Which is better, vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB or LG X style (2016) 16GB? We compared their features and specs in detail
Created date: 2018-09-30 22:16:17, Updated date: 2021-10-20 13:53:56
How did the evaluations between the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "LG X style (2016) 16GB" differ when we compared the two? We reviewed each of the most commonly scrutinized features. If you are thinking about which smartphone to get, check out this review immediately!
vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB | LG X style (2016) 16GB | |||
General rating: | 56.2/100 (The 2245th of all smartphones) | 48.1/100 (The 1563th of all smartphones) | ||
Holding comfort | 65/100 | 71/100 | ||
Weight | 71/100 | 81/100 | ||
Screen size | 77/100 | 74/100 | ||
Display quality | 85/100 | 59/100 | ||
Battery life | 59/100 | 51/100 | ||
Processing power | 64/100 | 23/100 | ||
Memory capacity | 60/100 | 35/100 | ||
Storage capacity | 55/100 | 50/100 | ||
Rear camera performance | 61/100 | 50/100 | ||
Front camera performance | 58/100 | 50/100 | ||
Contents
- 1."vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "LG X style (2016) 16GB", performance comparison
- 1-0."vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "LG X style (2016) 16GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2."vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "LG X style (2016) 16GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3."vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "LG X style (2016) 16GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4."vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "LG X style (2016) 16GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5."vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "LG X style (2016) 16GB", which has a clearer display?
- 1-6."vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "LG X style (2016) 16GB", whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7."vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "LG X style (2016) 16GB", which has more data storage?
- 1-8."vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "LG X style (2016) 16GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9."vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "LG X style (2016) 16GB", which has better CPU?
- 1-10."vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "LG X style (2016) 16GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2."vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "LG X style (2016) 16GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
"vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "LG X style (2016) 16GB", performance comparison
"vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "LG X style (2016) 16GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" has a width of 73.3mm, a length of 146.5mm, and a thickness of 8.0mm. Also, the "LG X style (2016) 16GB" has a width of 71.4mm, a length of 144.8mm, and a thickness of 6.9mm.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "LG X style (2016) 16GB" is smaller and more compact compared to the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB". For that reason, the "LG X style (2016) 16GB" is easier to grip firmly and carry one-handed than the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB". For that reason, we recommend the "LG X style (2016) 16GB".
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and the "LG X style (2016) 16GB". For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Comparing the overall size of the two devices, there isn't a big difference in size between the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and the "LG X style (2016) 16GB". For that reason the ease of carrying and use with one hand is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB | 65/100 | 73.3mm x 146.5mm x 8.0mm |
LG X style (2016) 16GB | 71/100 | 71.4mm x 144.8mm x 6.9mm |
"vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "LG X style (2016) 16GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
The weight of the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" is about 148.0g, and the weight of the "LG X style (2016) 16GB" is about 121.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "LG X style (2016) 16GB" is a considerably lighter smart phone than the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB", and there is a difference of about 27g. In terms of the burden placed upon your fingers and wrist, the "LG X style (2016) 16GB" is superior to the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB". If you are going for a smart phone that won't lead to hand fatigue even after extended use, and is less likely to place a burden on your fingers, we recommend purchasing the "LG X style (2016) 16GB" over the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB".
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB | 71/100 | 148.0g |
LG X style (2016) 16GB | 81/100 | 121.0g |
"vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "LG X style (2016) 16GB", whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" has a 5.2inch display. Also, the "LG X style (2016) 16GB" has a 5.0inch display. Comparing the screen size, there is a negligible difference in screen size between the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and the "LG X style (2016) 16GB". As a result, the app buttons on both are equally easy to press. We recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB | 77/100 | 5.2inch |
LG X style (2016) 16GB | 74/100 | 5.0inch |
"vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "LG X style (2016) 16GB", which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" is 1080 x 1920, and pixel density is 423ppi. Also, the resolution on the "LG X style (2016) 16GB" is 720 x 1280, and pixel density is 293ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" has much higher pixel density than the "LG X style (2016) 16GB", with a difference of roughly 130ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" is superior to the "LG X style (2016) 16GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" over the "LG X style (2016) 16GB".
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB | 85/100 | 423ppi |
LG X style (2016) 16GB | 59/100 | 293ppi |
"vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "LG X style (2016) 16GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
The "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" is 2600.0mAh, and the "LG X style (2016) 16GB" is 2100.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" has greater battery capacity than the "LG X style (2016) 16GB", with a 500mAh difference. If battery is a priority, then the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" is recommended over the "LG X style (2016) 16GB".
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB | 59/100 | 2600.0mAh |
LG X style (2016) 16GB | 51/100 | 2100.0mAh |
Want to read it together
"vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "LG X style (2016) 16GB", which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
The "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm MSM8974AA Snapdragon 801, with performance measured at 2.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). Also, the "LG X style (2016) 16GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm MSM8909 Snapdragon 210, with performance measured at 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" has considerably higher specs than the "LG X style (2016) 16GB". In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" is superior to the "LG X style (2016) 16GB". If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" over the "LG X style (2016) 16GB".
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB | 64/100 | 2.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
LG X style (2016) 16GB | 23/100 | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
"vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "LG X style (2016) 16GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
The weight of the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" is 3.0GB and the weight of the "LG X style (2016) 16GB" is 1.5GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "LG X style (2016) 16GB", with a difference of about 1.5GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" is superior to the "LG X style (2016) 16GB". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" over the "LG X style (2016) 16GB".
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB | 60/100 | 3.0GB |
LG X style (2016) 16GB | 35/100 | 1.5GB |
"vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "LG X style (2016) 16GB", which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" is 32.0GB. Also the "LG X style (2016) 16GB" is 16.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" has a greater storage capacity compared to the "LG X style (2016) 16GB", with a roughly 16GB difference. As a result, the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" can take more pictures and videos, and have more applications installed, than the "LG X style (2016) 16GB". Therefore, we recommend the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB".
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB | 55/100 | 32.0GB |
LG X style (2016) 16GB | 50/100 | 16.0GB |
"vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "LG X style (2016) 16GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Also, "LG X style (2016) 16GB" has a 8.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "LG X style (2016) 16GB", with a roughly 5MP difference. In terms of taking or shooting high resolution pictures or videos that will look clean when printed, the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" is superior to the "LG X style (2016) 16GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting videos and taking pictures, we recommend the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" over the "LG X style (2016) 16GB".
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB | 61/100 | 13.0MP |
LG X style (2016) 16GB | 50/100 | 8.0MP |
"vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "LG X style (2016) 16GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" has an 8.0MP front camera and "LG X style (2016) 16GB" has an 5.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" has a higher pixel count than the "LG X style (2016) 16GB", with a roughly 3MP difference. As a result, the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" is better able to take high quality selfies than the "LG X style (2016) 16GB", and the pictures will look cleaner when printed. Therefore, we recommend the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB".
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB | 58/100 | 8.0MP |
LG X style (2016) 16GB | 50/100 | 5.0MP |
"vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "LG X style (2016) 16GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB | LG X style (2016) 16GB | |
Image | ||
Maker | vivo | LG |
Color | White+Black | Black/White/Titan |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 73.3mm x 146.5mm x 8.0mm | 71.4mm x 144.8mm x 6.9mm |
Weight | 148.0g | 121.0g |
Display size | 5.2inch | 5.0inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 1920 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 423ppi | 293ppi |
Battery capacity | 2600.0mAh | 2100.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8974AA Snapdragon 801 | Qualcomm MSM8909 Snapdragon 210 |
CPU specs | 2.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 3.0GB | 1.5GB |
Storage size | 32.0GB | 16.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 8.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 5.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |