Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Lava Iris 356 512MB vs ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB: Which is the best?

Created date: 2018-09-30 23:23:22, Updated date: 2020-04-16 23:12:32

Lava Iris 356 512MBZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB
Lava Iris 356 512MBZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

Here's our thorough comparison of the difference in performance and function between the "Lava Iris 356 512MB" and "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB". Which one should you buy? We'll compare and explain what differs between the "Lava Iris 356 512MB" and "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" in a way that even people who aren't used to choosing between two similar products can understand.

Lava Iris 356 512MBZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB
Lava Iris 356 512MB

ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

General rating:
Portabilityrating-image3.8
76/100
rating-image2.8
56/100
Weightrating-image4.3
85/100
rating-image3.4
67/100
Size of screenrating-image2.5
50/100
rating-image4.1
82/100
Screen clarityrating-image1
11/100
rating-image2.7
53/100
Battery durationrating-image1.8
35/100
rating-image3.3
65/100
Processing capabilityrating-image1
5/100
rating-image2.0
39/100
Memory capacityrating-image1
0/100
rating-image2.5
50/100
Storage capacityrating-image1
0/100
rating-image2.5
50/100
Rear camera functionrating-image1
12/100
rating-image3.1
61/100
Front camera functionrating-image
- /100
rating-image2.5
50/100

Compare Performance and Usability

Size comparison of "Lava Iris 356 512MB" and "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB". Which one would you choose?

Your device's size has a huge influence on how easy it is to hold or to operate with one hand. The smaller your device's width, the easier it will be to hold, but you'll also need to take device thickness into account. And when the length and width are both smaller, you'll find that it's much easier for you to operate it one-handed, since your fingers will find it much easier to reach where you want them to. On the other hand, longer lengths and wider widths might lead to devices that are hard to carry in your pocket, bulky even when you keep them in your bag, and all around less portable.

The "Lava Iris 356 512MB" is 62.5mm wide, 116.9mm tall, and 12.6mm thick. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is 77.5mm tall, 156.0mm wide, and 8.9mm thick.

The "Lava Iris 356 512MB" is also more compact than the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" in terms of the thickness of the devices. The "Lava Iris 356 512MB" is easier than the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" to hold with one hand, and you are less likely to accidentally drop it. If you're looking for a smartphone that fits nicely in your hand and can be gripped firmly, we recommend buying the "Lava Iris 356 512MB" rather than the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB".

Comparing the width and height of the devices, the "Lava Iris 356 512MB" is more compact than the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB". The "Lava Iris 356 512MB" is easier to carry around than the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and easier to use with one hand. For a smartphone that is comfortable and easy to operate with one hand, and can fit neatly in your pocket or bag, we recommend that you buy the "Lava Iris 356 512MB" rather than the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB".

Comparing the overall sizes, the "Lava Iris 356 512MB" is significantly smaller than the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB". The "Lava Iris 356 512MB" is more convenient than the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" to use with one hand, and it is less likely to get in your way when not using it. If you prefer a smartphone that is easy to carry around and easy to use with one hand, we recommend that you buy the "Lava Iris 356 512MB" rather than the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB".

ScoreDimensions (width x height x thickness)
Lava Iris 356 512MB76/10062.5mm x 116.9mm x 12.6mm
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB56/10077.5mm x 156.0mm x 8.9mm

Which one is easier to hold, "Lava Iris 356 512MB" or "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB"? Compare weight

The device weight will effect how quickly you tire from holding it, and how much stress is put on your wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you can hold it without feeling tired. Also, less stress on your wrist will make using it easier and more pleasant. Unless the weight is right for you, it might put too much strain on your body and make using it more stressful.

The "Lava Iris 356 512MB" weighs 112.0g. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" clocks in at 156.0g. If you compare the weight of the two, the "Lava Iris 356 512MB" is a considerably lighter smartphone than the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB", with a difference of about 44g. Because of this, the "Lava Iris 356 512MB" puts less of a burden on the fingers and wrists than the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB". If you want a smartphone that won't tire your hands out even when using it for a long time, we recommend that you buy the "Lava Iris 356 512MB" rather than the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB".

ScoreWeight
Lava Iris 356 512MB85/100112.0g
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB67/100156.0g

Which is better in terms of display, "Lava Iris 356 512MB" or "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB"?

Screen size influences how well you can control your device, as well as how clear the display is. With a large screen, the text and buttons in apps will display large enough so you'll be less likely to accidentally tap the button next to the one you were aiming for. Plus, you'll be able to enjoy more high-impact visuals for games and movies.

The screen size on the "Lava Iris 356 512MB" is 3.5inch, and 5.5inch on the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB". Comparing the sizes of the screens and displays, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is considerably larger than the "Lava Iris 356 512MB", with a difference of about 2inch. Compared to the "Lava Iris 356 512MB", the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" makes buttons in apps easier to press, and the visuals look more impressive in videos and games. The larger screen of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" also has the advantage of being less tiring on the eyes. If you want to avoid tapping the wrong place, enjoy videos and games on a large screen, and not get tired eyes while using it, we recommend that you buy the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" rather than the "Lava Iris 356 512MB".

ScoreDisplay size
Lava Iris 356 512MB50/1003.5inch
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB82/1005.5inch

Which one has a better display, "Lava Iris 356 512MB" or "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB"?

Pixel density influences how nice your device's screen looks, with high pixel densities making screens look more beautiful, and letting you get more out of your games and movies. Plus, the nicer you screen looks, the less strain you'll be putting on your eyes, so you'll tend to be able to use your device for longer before your eyes get tired.

The screen on the "Lava Iris 356 512MB" has a 320 x 480 resolution and a pixel density of 164ppi. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB", on the other hand, has a screen resolution of 720 x 1280 and a pixel density of 267ppi. Comparing the screen definition, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has a much higher pixel density than the "Lava Iris 356 512MB", with a difference of about 103ppi. The screen on the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is clear and crisp, and puts less strain on the eyes than that of the "Lava Iris 356 512MB". If you want to choose a smartphone that is gentle on your eyes with a display that shows text and images clearly, we recommend that you buy the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" rather than the "Lava Iris 356 512MB".

ScorePixel density
Lava Iris 356 512MB11/100164ppi
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB53/100267ppi

How is the battery duration of "Lava Iris 356 512MB" different from that of "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" ? See the differences

Battery performance has a big effect on the battery life of your device. However, a high battery capacity doesn't necessarily mean a long battery life. Rather, the rate of power consumption needs to be taken into consideration as well. The larger the screen and the higher the CPU performance, the higher the rate of power consumption on your battery.

The "Lava Iris 356 512MB" has a battery capacity of 1500.0mAh, while the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has a 3000.0mAh battery. With regards to battery performance, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has a substantially larger battery capacity than the "Lava Iris 356 512MB", with a difference of 1500mAh. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" can be used without charging for a longer time than the "Lava Iris 356 512MB", so it can be used when out and about. If you want a smartphone with a longer-lasting battery, we recommend that you buy the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" rather than the "Lava Iris 356 512MB".

ScoreBattery capacity
Lava Iris 356 512MB35/1001500.0mAh
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB65/1003000.0mAh

Which is better in terms of CPU function, "Lava Iris 356 512MB" or "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB"?

Your CPU's speed will influence the processing power of the applications you run, and together with the number of cores in the CPU, as well as its clock frequency, will determine the processing power available for apps. The higher these performance factors, the smoother your games and apps will run. Conversely, if these factors are too low, your apps and games will be sluggish and struggle to run.

The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" uses an Qualcomm MSM8917 Snapdragon 425 CPU that performs at a speed of 1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has significantly higher specs than the "Lava Iris 356 512MB". The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" proves to be more advanced than the "Lava Iris 356 512MB" in the way that apps run quickly and games play smoothly. If you're looking for a high-spec smartphone that runs quickly and plays games smoothly, we recommend that you buy the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" rather than the "Lava Iris 356 512MB".

ScoreCPU specs
Lava Iris 356 512MB5/1001.2GHz×2(2.0-cores)
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB39/1001.4GHz×4(4.0-cores)

How is "Lava Iris 356 512MB" different from "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" in terms of memory capacity?

Your device's multimedia performance and app stability are both influenced by the amount of memory it has available. The more memory, the more apps you can use simultaneously, while keeping everything stable and smooth. Plus, there'll be less chance of animations lagging or apps crashing. You also need to keep in mind that some games won't run at all if there's not enough memory available.

The "Lava Iris 356 512MB" has 256.0MB of memory. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB", on the other hand, has 2.0GB. As for memory performance, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has a larger memory capacity than the "Lava Iris 356 512MB", with a difference of about 254GB. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has better multitasking, less crashing, and runs 3D games and VR video better than the "Lava Iris 356 512MB". If you're looking for a smartphone that will remain stable even when you are using multiple apps at the same time, and which will allow you to play 3D games and VR video comfortably, we recommend that you buy the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" rather than the "Lava Iris 356 512MB".

ScoreRAM size
Lava Iris 356 512MB0/100256.0MB
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB50/1002.0GB

Which has a better storage capacity, "Lava Iris 356 512MB" or "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB"?

Storage capacity determines the amount of data you'll be able to save on your device. The more storage you have, the more photos you can take and the more apps you can install. Plus, if your smartphone is compatible with SD cards, then you can increase the amount of available storage. However, SD cards have a slower writespeed, making them less desirable in terms of performance, and users should be aware that it won't be possible to transfer all kinds of data to the card.

The "Lava Iris 356 512MB" has 512.0MB of storage, while the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has 16.0GB. In terms of ROM and data storage, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has a much larger capacity than the "Lava Iris 356 512MB", with a difference of about 496GB. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" can save more photos and keep more apps installed than the "Lava Iris 356 512MB". If you're searching for a smartphone that can store more data, we recommended that you buy the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" rather than the "Lava Iris 356 512MB".

ScoreStorage size
Lava Iris 356 512MB0/100512.0MB
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB50/10016.0GB

Compare the rear cameras of "Lava Iris 356 512MB" and "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB". Which one has better picture quality?

One factor in how well your rear camera (the camera on the back of your device) performs is its megapixel count. With a higher megapixel count, you'll be able to take photos with sharper detail, photos that stay clear and sharp even when printed.

The main camera on the "Lava Iris 356 512MB" has 3.0MP. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has 13.0MP. The rear-facing camera of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" also has a higher pixel count than the "Lava Iris 356 512MB", with a difference of about 10MP. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is more capable than the "Lava Iris 356 512MB" of taking high-definition photos and videos, and produces better results when printing out the photos you have taken. If you want a smartphone that is designed for video and photography, we recommend buying the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" rather than the "Lava Iris 356 512MB".

ScoreRear-camera resolution
Lava Iris 356 512MB12/1003.0MP
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB61/10013.0MP

Which has a front camera with better picture quality, "Lava Iris 356 512MB" or "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB"?

One indication of how well your forward facing camera (the camera on the same side as your device's screen) performs is how many megapixels it has. More megapixels means you'll be able to take photos with sharper detail, that still look amazing printed out.

ScoreFront-camera resolution
Lava Iris 356 512MB - /100
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB50/1005.0MP

Compare Performance Specs

Lava Iris 356 512MBZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB
ImageLava Iris 356 512MBZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB
MakerLavaZTE
Release date2014-042017-10
ColorCrystal White/Black/GreyBlack
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)62.5mm x 116.9mm x 12.6mm77.5mm x 156.0mm x 8.9mm
Weight112.0g156.0g
Display size3.5inch5.5inch
Screen resolution (width x height)320 x 480720 x 1280
Pixel density164ppi267ppi
Battery capacity1500.0mAh3000.0mAh
CPU specs1.2GHz×2(2.0-cores)1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size256.0MB2.0GB
Storage size512.0MB16.0GB
Rear-camera resolution3.0MP13.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

Articles related to Lava Iris 356 512MB
Articles related to ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

Lava Iris 356 512MB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Lava Iris 356 512MB

Articles related to Lava Iris 356 512MB
Articles related to ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

New articles