Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Micromax Canvas Spark 2 Q334 4GB vs. BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB Specs & Scores

Created date: 2018-09-30 22:30:04, Updated date: 2020-04-16 21:51:45

Micromax Canvas Spark 2 Q334 4GBBLU Neo X (2016) 4GB
Micromax Canvas Spark 2 Q334 4GBBLU Neo X (2016) 4GB

How did the evaluations between the "Micromax Canvas Spark 2 Q334 4GB" and "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" differ when we compared the two? We reviewed each of the most commonly scrutinized features. If you are thinking about which smartphone to get, check out this review immediately!

Micromax Canvas Spark 2 Q334 4GBBLU Neo X (2016) 4GB
Micromax Canvas Spark 2 Q334 4GB

BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB

General rating:
Portabilityrating-image3.2
63/100
rating-image3.1
61/100
Weightrating-image3.4
68/100
rating-image3.5
69/100
Size of screenrating-image3.7
74/100
rating-image3.7
74/100
Screen clarityrating-image1.3
25/100
rating-image1.3
25/100
Battery durationrating-image2.2
44/100
rating-image2.5
50/100
Processing capabilityrating-image1
16/100
rating-image1
16/100
Memory capacityrating-image1
12/100
rating-image1
5/100
Storage capacityrating-image1
11/100
rating-image1
11/100
Rear camera functionrating-image1.4
27/100
rating-image1.4
27/100
Front camera functionrating-image1
15/100
rating-image
- /100

Compare Performance and Usability

Size comparison of "Micromax Canvas Spark 2 Q334 4GB" and "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB". Which one would you choose?

Your device's size has a huge influence on how easy it is to hold or to operate with one hand. The smaller your device's width, the easier it will be to hold, but you'll also need to take device thickness into account. And when the length and width are both smaller, you'll find that it's much easier for you to operate it one-handed, since your fingers will find it much easier to reach where you want them to. On the other hand, longer lengths and wider widths might lead to devices that are hard to carry in your pocket, bulky even when you keep them in your bag, and all around less portable.

The "Micromax Canvas Spark 2 Q334 4GB" is 73.2mm wide, 145.2mm tall, and 9.1mm thick. The "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" is 73.8mm tall, 143.0mm wide, and 9.8mm thick.

There is no real difference between the "Micromax Canvas Spark 2 Q334 4GB" and "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" when comparing their width, thickness, and slimness; they are both around the same in terms of one-handed ease of use and carry. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.

There is no real difference in length or width between the "Micromax Canvas Spark 2 Q334 4GB" and "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB", so they are both about the same in terms of usability, ease of carry, and bulkiness. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.

When comparing their sizes as a whole, there is no real difference between the "Micromax Canvas Spark 2 Q334 4GB"and "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB". Thus they are roughly the same in terms of ease of carry and one-handed use. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.

ScoreDimensions (width x height x thickness)
Micromax Canvas Spark 2 Q334 4GB63/10073.2mm x 145.2mm x 9.1mm
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB61/10073.8mm x 143.0mm x 9.8mm

Which one is easier to hold, "Micromax Canvas Spark 2 Q334 4GB" or "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB"? Compare weight

The device weight will effect how quickly you tire from holding it, and how much stress is put on your wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you can hold it without feeling tired. Also, less stress on your wrist will make using it easier and more pleasant. Unless the weight is right for you, it might put too much strain on your body and make using it more stressful.

The "Micromax Canvas Spark 2 Q334 4GB" weighs 154.0g. The "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" clocks in at 151.0g. The "Micromax Canvas Spark 2 Q334 4GB" and "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" have around the same weight, so prolonged use will tire out fingers nd wrists to around the same degree. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.

ScoreWeight
Micromax Canvas Spark 2 Q334 4GB68/100154.0g
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB69/100151.0g

Which is better in terms of display, "Micromax Canvas Spark 2 Q334 4GB" or "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB"?

Screen size influences how well you can control your device, as well as how clear the display is. With a large screen, the text and buttons in apps will display large enough so you'll be less likely to accidentally tap the button next to the one you were aiming for. Plus, you'll be able to enjoy more high-impact visuals for games and movies.

The screen size on the "Micromax Canvas Spark 2 Q334 4GB" is 5.0inch, and 5.0inch on the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB". The screens of the "Micromax Canvas Spark 2 Q334 4GB" and "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" are roughly the same size, and so the ease of pressing app buttons are the same on both devices. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.

ScoreDisplay size
Micromax Canvas Spark 2 Q334 4GB74/1005.0inch
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB74/1005.0inch

Which one has a better display, "Micromax Canvas Spark 2 Q334 4GB" or "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB"?

Pixel density influences how nice your device's screen looks, with high pixel densities making screens look more beautiful, and letting you get more out of your games and movies. Plus, the nicer you screen looks, the less strain you'll be putting on your eyes, so you'll tend to be able to use your device for longer before your eyes get tired.

The screen on the "Micromax Canvas Spark 2 Q334 4GB" has a 480 x 854 resolution and a pixel density of 195ppi. The "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB", on the other hand, has a screen resolution of 480 x 854 and a pixel density of 195ppi. There is not much of a difference in the pixel resolutions of the "Micromax Canvas Spark 2 Q334 4GB" and "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB", so they are about the same in terms of clarity of image and gentleness on the eyes. For this reason it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.

ScorePixel density
Micromax Canvas Spark 2 Q334 4GB25/100195ppi
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB25/100195ppi

How is the battery duration of "Micromax Canvas Spark 2 Q334 4GB" different from that of "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" ? See the differences

Battery performance has a big effect on the battery life of your device. However, a high battery capacity doesn't necessarily mean a long battery life. Rather, the rate of power consumption needs to be taken into consideration as well. The larger the screen and the higher the CPU performance, the higher the rate of power consumption on your battery.

The "Micromax Canvas Spark 2 Q334 4GB" has a battery capacity of 1800.0mAh, while the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" has a 2000.0mAh battery. Regarding the battery performance, the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" has a larger battery capacity than the "Micromax Canvas Spark 2 Q334 4GB", with a difference of 200mAh. If you are choosing based on the battery, the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" is recommended over the "Micromax Canvas Spark 2 Q334 4GB".

ScoreBattery capacity
Micromax Canvas Spark 2 Q334 4GB44/1001800.0mAh
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB50/1002000.0mAh

Which is better in terms of CPU function, "Micromax Canvas Spark 2 Q334 4GB" or "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB"?

Your CPU's speed will influence the processing power of the applications you run, and together with the number of cores in the CPU, as well as its clock frequency, will determine the processing power available for apps. The higher these performance factors, the smoother your games and apps will run. Conversely, if these factors are too low, your apps and games will be sluggish and struggle to run.

The "Micromax Canvas Spark 2 Q334 4GB" is equipped with a Mediatek MT6580M processor, and its performance speed is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" uses an Mediatek MT6580 CPU that performs at a speed of 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). There is also no real discrepancy between the CPU performances of the "Micromax Canvas Spark 2 Q334 4GB" and "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB". Because of this, both phones will feel practically identical in terms of smoothness when running apps and ease of game play. This is why it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.

ScoreCPU specs
Micromax Canvas Spark 2 Q334 4GB16/1001.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB16/1001.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)

How is "Micromax Canvas Spark 2 Q334 4GB" different from "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" in terms of memory capacity?

Your device's multimedia performance and app stability are both influenced by the amount of memory it has available. The more memory, the more apps you can use simultaneously, while keeping everything stable and smooth. Plus, there'll be less chance of animations lagging or apps crashing. You also need to keep in mind that some games won't run at all if there's not enough memory available.

The "Micromax Canvas Spark 2 Q334 4GB" has 768.0MB of memory. The "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB", on the other hand, has 512.0MB. Comparing the memory performance, the "Micromax Canvas Spark 2 Q334 4GB" has a larger memory capacity than the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB", with a difference of approximately 256MB. For this reason, multitasking is smoother on the "Micromax Canvas Spark 2 Q334 4GB" than the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB", and applications are less likely to crash. Also, it is more enjoyable to play 3D games and VR on the "Micromax Canvas Spark 2 Q334 4GB". For this reason, the "Micromax Canvas Spark 2 Q334 4GB" is recommended.

ScoreRAM size
Micromax Canvas Spark 2 Q334 4GB12/100768.0MB
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB5/100512.0MB

Which has a better storage capacity, "Micromax Canvas Spark 2 Q334 4GB" or "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB"?

Storage capacity determines the amount of data you'll be able to save on your device. The more storage you have, the more photos you can take and the more apps you can install. Plus, if your smartphone is compatible with SD cards, then you can increase the amount of available storage. However, SD cards have a slower writespeed, making them less desirable in terms of performance, and users should be aware that it won't be possible to transfer all kinds of data to the card.

The "Micromax Canvas Spark 2 Q334 4GB" has 4.0GB of storage, while the "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" has 4.0GB. There is no real difference between the "Micromax Canvas Spark 2 Q334 4GB"and "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" 's ROMs and storage capacities, so both can store roughly the same amount of photographs and apps. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.

ScoreStorage size
Micromax Canvas Spark 2 Q334 4GB11/1004.0GB
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB11/1004.0GB

Compare the rear cameras of "Micromax Canvas Spark 2 Q334 4GB" and "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB". Which one has better picture quality?

One factor in how well your rear camera (the camera on the back of your device) performs is its megapixel count. With a higher megapixel count, you'll be able to take photos with sharper detail, photos that stay clear and sharp even when printed.

The main camera on the "Micromax Canvas Spark 2 Q334 4GB" has 5.0MP. The "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" has 5.0MP. The rear facing cameras of the "Micromax Canvas Spark 2 Q334 4GB" and "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB" have roughly the same performance, so the quality of the photograph and video footage they can capture is around the same. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.

ScoreRear-camera resolution
Micromax Canvas Spark 2 Q334 4GB27/1005.0MP
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB27/1005.0MP

Which has a front camera with better picture quality, "Micromax Canvas Spark 2 Q334 4GB" or "BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB"?

One indication of how well your forward facing camera (the camera on the same side as your device's screen) performs is how many megapixels it has. More megapixels means you'll be able to take photos with sharper detail, that still look amazing printed out.

ScoreFront-camera resolution
Micromax Canvas Spark 2 Q334 4GB15/1002.0MP
BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB - /100

Compare Performance Specs

Micromax Canvas Spark 2 Q334 4GBBLU Neo X (2016) 4GB
ImageMicromax Canvas Spark 2 Q334 4GBBLU Neo X (2016) 4GB
MakerMicromaxBLU
Release date2015-092016-05
ColorBlackBlack/White/Gold
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)73.2mm x 145.2mm x 9.1mm73.8mm x 143.0mm x 9.8mm
Weight154.0g151.0g
Display size5.0inch5.0inch
Display typeIPS LCDLCD
Screen resolution (width x height)480 x 854480 x 854
Pixel density195ppi195ppi
Battery capacity1800.0mAh2000.0mAh
ChipsetMediatek MT6580MMediatek MT6580
CPU specs1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size768.0MB512.0MB
Storage size4.0GB4.0GB
Rear-camera resolution5.0MP5.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

Articles related to Micromax Canvas Spark 2 Q334 4GB
Articles related to BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB

Micromax Canvas Spark 2 Q334 4GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Micromax Canvas Spark 2 Q334 4GB

Articles related to Micromax Canvas Spark 2 Q334 4GB
Articles related to BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB

BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as BLU Neo X (2016) 4GB

New articles