Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Lenovo A2010 (2015) 8GB vs XOLO Q900s Plus 8GB: Full Comparison!

Created date: 2018-09-30 22:43:07, Updated date: 2021-10-20 14:47:08

Lenovo A2010 (2015) 8GBXOLO Q900s Plus 8GB
Lenovo A2010 (2015) 8GBXOLO Q900s Plus 8GB

Are you having trouble comparing the differences in features and performance of the "Lenovo A2010 (2015) 8GB" and "XOLO Q900s Plus 8GB", or unsure about their differences in ease-of-use, and wondering which to buy? We did a deep-dive comparison of the features, specs, and capabilities of these two smartphone, and provided our rating of which one was a better buy.

Lenovo A2010 (2015) 8GBXOLO Q900s Plus 8GB
Lenovo A2010 (2015) 8GB

XOLO Q900s Plus 8GB

General rating:
Holding comfortrating-image3.7
74/100
rating-image3.9
78/100
Weightrating-image3.8
75/100
rating-image4.5
90/100
Screen sizerating-image3.3
66/100
rating-image3.5
69/100
Display qualityrating-image1.8
35/100
rating-image3.2
64/100
Battery liferating-image2.5
50/100
rating-image2.2
44/100
Processing powerrating-image1
11/100
rating-image1
14/100
Memory capacityrating-image1.0
20/100
rating-image1.0
20/100
Storage capacityrating-image1.2
24/100
rating-image1.2
24/100
Rear camera performancerating-image1.4
27/100
rating-image2.5
50/100
Front camera performancerating-image1
15/100
rating-image1
15/100

"Lenovo A2010 (2015) 8GB" and "XOLO Q900s Plus 8GB", performance comparison

"Lenovo A2010 (2015) 8GB" and "XOLO Q900s Plus 8GB" size comparison. Which to choose?

The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.

The "Lenovo A2010 (2015) 8GB" has a width of 66.5mm, a length of 131.5mm, and a thickness of 9.9mm. Also, the "XOLO Q900s Plus 8GB" has a width of 67.2mm, a length of 135.8mm, and a thickness of 7.2mm.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't much difference between the "Lenovo A2010 (2015) 8GB" and "XOLO Q900s Plus 8GB" in terms of size. For that reason, the ease of gripping and carrying the devices in one hand is about the same for both. Therefore it's better to compare them in terms of performance and functionality.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the "Lenovo A2010 (2015) 8GB" and the "XOLO Q900s Plus 8GB". For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

Comparing the overall size of the two devices, there isn't a big difference in size between the "Lenovo A2010 (2015) 8GB" and the "XOLO Q900s Plus 8GB". For that reason the ease of carrying and use with one hand is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreDimensions (width x height x thickness)
Lenovo A2010 (2015) 8GB74/10066.5mm x 131.5mm x 9.9mm
XOLO Q900s Plus 8GB78/10067.2mm x 135.8mm x 7.2mm

"Lenovo A2010 (2015) 8GB" and "XOLO Q900s Plus 8GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison

The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.

The weight of the "Lenovo A2010 (2015) 8GB" is about 137.0g, and the weight of the "XOLO Q900s Plus 8GB" is about 100.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "XOLO Q900s Plus 8GB" is a considerably lighter smart phone than the "Lenovo A2010 (2015) 8GB", and there is a difference of about 37g. In terms of the burden placed upon your fingers and wrist, the "XOLO Q900s Plus 8GB" is superior to the "Lenovo A2010 (2015) 8GB". If you are going for a smart phone that won't lead to hand fatigue even after extended use, and is less likely to place a burden on your fingers, we recommend purchasing the "XOLO Q900s Plus 8GB" over the "Lenovo A2010 (2015) 8GB".

ScoreWeight
Lenovo A2010 (2015) 8GB75/100137.0g
XOLO Q900s Plus 8GB90/100100.0g

"Lenovo A2010 (2015) 8GB" and "XOLO Q900s Plus 8GB", whose display is easier to use?

The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.

The "Lenovo A2010 (2015) 8GB" has a 4.5inch display. Also, the "XOLO Q900s Plus 8GB" has a 4.7inch display. Comparing the screen size, there is a negligible difference in screen size between the "Lenovo A2010 (2015) 8GB" and the "XOLO Q900s Plus 8GB". As a result, the app buttons on both are equally easy to press. We recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreDisplay size
Lenovo A2010 (2015) 8GB66/1004.5inch
XOLO Q900s Plus 8GB69/1004.7inch

"Lenovo A2010 (2015) 8GB" and "XOLO Q900s Plus 8GB", which has a clearer display?

Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.

The resolution on the "Lenovo A2010 (2015) 8GB" is 480 x 854, and pixel density is 217ppi. Also, the resolution on the "XOLO Q900s Plus 8GB" is 720 x 1280, and pixel density is 312ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "XOLO Q900s Plus 8GB" has much higher pixel density than the "Lenovo A2010 (2015) 8GB", with a difference of roughly 95ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "XOLO Q900s Plus 8GB" is superior to the "Lenovo A2010 (2015) 8GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "XOLO Q900s Plus 8GB" over the "Lenovo A2010 (2015) 8GB".

ScorePixel density
Lenovo A2010 (2015) 8GB35/100217ppi
XOLO Q900s Plus 8GB64/100312ppi

"Lenovo A2010 (2015) 8GB" and "XOLO Q900s Plus 8GB", a summary of the differences in battery life

Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.

The "Lenovo A2010 (2015) 8GB" is 2000.0mAh, and the "XOLO Q900s Plus 8GB" is 1800.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "Lenovo A2010 (2015) 8GB" has greater battery capacity than the "XOLO Q900s Plus 8GB", with a 200mAh difference. If battery is a priority, then the "Lenovo A2010 (2015) 8GB" is recommended over the "XOLO Q900s Plus 8GB".

ScoreBattery capacity
Lenovo A2010 (2015) 8GB50/1002000.0mAh
XOLO Q900s Plus 8GB44/1001800.0mAh

"Lenovo A2010 (2015) 8GB" and "XOLO Q900s Plus 8GB", which has better CPU?

CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.

The "Lenovo A2010 (2015) 8GB"'s CPU is a Mediatek MT6735M, with performance measured at 1.0GHz×4(4.0-cores). Also, the "XOLO Q900s Plus 8GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm MSM8212 Snapdragon 200, with performance measured at 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, there is almost no difference in the specs of the "Lenovo A2010 (2015) 8GB" and the "XOLO Q900s Plus 8GB". For that reason the level of smoothness felt when using apps and comfortable handling of games is about the same. For that reason it is better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreCPU specs
Lenovo A2010 (2015) 8GB11/1001.0GHz×4(4.0-cores)
XOLO Q900s Plus 8GB14/1001.2GHz×4(4.0-cores)

"Lenovo A2010 (2015) 8GB" and "XOLO Q900s Plus 8GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?

RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.

The weight of the "Lenovo A2010 (2015) 8GB" is 1.0GB and the weight of the "XOLO Q900s Plus 8GB" is 1.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, there is almost no difference in the amount of RAM of the "Lenovo A2010 (2015) 8GB" and the "XOLO Q900s Plus 8GB". For that reason they have about the same level of multitasking performance and 3D game and VR smoothness. That's why it is better to make a comparison in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreRAM size
Lenovo A2010 (2015) 8GB20/1001.0GB
XOLO Q900s Plus 8GB20/1001.0GB

"Lenovo A2010 (2015) 8GB" and "XOLO Q900s Plus 8GB", which has more data storage?

Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.

The data storage capacity of the "Lenovo A2010 (2015) 8GB" is 8.0GB. Also the "XOLO Q900s Plus 8GB" is 8.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, there is a negligible difference in storage capacity between the "Lenovo A2010 (2015) 8GB" and "XOLO Q900s Plus 8GB". As a result, you can save roughly the same amount of pictures, and install roughly the same amount of applications, on either phone. You are better off comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreStorage size
Lenovo A2010 (2015) 8GB24/1008.0GB
XOLO Q900s Plus 8GB24/1008.0GB

"Lenovo A2010 (2015) 8GB" and "XOLO Q900s Plus 8GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"Lenovo A2010 (2015) 8GB" has a 5.0MP main camera. Also, "XOLO Q900s Plus 8GB" has a 8.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "XOLO Q900s Plus 8GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Lenovo A2010 (2015) 8GB", with a roughly 3MP difference. In terms of taking or shooting high resolution pictures or videos that will look clean when printed, the "XOLO Q900s Plus 8GB" is superior to the "Lenovo A2010 (2015) 8GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting videos and taking pictures, we recommend the "XOLO Q900s Plus 8GB" over the "Lenovo A2010 (2015) 8GB".

ScoreRear-camera resolution
Lenovo A2010 (2015) 8GB27/1005.0MP
XOLO Q900s Plus 8GB50/1008.0MP

"Lenovo A2010 (2015) 8GB" and "XOLO Q900s Plus 8GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"Lenovo A2010 (2015) 8GB" has an 2.0MP front camera and "XOLO Q900s Plus 8GB" has an 2.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Lenovo A2010 (2015) 8GB" and "XOLO Q900s Plus 8GB" have approximately the same pixel count. As a result, they can both take pictures and shoot videos of roughly the same quality. Therefore, we recommend comparing the two based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreFront-camera resolution
Lenovo A2010 (2015) 8GB15/1002.0MP
XOLO Q900s Plus 8GB15/1002.0MP

"Lenovo A2010 (2015) 8GB" and "XOLO Q900s Plus 8GB", performance comparison by specification sheet

Lenovo A2010 (2015) 8GBXOLO Q900s Plus 8GB
ImageLenovo A2010 (2015) 8GBXOLO Q900s Plus 8GB
MakerLenovoXOLO
Release date2015-092014-07
ColorBlack/Pearl WhiteBlack/White
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)66.5mm x 131.5mm x 9.9mm67.2mm x 135.8mm x 7.2mm
Weight137.0g100.0g
Display size4.5inch4.7inch
Display typeTFTIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)480 x 854720 x 1280
Pixel density217ppi312ppi
Battery capacity2000.0mAh1800.0mAh
ChipsetMediatek MT6735MQualcomm MSM8212 Snapdragon 200
CPU specs1.0GHz×4(4.0-cores)1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size1.0GB1.0GB
Storage size8.0GB8.0GB
Rear-camera resolution5.0MP8.0MP
Front-camera resolution2.0MP2.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

Articles related to Lenovo A2010 (2015) 8GB
Articles related to XOLO Q900s Plus 8GB

Lenovo A2010 (2015) 8GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Lenovo A2010 (2015) 8GB

Articles related to Lenovo A2010 (2015) 8GB
Articles related to XOLO Q900s Plus 8GB

XOLO Q900s Plus 8GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as XOLO Q900s Plus 8GB

New articles