effect how quickly you tire from holding it, and how much stress is put on your wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you can hold it without feeling tired. Also, less stress on your wrist will make using it easier and more pleasant. Unless the weight is right for you, it might put too much strain on your body and make using it more stressful.

The "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" weighs 170.0g. The "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" clocks in at 160.0g. The "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" have around the same weight, so prolonged use will tire out fingers nd wrists to around the same degree. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.

ScoreWeight
BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB62/100170.0g
Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB66/100160.0g

Which is better in terms of display, "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" or "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB"?

Screen size influences how well you can control your device, as well as how clear the display is. With a large screen, the text and buttons in apps will display large enough so you'll be less likely to accidentally tap the button next to the one you were aiming for. Plus, you'll be able to enjoy more high-impact visuals for games and movies.

The screen size on the "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" is 5.5inch, and 5.5inch on the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB". The screens of the "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" are roughly the same size, and so the ease of pressing app buttons are the same on both devices. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.

ScoreDisplay size
BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB82/1005.5inch
Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB82/1005.5inch

Which one has a better display, "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" or "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB"?

Pixel density influences how nice your device's screen looks, with high pixel densities making screens look more beautiful, and letting you get more out of your games and movies. Plus, the nicer you screen looks, the less strain you'll be putting on your eyes, so you'll tend to be able to use your device for longer before your eyes get tired.

The screen on the "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" has a 1080 x 1920 resolution and a pixel density of 400ppi. The "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB", on the other hand, has a screen resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a pixel density of 400ppi. There is not much of a difference in the pixel resolutions of the "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB", so they are about the same in terms of clarity of image and gentleness on the eyes. For this reason it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.

ScorePixel density
BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB85/100400ppi
Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB85/100400ppi

How is the battery duration of "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" different from that of "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" ? See the differences

Battery performance has a big effect on the battery life of your device. However, a high battery capacity doesn't necessarily mean a long battery life. Rather, the rate of power consumption needs to be taken into consideration as well. The larger the screen and the higher the CPU performance, the higher the rate of power consumption on your battery.

The "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" has a battery capacity of 3130.0mAh, while the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" has a 3000.0mAh battery. The batteries of both the "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" perform to the same extent. There is also no difference in the battery capacities of the "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" and the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB". Since their battery life is practically identical, it would be better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.

ScoreBattery capacity
BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB66/1003130.0mAh
Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB65/1003000.0mAh

Which is better in terms of CPU function, "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" or "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB"?

Your CPU's speed will influence the processing power of the applications you run, and together with the number of cores in the CPU, as well as its clock frequency, will determine the processing power available for apps. The higher these performance factors, the smoother your games and apps will run. Conversely, if these factors are too low, your apps and games will be sluggish and struggle to run.

The "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" is equipped with a Mediatek MT6755 Helio P10 processor, and its performance speed is 1.8GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). The "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" uses an Mediatek MT6797 Helio X20 CPU that performs at a speed of 2.3GHz+2.0GHz+1.4GHz×10(10.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" has significantly higher specs than the "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB". The "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" proves to be more advanced than the "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" in the way that apps run quickly and games play smoothly. If you're looking for a high-spec smartphone that runs quickly and plays games smoothly, we recommend that you buy the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" rather than the "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB".

ScoreCPU specs
BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB72/1001.8GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores)
Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB90/1002.3GHz+2.0GHz+1.4GHz×10(10.0-cores)

How is "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" different from "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" in terms of memory capacity?

Your device's multimedia performance and app stability are both influenced by the amount of memory it has available. The more memory, the more apps you can use simultaneously, while keeping everything stable and smooth. Plus, there'll be less chance of animations lagging or apps crashing. You also need to keep in mind that some games won't run at all if there's not enough memory available.

The "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" has 4.0GB of memory. The "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB", on the other hand, has 4.0GB. Memory performance is roughly the same for both the "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB"; as a result, multitasking, playing 3D games, and using VR feels the same on both devices. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.

ScoreRAM size
BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB70/1004.0GB
Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB70/1004.0GB

Which has a better storage capacity, "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" or "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB"?

Storage capacity determines the amount of data you'll be able to save on your device. The more storage you have, the more photos you can take and the more apps you can install. Plus, if your smartphone is compatible with SD cards, then you can increase the amount of available storage. However, SD cards have a slower writespeed, making them less desirable in terms of performance, and users should be aware that it won't be possible to transfer all kinds of data to the card.

The "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" has 64.0GB of storage, while the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" has 32.0GB. In terms of ROM and data storage, the "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" has a much larger capacity than the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB", with a difference of about 32GB. The "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" can save more photos and keep more apps installed than the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB". If you're searching for a smartphone that can store more data, we recommended that you buy the "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" rather than the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB".

ScoreStorage size
BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB67/10064.0GB
Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB55/10032.0GB

Compare the rear cameras of "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB". Which one has better picture quality?

One factor in how well your rear camera (the camera on the back of your device) performs is its megapixel count. With a higher megapixel count, you'll be able to take photos with sharper detail, photos that stay clear and sharp even when printed.

The main camera on the "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" has 13.0MP. The "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" has 16.0MP. Comparing the rear camera performance, the number of pixels of the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" is higher than the "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB", with a difference of approximately 3MP. As a result, the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" can take higher quality scenery photos and make clear prints compared to the "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB". Therefore, the "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB" is recommended.

ScoreRear-camera resolution
BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB61/10013.0MP
Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB68/10016.0MP

Which has a front camera with better picture quality, "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" or "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB"?

One indication of how well your forward facing camera (the camera on the same side as your device's screen) performs is how many megapixels it has. More megapixels means you'll be able to take photos with sharper detail, that still look amazing printed out.

The forward-facing camera on the "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" has a resolution of 8.0MP. The "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB"'s has 8.0MP. There is little difference between the camera capabilities and the pixel density of the "BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB" and "Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB"'s front facing cameras, so the quality of photographs and video footage is virtually the same. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.

ScoreFront-camera resolution
BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB58/1008.0MP
Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB58/1008.0MP

Compare Performance Specs

BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GBSharp Z2 (2016) 32GB
ImageBLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GBSharp Z2 (2016) 32GB
MakerBLUSharp
Release date2016-112016-10
ColorGold/Rose goldSilver/Gold
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)74.9mm x 154.3mm x 7.0mm76.0mm x 153.0mm x 8.4mm
Weight170.0g160.0g
Display size5.5inch5.5inch
Display typeIPS LCDLTPS IPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)1080 x 19201080 x 1920
Pixel density400ppi400ppi
Battery capacity3130.0mAh3000.0mAh
ChipsetMediatek MT6755 Helio P10Mediatek MT6797 Helio X20
CPU specs1.8GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores)2.3GHz+2.0GHz+1.4GHz×10(10.0-cores)
RAM size4.0GB4.0GB
Storage size64.0GB32.0GB
Rear-camera resolution13.0MP16.0MP
Front-camera resolution8.0MP8.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

Articles related to BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB
Articles related to Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB

BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB

Articles related to BLU Vivo 6 (2016) 64GB
Articles related to Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB

Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Sharp Z2 (2016) 32GB

New articles