Compare Lava Iris 503 4GB vs Allview E3 Living 8GB
Created date: 2018-09-30 22:59:37, Updated date: 2020-04-16 20:06:24
Here's our thorough comparison of the difference in performance and function between the "Lava Iris 503 4GB" and "Allview E3 Living 8GB". Which one should you buy? We'll compare and explain what differs between the "Lava Iris 503 4GB" and "Allview E3 Living 8GB" in a way that even people who aren't used to choosing between two similar products can understand.
Contents
- 1."Lava Iris 503 4GB" and "Allview E3 Living 8GB", performance comparison
- 1-0."Lava Iris 503 4GB" and "Allview E3 Living 8GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2."Lava Iris 503 4GB" and "Allview E3 Living 8GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3."Lava Iris 503 4GB" and "Allview E3 Living 8GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4."Lava Iris 503 4GB" and "Allview E3 Living 8GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5."Lava Iris 503 4GB" and "Allview E3 Living 8GB", which has a clearer display?
- 1-6."Lava Iris 503 4GB" and "Allview E3 Living 8GB", whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7."Lava Iris 503 4GB" and "Allview E3 Living 8GB", which has more data storage?
- 1-8."Lava Iris 503 4GB" and "Allview E3 Living 8GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9."Lava Iris 503 4GB" and "Allview E3 Living 8GB", which has better CPU?
- 1-10."Lava Iris 503 4GB" and "Allview E3 Living 8GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2."Lava Iris 503 4GB" and "Allview E3 Living 8GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
"Lava Iris 503 4GB" and "Allview E3 Living 8GB", performance comparison
"Lava Iris 503 4GB" and "Allview E3 Living 8GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The "Lava Iris 503 4GB" has a width of 73.3mm, a length of 143.2mm, and a thickness of 10.5mm. Also, the "Allview E3 Living 8GB" has a width of 65.8mm, a length of 133.3mm, and a thickness of 9.8mm.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Allview E3 Living 8GB" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "Lava Iris 503 4GB". The "Allview E3 Living 8GB" excels over the "Lava Iris 503 4GB" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "Allview E3 Living 8GB" over the "Lava Iris 503 4GB".
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Allview E3 Living 8GB" is a more compact size than the "Lava Iris 503 4GB". For that reason the "Allview E3 Living 8GB" has higher one-handed operability, and has greater portability, being less likely to get in the way when being carried. For these reasons, we recommend the "Allview E3 Living 8GB".
Comparing the overall size of the two devices, the "Allview E3 Living 8GB" is a considerably larger size than the "Lava Iris 503 4GB". In terms of being more convenient to use one-handed, and less likely to get in the way when you're not using it, the "Allview E3 Living 8GB" is superior to the "Lava Iris 503 4GB". If you're going for the smart phone sized to be easiest to carry and handle with one hand, we recommend buying the "Allview E3 Living 8GB" over the "Lava Iris 503 4GB".
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
Lava Iris 503 4GB | 61/100 | 73.3mm x 143.2mm x 10.5mm |
Allview E3 Living 8GB | 75/100 | 65.8mm x 133.3mm x 9.8mm |
"Lava Iris 503 4GB" and "Allview E3 Living 8GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
The weight of the "Lava Iris 503 4GB" is about 175.0g, and the weight of the "Allview E3 Living 8GB" is about 135.5g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "Allview E3 Living 8GB" is a considerably lighter smart phone than the "Lava Iris 503 4GB", and there is a difference of about 39.5g. In terms of the burden placed upon your fingers and wrist, the "Allview E3 Living 8GB" is superior to the "Lava Iris 503 4GB". If you are going for a smart phone that won't lead to hand fatigue even after extended use, and is less likely to place a burden on your fingers, we recommend purchasing the "Allview E3 Living 8GB" over the "Lava Iris 503 4GB".
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
Lava Iris 503 4GB | 60/100 | 175.0g |
Allview E3 Living 8GB | 76/100 | 135.5g |
"Lava Iris 503 4GB" and "Allview E3 Living 8GB", whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The "Lava Iris 503 4GB" has a 5.0inch display. Also, the "Allview E3 Living 8GB" has a 4.5inch display. Comparing the screen size, the "Lava Iris 503 4GB" has a larger screen compared to the "Allview E3 Living 8GB", with a roughly 0.5inch difference. As a result, the user is less likely to mistap when using apps on the "Lava Iris 503 4GB" than on the "Allview E3 Living 8GB", and is also able to enjoy videos and games on a larger screen. Therefore, we recommend the "Lava Iris 503 4GB".
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
Lava Iris 503 4GB | 74/100 | 5.0inch |
Allview E3 Living 8GB | 66/100 | 4.5inch |
"Lava Iris 503 4GB" and "Allview E3 Living 8GB", which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the "Lava Iris 503 4GB" is 540 x 960, and pixel density is 220ppi. Also, the resolution on the "Allview E3 Living 8GB" is 480 x 854, and pixel density is 217ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the difference in pixel density between the "Lava Iris 503 4GB" and the "Allview E3 Living 8GB" is negligible. As a result, they are both evenly matched in terms of picture quality and easiness on the eyes. Therefore, we recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
Lava Iris 503 4GB | 36/100 | 220ppi |
Allview E3 Living 8GB | 35/100 | 217ppi |
"Lava Iris 503 4GB" and "Allview E3 Living 8GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
The "Lava Iris 503 4GB" is 2000.0mAh, and the "Allview E3 Living 8GB" is 1850.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, there is a negligible difference in battery capacity between the "Lava Iris 503 4GB" and "Allview E3 Living 8GB". Since both have roughly equal battery life, you are better off comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
Lava Iris 503 4GB | 50/100 | 2000.0mAh |
Allview E3 Living 8GB | 45/100 | 1850.0mAh |
Want to read it together
"Lava Iris 503 4GB" and "Allview E3 Living 8GB", which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
Also, the "Allview E3 Living 8GB"'s CPU is a Mediatek MT6735, with performance measured at 1.0GHz×4(4.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "Allview E3 Living 8GB" has higher specs compared to the "Lava Iris 503 4GB". For that reason, the "Allview E3 Living 8GB" allows for more comfortable use of apps, and games that run more smoothly. That's why we recommend the "Allview E3 Living 8GB" over the "Lava Iris 503 4GB".
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
Lava Iris 503 4GB | 4/100 | 1.0GHz×2(2.0-cores) |
Allview E3 Living 8GB | 11/100 | 1.0GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
"Lava Iris 503 4GB" and "Allview E3 Living 8GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
The weight of the "Lava Iris 503 4GB" is 512.0MB and the weight of the "Allview E3 Living 8GB" is 1.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "Allview E3 Living 8GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "Lava Iris 503 4GB", with a difference of about 511GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "Allview E3 Living 8GB" is superior to the "Lava Iris 503 4GB". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "Allview E3 Living 8GB" over the "Lava Iris 503 4GB".
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
Lava Iris 503 4GB | 5/100 | 512.0MB |
Allview E3 Living 8GB | 20/100 | 1.0GB |
"Lava Iris 503 4GB" and "Allview E3 Living 8GB", which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the "Lava Iris 503 4GB" is 4.0GB. Also the "Allview E3 Living 8GB" is 8.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "Allview E3 Living 8GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "Lava Iris 503 4GB", with a roughly 4GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "Allview E3 Living 8GB" is superior to the "Lava Iris 503 4GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "Allview E3 Living 8GB" over the "Lava Iris 503 4GB".
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
Lava Iris 503 4GB | 11/100 | 4.0GB |
Allview E3 Living 8GB | 24/100 | 8.0GB |
"Lava Iris 503 4GB" and "Allview E3 Living 8GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Lava Iris 503 4GB" has a 15.0MP main camera. Also, "Allview E3 Living 8GB" has a 8.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Lava Iris 503 4GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Allview E3 Living 8GB", with a roughly 7MP difference. In terms of taking or shooting high resolution pictures or videos that will look clean when printed, the "Lava Iris 503 4GB" is superior to the "Allview E3 Living 8GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting videos and taking pictures, we recommend the "Lava Iris 503 4GB" over the "Allview E3 Living 8GB".
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Lava Iris 503 4GB | 66/100 | 15.0MP |
Allview E3 Living 8GB | 50/100 | 8.0MP |
"Lava Iris 503 4GB" and "Allview E3 Living 8GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Lava Iris 503 4GB" has an 3.0MP front camera and "Allview E3 Living 8GB" has an 2.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "Lava Iris 503 4GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Allview E3 Living 8GB", with a roughly 1MP difference. As a result, the "Lava Iris 503 4GB" is more suited than the "Allview E3 Living 8GB" for shooting videos and taking pictures. If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting high resolution selfies which will look clean when printed, we recommend the "Lava Iris 503 4GB" over the "Allview E3 Living 8GB".
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Lava Iris 503 4GB | 27/100 | 3.0MP |
Allview E3 Living 8GB | 15/100 | 2.0MP |
"Lava Iris 503 4GB" and "Allview E3 Living 8GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
Lava Iris 503 4GB | Allview E3 Living 8GB | |
Image | ||
Maker | Lava | Allview |
Release date | 2013-10 | 2015-08 |
Color | Black | Black/White |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 73.3mm x 143.2mm x 10.5mm | 65.8mm x 133.3mm x 9.8mm |
Weight | 175.0g | 135.5g |
Display size | 5.0inch | 4.5inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 540 x 960 | 480 x 854 |
Pixel density | 220ppi | 217ppi |
Battery capacity | 2000.0mAh | 1850.0mAh |
CPU specs | 1.0GHz×2(2.0-cores) | 1.0GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 512.0MB | 1.0GB |
Storage size | 4.0GB | 8.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 15.0MP | 8.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 3.0MP | 2.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |