Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Which is better, BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB or BQ Aquaris U 16GB? We compared their features and specs in detail

Created date: 2018-09-30 22:42:54, Updated date: 2021-10-20 18:51:00

BLU Neo X (2016) 4GBBQ Aquaris U 16GB
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GBBQ Aquaris U 16GB

How did the evaluations between the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" differ when we compared the two? We reviewed each of the most commonly scrutinized features. If you are thinking about which smartphone to get, check out this review immediately!

BLU Neo X (2016) 4GBBQ Aquaris U 16GB
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB

BQ Aquaris U 16GB

General rating:
Holding comfortrating-image3.1
73.8mm x 143.0mm x 9.8mm
rating-image3.4
71.5mm x 145.0mm x 8.3mm
Weightrating-image3.5
151.0g
rating-image3.7
140.0g
Screen sizerating-image3.7
5.0inch
rating-image3.7
5.0inch
Display qualityrating-image1.3
195ppi
rating-image3.0
293ppi
Battery liferating-image2.5
2000.0mAh
rating-image3.3
3080.0mAh
Processing powerrating-image1
1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)
rating-image3.0
1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores)
Memory capacityrating-image1
512.0MB
rating-image2.5
2.0GB
Storage capacityrating-image1
4.0GB
rating-image2.5
16.0GB
Rear camera performancerating-image1.4
5.0MP
rating-image3.1
13.0MP
Front camera performancerating-image
rating-image2.5
5.0MP

"BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB", performance comparison

"BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" size comparison. Which to choose?

The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.

The "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" has a width of 73.8mm, a length of 143.0mm, and a thickness of 9.8mm. Also, the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" has a width of 71.5mm, a length of 145.0mm, and a thickness of 8.3mm.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" is smaller and more compact compared to the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB". For that reason, the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" is easier to grip firmly and carry one-handed than the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB". For that reason, we recommend the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB".

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB". For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

Comparing the overall size of the two devices, there isn't a big difference in size between the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB". For that reason the ease of carrying and use with one hand is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreDimensions (width x height x thickness)
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB61/10073.8mm x 143.0mm x 9.8mm
BQ Aquaris U 16GB68/10071.5mm x 145.0mm x 8.3mm

"BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison

The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.

The weight of the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" is about 151.0g, and the weight of the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" is about 140.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, there isn't much difference in weight between the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB". That's why the likelihood of fatigue in the fingers and wrists after extended use is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreWeight
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB69/100151.0g
BQ Aquaris U 16GB74/100140.0g

"BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB", whose display is easier to use?

The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.

The "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" has a 5.0inch display. Also, the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" has a 5.0inch display. Comparing the screen size, there is a negligible difference in screen size between the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB". As a result, the app buttons on both are equally easy to press. We recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreDisplay size
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB74/1005.0inch
BQ Aquaris U 16GB74/1005.0inch

"BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB", which has a clearer display?

Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.

The resolution on the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" is 480 x 854, and pixel density is 195ppi. Also, the resolution on the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" is 720 x 1280, and pixel density is 293ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" has much higher pixel density than the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB", with a difference of roughly 98ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" is superior to the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" over the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB".

ScorePixel density
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB25/100195ppi
BQ Aquaris U 16GB59/100293ppi

"BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB", a summary of the differences in battery life

Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.

The "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" is 2000.0mAh, and the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" is 3080.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" has greater battery capacity than the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB", with a 1080mAh difference. Since the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" can be used for longer periods without recharging than the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB", it is great for outdoor use. If you want a smartphone with a longer battery life, we recommend the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" over the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB".

ScoreBattery capacity
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB50/1002000.0mAh
BQ Aquaris U 16GB66/1003080.0mAh

"BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB", which has better CPU?

CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.

The "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB"'s CPU is a Mediatek MT6580, with performance measured at 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). Also, the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm MSM8937 Snapdragon 430, with performance measured at 1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" has considerably higher specs than the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB". In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" is superior to the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB". If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" over the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB".

ScoreCPU specs
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB16/1001.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)
BQ Aquaris U 16GB60/1001.4GHz×8(8.0-cores)

"BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?

RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.

The weight of the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" is 512.0MB and the weight of the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" is 2.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB", with a difference of about 510GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" is superior to the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" over the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB".

ScoreRAM size
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB5/100512.0MB
BQ Aquaris U 16GB50/1002.0GB

"BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB", which has more data storage?

Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.

The data storage capacity of the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" is 4.0GB. Also the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" is 16.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB", with a roughly 12GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" is superior to the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" over the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB".

ScoreStorage size
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB11/1004.0GB
BQ Aquaris U 16GB50/10016.0GB

"BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" has a 5.0MP main camera. Also, "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB", with a roughly 8MP difference. In terms of taking or shooting high resolution pictures or videos that will look clean when printed, the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" is superior to the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting videos and taking pictures, we recommend the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" over the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB".

ScoreRear-camera resolution
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB27/1005.0MP
BQ Aquaris U 16GB61/10013.0MP

"BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

ScoreFront-camera resolution
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB - /100
BQ Aquaris U 16GB50/1005.0MP

"BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB", performance comparison by specification sheet

BLU Neo X (2016) 4GBBQ Aquaris U 16GB
ImageBLU Neo X (2016) 4GBBQ Aquaris U 16GB
MakerBLUBQ
Release date2016-052016-09
ColorBlack/White/GoldBlack
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)73.8mm x 143.0mm x 9.8mm71.5mm x 145.0mm x 8.3mm
Weight151.0g140.0g
Display size5.0inch5.0inch
Display typeLCDIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)480 x 854720 x 1280
Pixel density195ppi293ppi
Battery capacity2000.0mAh3080.0mAh
ChipsetMediatek MT6580Qualcomm MSM8937 Snapdragon 430
CPU specs1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores)
RAM size512.0MB2.0GB
Storage size4.0GB16.0GB
Rear-camera resolution5.0MP13.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

Articles related to BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB
Articles related to BQ Aquaris U 16GB

BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB

Articles related to BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB
Articles related to BQ Aquaris U 16GB

BQ Aquaris U 16GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as BQ Aquaris U 16GB

New articles