Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Should you buy vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB or Wiko WIM Lite? Compare the differences in functions and specifications/performances thoroughly

Created date: 2018-09-30 23:07:49, Updated date: 2020-04-16 21:12:07

vivo Xshot (2014) 32GBWiko WIM Lite
vivo Xshot (2014) 32GBWiko WIM Lite

Are you having trouble comparing the differences in features and performance of the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "Wiko WIM Lite", or unsure about their differences in ease-of-use, and wondering which to buy? We did a deep-dive comparison of the features, specs, and capabilities of these two smartphone, and provided our rating of which one was a better buy.

vivo Xshot (2014) 32GBWiko WIM Lite
vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB

Wiko WIM Lite
General rating:
Holding comfortrating-image3.3
73.3mm x 146.5mm x 8.0mm
rating-image3.4
71.7mm x 144.0mm x 8.8mm
Weightrating-image3.6
148.0g
rating-image3.5
149.0g
Screen sizerating-image3.9
5.2inch
rating-image3.7
5.0inch
Display qualityrating-image4.3
423ppi
rating-image4.3
440ppi
Battery liferating-image3.0
2600.0mAh
rating-image3.3
3000.0mAh
Processing powerrating-image3.2
2.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)
rating-image3.6
1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores)
Memory capacityrating-image3.0
3.0GB
rating-image3.0
3.0GB
Storage capacityrating-image2.8
32.0GB
rating-image2.8
32.0GB
Rear camera performancerating-image3.1
13.0MP
rating-image3.1
13.0MP
Front camera performancerating-image2.9
8.0MP
rating-image3.8
16.0MP

"vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "Wiko WIM Lite", performance comparison

"vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "Wiko WIM Lite" size comparison. Which to choose?

The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.

The "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" has a width of 73.3mm, a length of 146.5mm, and a thickness of 8.0mm. Also, the "Wiko WIM Lite" has a width of 71.7mm, a length of 144.0mm, and a thickness of 8.8mm.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't much difference between the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "Wiko WIM Lite" in terms of size. For that reason, the ease of gripping and carrying the devices in one hand is about the same for both. Therefore it's better to compare them in terms of performance and functionality.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and the "Wiko WIM Lite". For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

Comparing the overall size of the two devices, there isn't a big difference in size between the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and the "Wiko WIM Lite". For that reason the ease of carrying and use with one hand is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreDimensions (width x height x thickness)
vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB65/10073.3mm x 146.5mm x 8.0mm
Wiko WIM Lite67/10071.7mm x 144.0mm x 8.8mm

"vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "Wiko WIM Lite", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison

The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.

The weight of the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" is about 148.0g, and the weight of the "Wiko WIM Lite" is about 149.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, there isn't much difference in weight between the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "Wiko WIM Lite". That's why the likelihood of fatigue in the fingers and wrists after extended use is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreWeight
vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB71/100148.0g
Wiko WIM Lite70/100149.0g

"vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "Wiko WIM Lite", whose display is easier to use?

The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.

The "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" has a 5.2inch display. Also, the "Wiko WIM Lite" has a 5.0inch display. Comparing the screen size, there is a negligible difference in screen size between the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and the "Wiko WIM Lite". As a result, the app buttons on both are equally easy to press. We recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreDisplay size
vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB77/1005.2inch
Wiko WIM Lite74/1005.0inch

"vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "Wiko WIM Lite", which has a clearer display?

Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.

The resolution on the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" is 1080 x 1920, and pixel density is 423ppi. Also, the resolution on the "Wiko WIM Lite" is 1080 x 1920, and pixel density is 440ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the difference in pixel density between the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and the "Wiko WIM Lite" is negligible. As a result, they are both evenly matched in terms of picture quality and easiness on the eyes. Therefore, we recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScorePixel density
vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB85/100423ppi
Wiko WIM Lite85/100440ppi

"vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "Wiko WIM Lite", a summary of the differences in battery life

Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.

The "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" is 2600.0mAh, and the "Wiko WIM Lite" is 3000.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "Wiko WIM Lite" has greater battery capacity than the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB", with a 400mAh difference. If battery is a priority, then the "Wiko WIM Lite" is recommended over the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB".

ScoreBattery capacity
vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB59/1002600.0mAh
Wiko WIM Lite65/1003000.0mAh

"vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "Wiko WIM Lite", which has better CPU?

CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.

The "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm MSM8974AA Snapdragon 801, with performance measured at 2.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). Also, the "Wiko WIM Lite"'s CPU is a Qualcomm MSM8940 Snapdragon 435, with performance measured at 1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "Wiko WIM Lite" has higher specs compared to the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB". For that reason, the "Wiko WIM Lite" allows for more comfortable use of apps, and games that run more smoothly. That's why we recommend the "Wiko WIM Lite" over the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB".

ScoreCPU specs
vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB64/1002.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)
Wiko WIM Lite71/1001.4GHz×8(8.0-cores)

"vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "Wiko WIM Lite", what's the difference in memory capacity?

RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.

The weight of the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" is 3.0GB and the weight of the "Wiko WIM Lite" is 3.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, there is almost no difference in the amount of RAM of the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and the "Wiko WIM Lite". For that reason they have about the same level of multitasking performance and 3D game and VR smoothness. That's why it is better to make a comparison in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreRAM size
vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB60/1003.0GB
Wiko WIM Lite60/1003.0GB

"vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "Wiko WIM Lite", which has more data storage?

Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.

The data storage capacity of the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" is 32.0GB. Also the "Wiko WIM Lite" is 32.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, there is a negligible difference in storage capacity between the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "Wiko WIM Lite". As a result, you can save roughly the same amount of pictures, and install roughly the same amount of applications, on either phone. You are better off comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreStorage size
vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB55/10032.0GB
Wiko WIM Lite55/10032.0GB

"vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "Wiko WIM Lite" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Also, "Wiko WIM Lite" has a 13.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "Wiko WIM Lite" have approximately the same pixel count. As a result, they can both take pictures and shoot videos of roughly the same quality. Therefore, we recommend comparing the two based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreRear-camera resolution
vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB61/10013.0MP
Wiko WIM Lite61/10013.0MP

"vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "Wiko WIM Lite", whose front camera has a better picture quality?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" has an 8.0MP front camera and "Wiko WIM Lite" has an 16.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "Wiko WIM Lite" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB", with a roughly 8MP difference. As a result, the "Wiko WIM Lite" is more suited than the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" for shooting videos and taking pictures. If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting high resolution selfies which will look clean when printed, we recommend the "Wiko WIM Lite" over the "vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB".

ScoreFront-camera resolution
vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB58/1008.0MP
Wiko WIM Lite75/10016.0MP

"vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB" and "Wiko WIM Lite", performance comparison by specification sheet

vivo Xshot (2014) 32GBWiko WIM Lite
Imagevivo Xshot (2014) 32GBWiko WIM Lite
MakervivoWiko
ColorWhite+Blackblack,gold,deep bleen,cherry red
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)73.3mm x 146.5mm x 8.0mm71.7mm x 144.0mm x 8.8mm
Weight148.0g149.0g
Display size5.2inch5.0inch
Display typeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)1080 x 19201080 x 1920
Pixel density423ppi440ppi
Battery capacity2600.0mAh3000.0mAh
ChipsetQualcomm MSM8974AA Snapdragon 801Qualcomm MSM8940 Snapdragon 435
CPU specs2.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores)
RAM size3.0GB3.0GB
Storage size32.0GB32.0GB
Rear-camera resolution13.0MP13.0MP
Front-camera resolution8.0MP16.0MP

Check price

Articles related to vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB
Articles related to Wiko WIM Lite

vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB

Articles related to vivo Xshot (2014) 32GB
Articles related to Wiko WIM Lite

Wiko WIM Lite

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Wiko WIM Lite

New articles