Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB vs Wiko Upulse lite

Created date: 2018-09-30 21:20:05, Updated date: 2020-04-16 18:39:48

BLU Neo X (2016) 4GBWiko Upulse lite
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GBWiko Upulse lite

Are you having trouble comparing the differences in features and performance of the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "Wiko Upulse lite", or unsure about their differences in ease-of-use, and wondering which to buy? We did a deep-dive comparison of the features, specs, and capabilities of these two smartphone, and provided our rating of which one was a better buy.

BLU Neo X (2016) 4GBWiko Upulse lite
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB

Wiko Upulse lite
General rating:
Portabilityrating-image3.1
73.8mm x 143.0mm x 9.8mm
rating-image3.4
72.0mm x 144.0mm x 8.4mm
Weightrating-image3.5
151.0g
rating-image3.4
157.0g
Size of screenrating-image3.7
5.0inch
rating-image3.9
5.2inch
Screen clarityrating-image1.3
195ppi
rating-image2.9
282ppi
Battery durationrating-image2.5
2000.0mAh
rating-image3.3
3000.0mAh
Processing capabilityrating-image1
1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)
rating-image2.5
1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)
Memory capacityrating-image1
512.0MB
rating-image3.0
3.0GB
Storage capacityrating-image1
4.0GB
rating-image2.8
32.0GB
Rear camera functionrating-image1.4
5.0MP
rating-image3.1
13.0MP
Front camera functionrating-image
rating-image2.9
8.0MP

Compare Performance and Usability

Size comparison of "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "Wiko Upulse lite". Which one would you choose?

Your device's size has a huge influence on how easy it is to hold or to operate with one hand. The smaller your device's width, the easier it will be to hold, but you'll also need to take device thickness into account. And when the length and width are both smaller, you'll find that it's much easier for you to operate it one-handed, since your fingers will find it much easier to reach where you want them to. On the other hand, longer lengths and wider widths might lead to devices that are hard to carry in your pocket, bulky even when you keep them in your bag, and all around less portable.

The "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" is 73.8mm wide, 143.0mm tall, and 9.8mm thick. The "Wiko Upulse lite" is 72.0mm tall, 144.0mm wide, and 8.4mm thick.

Comparing the width and thickness of the main unit, the "Wiko Upulse lite" is smaller and more compact compared to the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB". Therefore, it is easier to grip and hold the "Wiko Upulse lite" than the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB". For this reason, the "Wiko Upulse lite" is recommended.

There is no real difference in length or width between the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "Wiko Upulse lite", so they are both about the same in terms of usability, ease of carry, and bulkiness. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.

When comparing their sizes as a whole, there is no real difference between the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB"and "Wiko Upulse lite". Thus they are roughly the same in terms of ease of carry and one-handed use. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.

ScoreDimensions (width x height x thickness)
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB61/10073.8mm x 143.0mm x 9.8mm
Wiko Upulse lite67/10072.0mm x 144.0mm x 8.4mm

Which one is easier to hold, "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" or "Wiko Upulse lite"? Compare weight

The device weight will effect how quickly you tire from holding it, and how much stress is put on your wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you can hold it without feeling tired. Also, less stress on your wrist will make using it easier and more pleasant. Unless the weight is right for you, it might put too much strain on your body and make using it more stressful.

The "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" weighs 151.0g. The "Wiko Upulse lite" clocks in at 157.0g. The "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "Wiko Upulse lite" have around the same weight, so prolonged use will tire out fingers nd wrists to around the same degree. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.

ScoreWeight
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB69/100151.0g
Wiko Upulse lite67/100157.0g

Which is better in terms of display, "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" or "Wiko Upulse lite"?

Screen size influences how well you can control your device, as well as how clear the display is. With a large screen, the text and buttons in apps will display large enough so you'll be less likely to accidentally tap the button next to the one you were aiming for. Plus, you'll be able to enjoy more high-impact visuals for games and movies.

The screen size on the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" is 5.0inch, and 5.2inch on the "Wiko Upulse lite". The screens of the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "Wiko Upulse lite" are roughly the same size, and so the ease of pressing app buttons are the same on both devices. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.

ScoreDisplay size
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB74/1005.0inch
Wiko Upulse lite77/1005.2inch

Which one has a better display, "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" or "Wiko Upulse lite"?

Pixel density influences how nice your device's screen looks, with high pixel densities making screens look more beautiful, and letting you get more out of your games and movies. Plus, the nicer you screen looks, the less strain you'll be putting on your eyes, so you'll tend to be able to use your device for longer before your eyes get tired.

The screen on the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" has a 480 x 854 resolution and a pixel density of 195ppi. The "Wiko Upulse lite", on the other hand, has a screen resolution of 720 x 1280 and a pixel density of 282ppi. Comparing the screen definition, the "Wiko Upulse lite" has a much higher pixel density than the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB", with a difference of about 87ppi. The screen on the "Wiko Upulse lite" is clear and crisp, and puts less strain on the eyes than that of the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB". If you want to choose a smartphone that is gentle on your eyes with a display that shows text and images clearly, we recommend that you buy the "Wiko Upulse lite" rather than the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB".

ScorePixel density
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB25/100195ppi
Wiko Upulse lite57/100282ppi

How is the battery duration of "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" different from that of "Wiko Upulse lite" ? See the differences

Battery performance has a big effect on the battery life of your device. However, a high battery capacity doesn't necessarily mean a long battery life. Rather, the rate of power consumption needs to be taken into consideration as well. The larger the screen and the higher the CPU performance, the higher the rate of power consumption on your battery.

The "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" has a battery capacity of 2000.0mAh, while the "Wiko Upulse lite" has a 3000.0mAh battery. With regards to battery performance, the "Wiko Upulse lite" has a substantially larger battery capacity than the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB", with a difference of 1000mAh. The "Wiko Upulse lite" can be used without charging for a longer time than the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB", so it can be used when out and about. If you want a smartphone with a longer-lasting battery, we recommend that you buy the "Wiko Upulse lite" rather than the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB".

ScoreBattery capacity
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB50/1002000.0mAh
Wiko Upulse lite65/1003000.0mAh

Which is better in terms of CPU function, "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" or "Wiko Upulse lite"?

Your CPU's speed will influence the processing power of the applications you run, and together with the number of cores in the CPU, as well as its clock frequency, will determine the processing power available for apps. The higher these performance factors, the smoother your games and apps will run. Conversely, if these factors are too low, your apps and games will be sluggish and struggle to run.

The "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" is equipped with a Mediatek MT6580 processor, and its performance speed is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The "Wiko Upulse lite" uses an Cortex-A53 CPU that performs at a speed of 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "Wiko Upulse lite" has significantly higher specs than the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB". The "Wiko Upulse lite" proves to be more advanced than the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" in the way that apps run quickly and games play smoothly. If you're looking for a high-spec smartphone that runs quickly and plays games smoothly, we recommend that you buy the "Wiko Upulse lite" rather than the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB".

ScoreCPU specs
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB16/1001.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)
Wiko Upulse lite50/1001.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)

How is "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" different from "Wiko Upulse lite" in terms of memory capacity?

Your device's multimedia performance and app stability are both influenced by the amount of memory it has available. The more memory, the more apps you can use simultaneously, while keeping everything stable and smooth. Plus, there'll be less chance of animations lagging or apps crashing. You also need to keep in mind that some games won't run at all if there's not enough memory available.

The "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" has 512.0MB of memory. The "Wiko Upulse lite", on the other hand, has 3.0GB. As for memory performance, the "Wiko Upulse lite" has a larger memory capacity than the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB", with a difference of about 509GB. The "Wiko Upulse lite" has better multitasking, less crashing, and runs 3D games and VR video better than the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB". If you're looking for a smartphone that will remain stable even when you are using multiple apps at the same time, and which will allow you to play 3D games and VR video comfortably, we recommend that you buy the "Wiko Upulse lite" rather than the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB".

ScoreRAM size
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB5/100512.0MB
Wiko Upulse lite60/1003.0GB

Which has a better storage capacity, "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" or "Wiko Upulse lite"?

Storage capacity determines the amount of data you'll be able to save on your device. The more storage you have, the more photos you can take and the more apps you can install. Plus, if your smartphone is compatible with SD cards, then you can increase the amount of available storage. However, SD cards have a slower writespeed, making them less desirable in terms of performance, and users should be aware that it won't be possible to transfer all kinds of data to the card.

The "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" has 4.0GB of storage, while the "Wiko Upulse lite" has 32.0GB. In terms of ROM and data storage, the "Wiko Upulse lite" has a much larger capacity than the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB", with a difference of about 28GB. The "Wiko Upulse lite" can save more photos and keep more apps installed than the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB". If you're searching for a smartphone that can store more data, we recommended that you buy the "Wiko Upulse lite" rather than the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB".

ScoreStorage size
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB11/1004.0GB
Wiko Upulse lite55/10032.0GB

Compare the rear cameras of "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" and "Wiko Upulse lite". Which one has better picture quality?

One factor in how well your rear camera (the camera on the back of your device) performs is its megapixel count. With a higher megapixel count, you'll be able to take photos with sharper detail, photos that stay clear and sharp even when printed.

The main camera on the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" has 5.0MP. The "Wiko Upulse lite" has 13.0MP. The rear-facing camera of the "Wiko Upulse lite" also has a higher pixel count than the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB", with a difference of about 8MP. The "Wiko Upulse lite" is more capable than the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" of taking high-definition photos and videos, and produces better results when printing out the photos you have taken. If you want a smartphone that is designed for video and photography, we recommend buying the "Wiko Upulse lite" rather than the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB".

ScoreRear-camera resolution
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB27/1005.0MP
Wiko Upulse lite61/10013.0MP

Which has a front camera with better picture quality, "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" or "Wiko Upulse lite"?

One indication of how well your forward facing camera (the camera on the same side as your device's screen) performs is how many megapixels it has. More megapixels means you'll be able to take photos with sharper detail, that still look amazing printed out.

ScoreFront-camera resolution
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB - /100
Wiko Upulse lite58/1008.0MP

Compare Performance Specs

BLU Neo X (2016) 4GBWiko Upulse lite
ImageBLU Neo X (2016) 4GBWiko Upulse lite
MakerBLUWiko
ColorBlack/White/Goldblack,gold,deep bleen,cherry red
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)73.8mm x 143.0mm x 9.8mm72.0mm x 144.0mm x 8.4mm
Weight151.0g157.0g
Display size5.0inch5.2inch
Display typeLCDIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)480 x 854720 x 1280
Pixel density195ppi282ppi
Battery capacity2000.0mAh3000.0mAh
ChipsetMediatek MT6580Cortex-A53
CPU specs1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size512.0MB3.0GB
Storage size4.0GB32.0GB
Rear-camera resolution5.0MP13.0MP

Check price

Articles related to BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB
Articles related to Wiko Upulse lite

BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB

Articles related to BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB
Articles related to Wiko Upulse lite

Wiko Upulse lite

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Wiko Upulse lite

New articles