Galaxy Fame Lite S6790 vs vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB: Specs & Scores
Created date: 2018-09-30 22:49:41, Updated date: 2020-04-16 16:53:06
Are you having trouble comparing the differences in features and performance of the "Galaxy Fame Lite S6790" and "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB", or unsure about their differences in ease-of-use, and wondering which to buy? We did a deep-dive comparison of the features, specs, and capabilities of these two smartphone, and provided our rating of which one was a better buy.
Galaxy Fame Lite S6790 | vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB | |||
General rating: | 31.2/100 (The 2962th of all smartphones) | 54.1/100 (The 1415th of all smartphones) | ||
Holding comfort | 79/100 | 67/100 | ||
Weight | 82/100 | 73/100 | ||
Screen size | 50/100 | 77/100 | ||
Display quality | 11/100 | 57/100 | ||
Battery life | 29/100 | 60/100 | ||
Processing power | 3/100 | 51/100 | ||
Memory capacity | - /100 | 60/100 | ||
Storage capacity | 11/100 | 50/100 | ||
Rear camera performance | 12/100 | 61/100 | ||
Front camera performance | - /100 | 50/100 | ||
Contents
- 1."Galaxy Fame Lite S6790" and "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB", performance comparison
- 1-0."Galaxy Fame Lite S6790" and "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2."Galaxy Fame Lite S6790" and "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3."Galaxy Fame Lite S6790" and "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4."Galaxy Fame Lite S6790" and "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5."Galaxy Fame Lite S6790" and "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB", which has a clearer display?
- 1-6."Galaxy Fame Lite S6790" and "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB", whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7."Galaxy Fame Lite S6790" and "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB", which has more data storage?
- 1-8."Galaxy Fame Lite S6790" and "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9."Galaxy Fame Lite S6790" and "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB", which has better CPU?
- 1-10."Galaxy Fame Lite S6790" and "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2."Galaxy Fame Lite S6790" and "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
"Galaxy Fame Lite S6790" and "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB", performance comparison
"Galaxy Fame Lite S6790" and "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The "Galaxy Fame Lite S6790" has a width of 61.6mm, a length of 113.2mm, and a thickness of 11.9mm. Also, the "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB" has a width of 72.9mm, a length of 147.9mm, and a thickness of 7.5mm.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Galaxy Fame Lite S6790" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB". The "Galaxy Fame Lite S6790" excels over the "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "Galaxy Fame Lite S6790" over the "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB".
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Galaxy Fame Lite S6790" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB". The "Galaxy Fame Lite S6790" excels over the "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "Galaxy Fame Lite S6790" over the "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB".
Comparing the overall size of the two devices, the "Galaxy Fame Lite S6790" is a considerably larger size than the "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB". In terms of being more convenient to use one-handed, and less likely to get in the way when you're not using it, the "Galaxy Fame Lite S6790" is superior to the "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB". If you're going for the smart phone sized to be easiest to carry and handle with one hand, we recommend buying the "Galaxy Fame Lite S6790" over the "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB".
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy Fame Lite S6790 | 79/100 | 61.6mm x 113.2mm x 11.9mm |
vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB | 67/100 | 72.9mm x 147.9mm x 7.5mm |
"Galaxy Fame Lite S6790" and "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
The weight of the "Galaxy Fame Lite S6790" is about 118.2g, and the weight of the "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB" is about 142.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "Galaxy Fame Lite S6790" is a lighter smart phone than the "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB", with a difference of about 23.7g. For that reason the "Galaxy Fame Lite S6790" is a smart phone that is less likely than the "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB"to put a burden on your fingers and wrist when used for an extended period. That's why we recommend the "Galaxy Fame Lite S6790" over the "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB".
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy Fame Lite S6790 | 82/100 | 118.2g |
vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB | 73/100 | 142.0g |
"Galaxy Fame Lite S6790" and "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB", whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The "Galaxy Fame Lite S6790" has a 3.5inch display. Also, the "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB" has a 5.2inch display. Comparing the screen size, the "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB" has a considerably larger screen than the "Galaxy Fame Lite S6790", with a difference of approximately 1.7inch. The "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB" is superior to the "Galaxy Fame Lite S6790" in terms of its larger buttons and the intensity of the user's experience when playing games and watching videos. In addition, the larger screen on the "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB" has the benefit of being easier on the user's eyes. If you are looking for a smartphone that you are less likely to mistap, offers a more intense viewing and gaming experience, and decreases eyestrain, then we recommend the "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB" over the "Galaxy Fame Lite S6790".
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy Fame Lite S6790 | 50/100 | 3.5inch |
vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB | 77/100 | 5.2inch |
"Galaxy Fame Lite S6790" and "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB", which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the "Galaxy Fame Lite S6790" is 320 x 480, and pixel density is 164ppi. Also, the resolution on the "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB" is 720 x 1280, and pixel density is 282ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB" has much higher pixel density than the "Galaxy Fame Lite S6790", with a difference of roughly 118ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB" is superior to the "Galaxy Fame Lite S6790". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB" over the "Galaxy Fame Lite S6790".
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy Fame Lite S6790 | 11/100 | 164ppi |
vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB | 57/100 | 282ppi |
"Galaxy Fame Lite S6790" and "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
The "Galaxy Fame Lite S6790" is 1300.0mAh, and the "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB" is 2730.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB" has greater battery capacity than the "Galaxy Fame Lite S6790", with a 1430mAh difference. Since the "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB" can be used for longer periods without recharging than the "Galaxy Fame Lite S6790", it is great for outdoor use. If you want a smartphone with a longer battery life, we recommend the "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB" over the "Galaxy Fame Lite S6790".
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy Fame Lite S6790 | 29/100 | 1300.0mAh |
vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB | 60/100 | 2730.0mAh |
Want to read it together
"Galaxy Fame Lite S6790" and "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB", which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
Also, the "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm MSM8917 Snapdragon 425, with performance measured at 1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB" has considerably higher specs than the "Galaxy Fame Lite S6790". In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB" is superior to the "Galaxy Fame Lite S6790". If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB" over the "Galaxy Fame Lite S6790".
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy Fame Lite S6790 | 3/100 | 0.830078125GHz×1(1.0-cores) |
vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB | 51/100 | 1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
"Galaxy Fame Lite S6790" and "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy Fame Lite S6790 | - /100 | |
vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB | 60/100 | 3.0GB |
"Galaxy Fame Lite S6790" and "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB", which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the "Galaxy Fame Lite S6790" is 4.0GB. Also the "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB" is 16.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "Galaxy Fame Lite S6790", with a roughly 12GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB" is superior to the "Galaxy Fame Lite S6790". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB" over the "Galaxy Fame Lite S6790".
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy Fame Lite S6790 | 11/100 | 4.0GB |
vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB | 50/100 | 16.0GB |
"Galaxy Fame Lite S6790" and "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Galaxy Fame Lite S6790" has a 3.0MP main camera. Also, "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Galaxy Fame Lite S6790", with a roughly 10MP difference. In terms of taking or shooting high resolution pictures or videos that will look clean when printed, the "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB" is superior to the "Galaxy Fame Lite S6790". If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting videos and taking pictures, we recommend the "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB" over the "Galaxy Fame Lite S6790".
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy Fame Lite S6790 | 12/100 | 3.0MP |
vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB | 61/100 | 13.0MP |
"Galaxy Fame Lite S6790" and "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy Fame Lite S6790 | - /100 | |
vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB | 50/100 | 5.0MP |
"Galaxy Fame Lite S6790" and "vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
Galaxy Fame Lite S6790 | vivo Y55s (2017) 16GB | |
Image | ||
Maker | Samsung | vivo |
Release date | 2013-10 | 2017-02 |
Color | Pearl White/Midnight Black | Crown Gold/Rose Gold/Space Gray |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 61.6mm x 113.2mm x 11.9mm | 72.9mm x 147.9mm x 7.5mm |
Weight | 118.2g | 142.0g |
Display size | 3.5inch | 5.2inch |
Display type | TFT | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 320 x 480 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 164ppi | 282ppi |
Battery capacity | 1300.0mAh | 2730.0mAh |
CPU specs | 0.830078125GHz×1(1.0-cores) | 1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
Storage size | 4.0GB | 16.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 3.0MP | 13.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |