Which is better, Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB or LG K3 (2016) 8GB? We compared their features and specs in detail
Created date: 2018-09-30 22:20:47, Updated date: 2022-05-31 15:14:45
Are you having trouble comparing the differences in features and performance of the "Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB" and "LG K3 (2016) 8GB", or unsure about their differences in ease-of-use, and wondering which to buy? We did a deep-dive comparison of the features, specs, and capabilities of these two smartphone, and provided our rating of which one was a better buy.
Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB | LG K3 (2016) 8GB | |||
General rating: | 25.8/100 (The 2996th of all smartphones) | 40.8/100 (The 1716th of all smartphones) | ||
Portability | 76/100 | 73/100 | ||
Weight | 80/100 | 79/100 | ||
Size of screen | 58/100 | 66/100 | ||
Screen clarity | 2/100 | 35/100 | ||
Battery duration | 32/100 | 48/100 | ||
Processing capability | 5/100 | 13/100 | ||
Memory capacity | 0/100 | 20/100 | ||
Storage capacity | 0/100 | 24/100 | ||
Rear camera function | 5/100 | 27/100 | ||
Front camera function | - /100 | - /100 | ||
Contents
- 1.Compare Performance and Usability
- 1-0.Which one is easier to hold, "Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB" or "LG K3 (2016) 8GB"? Compare weight
- 1-2.Size comparison of "Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB" and "LG K3 (2016) 8GB". Which one would you choose?
- 1-3.Compare the rear cameras of "Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB" and "LG K3 (2016) 8GB". Which one has better picture quality?
- 1-4.Which has a front camera with better picture quality, "Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB" or "LG K3 (2016) 8GB"?
- 1-5.Which one has a better display, "Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB" or "LG K3 (2016) 8GB"?
- 1-6.Which is better in terms of display, "Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB" or "LG K3 (2016) 8GB"?
- 1-7.Which has a better storage capacity, "Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB" or "LG K3 (2016) 8GB"?
- 1-8.How is "Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB" different from "LG K3 (2016) 8GB" in terms of memory capacity?
- 1-9.Which is better in terms of CPU function, "Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB" or "LG K3 (2016) 8GB"?
- 1-10.How is the battery duration of "Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB" different from that of "LG K3 (2016) 8GB" ? See the differences
- 2.Compare Performance Specs
Compare Performance and Usability
Size comparison of "Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB" and "LG K3 (2016) 8GB". Which one would you choose?
Your device's size has a huge influence on how easy it is to hold or to operate with one hand. The smaller your device's width, the easier it will be to hold, but you'll also need to take device thickness into account. And when the length and width are both smaller, you'll find that it's much easier for you to operate it one-handed, since your fingers will find it much easier to reach where you want them to. On the other hand, longer lengths and wider widths might lead to devices that are hard to carry in your pocket, bulky even when you keep them in your bag, and all around less portable.
The "Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB" is 65.0mm wide, 124.0mm tall, and 10.5mm thick. The "LG K3 (2016) 8GB" is 67.7mm tall, 133.8mm wide, and 9.4mm thick.
There is no real difference between the "Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB" and "LG K3 (2016) 8GB" when comparing their width, thickness, and slimness; they are both around the same in terms of one-handed ease of use and carry. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.
Comparing the width and height of the devices, the "Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB" is more compact than the "LG K3 (2016) 8GB". The "Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB" is easier to carry around than the "LG K3 (2016) 8GB" and easier to use with one hand. For a smartphone that is comfortable and easy to operate with one hand, and can fit neatly in your pocket or bag, we recommend that you buy the "Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB" rather than the "LG K3 (2016) 8GB".
Comparing the overall size of the main unit, the "Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB" is smaller than the "LG K3 (2016) 8GB". As a result, it is easier to use the "Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB" with one hand compared to the "LG K3 (2016) 8GB", and its size makes it more comfortable to carry around. For this reason, the "Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB" is recommended.
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB | 76/100 | 65.0mm x 124.0mm x 10.5mm |
LG K3 (2016) 8GB | 73/100 | 67.7mm x 133.8mm x 9.4mm |
Which one is easier to hold, "Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB" or "LG K3 (2016) 8GB"? Compare weight
The device weight will effect how quickly you tire from holding it, and how much stress is put on your wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you can hold it without feeling tired. Also, less stress on your wrist will make using it easier and more pleasant. Unless the weight is right for you, it might put too much strain on your body and make using it more stressful.
The "Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB" weighs 125.6g. The "LG K3 (2016) 8GB" clocks in at 127.0g. The "Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB" and "LG K3 (2016) 8GB" have around the same weight, so prolonged use will tire out fingers nd wrists to around the same degree. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB | 80/100 | 125.6g |
LG K3 (2016) 8GB | 79/100 | 127.0g |
Which is better in terms of display, "Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB" or "LG K3 (2016) 8GB"?
Screen size influences how well you can control your device, as well as how clear the display is. With a large screen, the text and buttons in apps will display large enough so you'll be less likely to accidentally tap the button next to the one you were aiming for. Plus, you'll be able to enjoy more high-impact visuals for games and movies.
The screen size on the "Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB" is 4.0inch, and 4.5inch on the "LG K3 (2016) 8GB". Comparing the size of the display and screen, the screen size of the "LG K3 (2016) 8GB" is larger than that of the "Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB", with a difference of approximately 0.5inch. As a result, there will be unintended touches on the "LG K3 (2016) 8GB" compared to the "Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB" and it is possible to enjoy games and videos on a large screen. For this reason, the "LG K3 (2016) 8GB" is recommended.
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB | 58/100 | 4.0inch |
LG K3 (2016) 8GB | 66/100 | 4.5inch |
Which one has a better display, "Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB" or "LG K3 (2016) 8GB"?
Pixel density influences how nice your device's screen looks, with high pixel densities making screens look more beautiful, and letting you get more out of your games and movies. Plus, the nicer you screen looks, the less strain you'll be putting on your eyes, so you'll tend to be able to use your device for longer before your eyes get tired.
The screen on the "Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB" has a 320 x 480 resolution and a pixel density of 144ppi. The "LG K3 (2016) 8GB", on the other hand, has a screen resolution of 480 x 854 and a pixel density of 217ppi. Comparing the screen definition, the "LG K3 (2016) 8GB" has a much higher pixel density than the "Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB", with a difference of about 73ppi. The screen on the "LG K3 (2016) 8GB" is clear and crisp, and puts less strain on the eyes than that of the "Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB". If you want to choose a smartphone that is gentle on your eyes with a display that shows text and images clearly, we recommend that you buy the "LG K3 (2016) 8GB" rather than the "Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB".
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB | 2/100 | 144ppi |
LG K3 (2016) 8GB | 35/100 | 217ppi |
How is the battery duration of "Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB" different from that of "LG K3 (2016) 8GB" ? See the differences
Battery performance has a big effect on the battery life of your device. However, a high battery capacity doesn't necessarily mean a long battery life. Rather, the rate of power consumption needs to be taken into consideration as well. The larger the screen and the higher the CPU performance, the higher the rate of power consumption on your battery.
The "Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB" has a battery capacity of 1400.0mAh, while the "LG K3 (2016) 8GB" has a 1940.0mAh battery. With regards to battery performance, the "LG K3 (2016) 8GB" has a substantially larger battery capacity than the "Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB", with a difference of 540mAh. The "LG K3 (2016) 8GB" can be used without charging for a longer time than the "Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB", so it can be used when out and about. If you want a smartphone with a longer-lasting battery, we recommend that you buy the "LG K3 (2016) 8GB" rather than the "Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB".
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB | 32/100 | 1400.0mAh |
LG K3 (2016) 8GB | 48/100 | 1940.0mAh |
Which is better in terms of CPU function, "Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB" or "LG K3 (2016) 8GB"?
Your CPU's speed will influence the processing power of the applications you run, and together with the number of cores in the CPU, as well as its clock frequency, will determine the processing power available for apps. The higher these performance factors, the smoother your games and apps will run. Conversely, if these factors are too low, your apps and games will be sluggish and struggle to run.
The "LG K3 (2016) 8GB" uses an Mediatek MT6737M CPU that performs at a speed of 1.1GHz×4(4.0-cores). Comparing their CPU performance, the "LG K3 (2016) 8GB" has higher specs than the "Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB". For this reason, applications run better on the "LG K3 (2016) 8GB" compared to the "Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB", and games run very smoothly. Therefore, the "LG K3 (2016) 8GB" is recommended.
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB | 5/100 | 1.2GHz×2(2.0-cores) |
LG K3 (2016) 8GB | 13/100 | 1.1GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
How is "Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB" different from "LG K3 (2016) 8GB" in terms of memory capacity?
Your device's multimedia performance and app stability are both influenced by the amount of memory it has available. The more memory, the more apps you can use simultaneously, while keeping everything stable and smooth. Plus, there'll be less chance of animations lagging or apps crashing. You also need to keep in mind that some games won't run at all if there's not enough memory available.
The "Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB" has 256.0MB of memory. The "LG K3 (2016) 8GB", on the other hand, has 1.0GB. As for memory performance, the "LG K3 (2016) 8GB" has a larger memory capacity than the "Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB", with a difference of about 255GB. The "LG K3 (2016) 8GB" has better multitasking, less crashing, and runs 3D games and VR video better than the "Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB". If you're looking for a smartphone that will remain stable even when you are using multiple apps at the same time, and which will allow you to play 3D games and VR video comfortably, we recommend that you buy the "LG K3 (2016) 8GB" rather than the "Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB".
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB | 0/100 | 256.0MB |
LG K3 (2016) 8GB | 20/100 | 1.0GB |
Which has a better storage capacity, "Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB" or "LG K3 (2016) 8GB"?
Storage capacity determines the amount of data you'll be able to save on your device. The more storage you have, the more photos you can take and the more apps you can install. Plus, if your smartphone is compatible with SD cards, then you can increase the amount of available storage. However, SD cards have a slower writespeed, making them less desirable in terms of performance, and users should be aware that it won't be possible to transfer all kinds of data to the card.
The "Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB" has 512.0MB of storage, while the "LG K3 (2016) 8GB" has 8.0GB. In terms of ROM and data storage, the "LG K3 (2016) 8GB" has a much larger capacity than the "Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB", with a difference of about 504GB. The "LG K3 (2016) 8GB" can save more photos and keep more apps installed than the "Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB". If you're searching for a smartphone that can store more data, we recommended that you buy the "LG K3 (2016) 8GB" rather than the "Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB".
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB | 0/100 | 512.0MB |
LG K3 (2016) 8GB | 24/100 | 8.0GB |
Compare the rear cameras of "Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB" and "LG K3 (2016) 8GB". Which one has better picture quality?
One factor in how well your rear camera (the camera on the back of your device) performs is its megapixel count. With a higher megapixel count, you'll be able to take photos with sharper detail, photos that stay clear and sharp even when printed.
The main camera on the "Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB" has 2.0MP. The "LG K3 (2016) 8GB" has 5.0MP. The rear-facing camera of the "LG K3 (2016) 8GB" also has a higher pixel count than the "Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB", with a difference of about 3MP. The "LG K3 (2016) 8GB" is more capable than the "Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB" of taking high-definition photos and videos, and produces better results when printing out the photos you have taken. If you want a smartphone that is designed for video and photography, we recommend buying the "LG K3 (2016) 8GB" rather than the "Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB".
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB | 5/100 | 2.0MP |
LG K3 (2016) 8GB | 27/100 | 5.0MP |
Which has a front camera with better picture quality, "Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB" or "LG K3 (2016) 8GB"?
One indication of how well your forward facing camera (the camera on the same side as your device's screen) performs is how many megapixels it has. More megapixels means you'll be able to take photos with sharper detail, that still look amazing printed out.
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB | - /100 | |
LG K3 (2016) 8GB | - /100 |
Compare Performance Specs
Celkon A64 (2014) 512MB | LG K3 (2016) 8GB | |
Image | ||
Maker | Celkon | LG |
Color | White/Black | Black+Dark BLue |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 65.0mm x 124.0mm x 10.5mm | 67.7mm x 133.8mm x 9.4mm |
Weight | 125.6g | 127.0g |
Display size | 4.0inch | 4.5inch |
Display type | TFT | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 320 x 480 | 480 x 854 |
Pixel density | 144ppi | 217ppi |
Battery capacity | 1400.0mAh | 1940.0mAh |
CPU specs | 1.2GHz×2(2.0-cores) | 1.1GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 256.0MB | 1.0GB |
Storage size | 512.0MB | 8.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 2.0MP | 5.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |