Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB vs XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB: Full Comparison!
Created date: 2018-09-30 22:49:35, Updated date: 2021-10-20 16:55:21
Are you having trouble comparing the differences in features and performance of the "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" and "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB", or unsure about their differences in ease-of-use, and wondering which to buy? We did a deep-dive comparison of the features, specs, and capabilities of these two smartphone, and provided our rating of which one was a better buy.
Contents
- 1."Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" and "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB", performance comparison
- 1-0."Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" and "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2."Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" and "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3."Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" and "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4."Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" and "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5."Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" and "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB", which has a clearer display?
- 1-6."Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" and "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB", whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7."Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" and "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB", which has more data storage?
- 1-8."Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" and "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9."Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" and "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB", which has better CPU?
- 1-10."Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" and "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2."Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" and "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
"Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" and "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB", performance comparison
"Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" and "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" has a width of 72.0mm, a length of 143.0mm, and a thickness of 7.6mm. Also, the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" has a width of 67.2mm, a length of 135.8mm, and a thickness of 7.2mm.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" is smaller and more compact compared to the "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB". For that reason, the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" is easier to grip firmly and carry one-handed than the "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB". For that reason, we recommend the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB".
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" is a more compact size than the "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB". For that reason the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" has higher one-handed operability, and has greater portability, being less likely to get in the way when being carried. For these reasons, we recommend the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB".
Comparing the overall size of the two devices, the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" has a large size compared to the "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB". For that reason the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" is a size that is easier to use in one hand and comfortably carry than the "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB". That's why we recommend the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB".
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB | 68/100 | 72.0mm x 143.0mm x 7.6mm |
XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB | 78/100 | 67.2mm x 135.8mm x 7.2mm |
"Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" and "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
The weight of the "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" is about 126.0g, and the weight of the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" is about 100.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" is a considerably lighter smart phone than the "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB", and there is a difference of about 26g. In terms of the burden placed upon your fingers and wrist, the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" is superior to the "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB". If you are going for a smart phone that won't lead to hand fatigue even after extended use, and is less likely to place a burden on your fingers, we recommend purchasing the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" over the "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB".
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB | 79/100 | 126.0g |
XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB | 90/100 | 100.0g |
"Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" and "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB", whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" has a 5.0inch display. Also, the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" has a 4.7inch display. Comparing the screen size, there is a negligible difference in screen size between the "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" and the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB". As a result, the app buttons on both are equally easy to press. We recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB | 74/100 | 5.0inch |
XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB | 69/100 | 4.7inch |
"Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" and "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB", which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" is 720 x 1280, and pixel density is 293ppi. Also, the resolution on the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" is 540 x 960, and pixel density is 234ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" has much higher pixel density than the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB", with a difference of roughly 59ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" is superior to the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" over the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB".
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB | 59/100 | 293ppi |
XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB | 42/100 | 234ppi |
"Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" and "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
The "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" is 2000.0mAh, and the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" is 1800.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" has greater battery capacity than the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB", with a 200mAh difference. If battery is a priority, then the "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" is recommended over the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB".
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB | 50/100 | 2000.0mAh |
XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB | 44/100 | 1800.0mAh |
"Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" and "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB", which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
The "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB"'s CPU is a Mediatek MT6735P, with performance measured at 1.0GHz×4(4.0-cores). Also, the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm MSM8212 Snapdragon 200, with performance measured at 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, there is almost no difference in the specs of the "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" and the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB". For that reason the level of smoothness felt when using apps and comfortable handling of games is about the same. For that reason it is better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB | 11/100 | 1.0GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB | 14/100 | 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
"Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" and "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
The weight of the "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" is 1.0GB and the weight of the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" is 1.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, there is almost no difference in the amount of RAM of the "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" and the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB". For that reason they have about the same level of multitasking performance and 3D game and VR smoothness. That's why it is better to make a comparison in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB | 20/100 | 1.0GB |
XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB | 20/100 | 1.0GB |
"Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" and "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB", which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" is 16.0GB. Also the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" is 8.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB", with a roughly 8GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" is superior to the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" over the "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB".
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB | 50/100 | 16.0GB |
XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB | 24/100 | 8.0GB |
"Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" and "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" has a 8.0MP main camera. Also, "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" has a 8.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" and "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" have approximately the same pixel count. As a result, they can both take pictures and shoot videos of roughly the same quality. Therefore, we recommend comparing the two based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB | 50/100 | 8.0MP |
XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB | 50/100 | 8.0MP |
"Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" and "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" has an 2.0MP front camera and "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" has an 2.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" and "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB" have approximately the same pixel count. As a result, they can both take pictures and shoot videos of roughly the same quality. Therefore, we recommend comparing the two based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB | 15/100 | 2.0MP |
XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB | 15/100 | 2.0MP |
"Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB" and "XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
Panasonic P77 (2016) 16GB | XOLO Q900s (2014) 8GB | |
Image | ||
Maker | Panasonic | XOLO |
Release date | 2016-09 | 2014-07 |
Color | White/Gray | Black/White |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 72.0mm x 143.0mm x 7.6mm | 67.2mm x 135.8mm x 7.2mm |
Weight | 126.0g | 100.0g |
Display size | 5.0inch | 4.7inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1280 | 540 x 960 |
Pixel density | 293ppi | 234ppi |
Battery capacity | 2000.0mAh | 1800.0mAh |
Chipset | Mediatek MT6735P | Qualcomm MSM8212 Snapdragon 200 |
CPU specs | 1.0GHz×4(4.0-cores) | 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 1.0GB | 1.0GB |
Storage size | 16.0GB | 8.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 8.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 2.0MP | 2.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |