Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Wiko Highway (2014) 32GB vs. Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB Specs & Scores

Created date: 2018-09-30 22:42:51, Updated date: 2021-10-20 16:51:34

Wiko Highway (2014) 32GBPanasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB
Wiko Highway (2014) 32GBPanasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB

Are you having trouble comparing the differences in features and performance of the "Wiko Highway (2014) 32GB" and "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB", or unsure about their differences in ease-of-use, and wondering which to buy? We did a deep-dive comparison of the features, specs, and capabilities of these two smartphone, and provided our rating of which one was a better buy.

Wiko Highway (2014) 32GBPanasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB
Wiko Highway (2014) 32GB

Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB

General rating:
Holding comfortrating-image3.6
72/100
rating-image3.6
71/100
Weightrating-image3.4
68/100
rating-image3.6
72/100
Screen sizerating-image3.7
74/100
rating-image3.7
74/100
Display qualityrating-image4.3
85/100
rating-image3.0
59/100
Battery liferating-image2.8
55/100
rating-image2.8
55/100
Processing powerrating-image3.6
72/100
rating-image3.7
74/100
Memory capacityrating-image2.5
50/100
rating-image3.0
60/100
Storage capacityrating-image2.8
55/100
rating-image2.8
55/100
Rear camera performancerating-image3.4
68/100
rating-image3.1
61/100
Front camera performancerating-image2.9
58/100
rating-image2.5
50/100

"Wiko Highway (2014) 32GB" and "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB", performance comparison

"Wiko Highway (2014) 32GB" and "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB" size comparison. Which to choose?

The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.

The "Wiko Highway (2014) 32GB" has a width of 70.0mm, a length of 144.0mm, and a thickness of 7.7mm. Also, the "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB" has a width of 71.2mm, a length of 142.4mm, and a thickness of 6.9mm.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't much difference between the "Wiko Highway (2014) 32GB" and "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB" in terms of size. For that reason, the ease of gripping and carrying the devices in one hand is about the same for both. Therefore it's better to compare them in terms of performance and functionality.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the "Wiko Highway (2014) 32GB" and the "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB". For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

Comparing the overall size of the two devices, there isn't a big difference in size between the "Wiko Highway (2014) 32GB" and the "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB". For that reason the ease of carrying and use with one hand is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreDimensions (width x height x thickness)
Wiko Highway (2014) 32GB72/10070.0mm x 144.0mm x 7.7mm
Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB71/10071.2mm x 142.4mm x 6.9mm

"Wiko Highway (2014) 32GB" and "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison

The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.

The weight of the "Wiko Highway (2014) 32GB" is about 154.0g, and the weight of the "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB" is about 145.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, there isn't much difference in weight between the "Wiko Highway (2014) 32GB" and "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB". That's why the likelihood of fatigue in the fingers and wrists after extended use is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreWeight
Wiko Highway (2014) 32GB68/100154.0g
Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB72/100145.0g

"Wiko Highway (2014) 32GB" and "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB", whose display is easier to use?

The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.

The "Wiko Highway (2014) 32GB" has a 5.0inch display. Also, the "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB" has a 5.0inch display. Comparing the screen size, there is a negligible difference in screen size between the "Wiko Highway (2014) 32GB" and the "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB". As a result, the app buttons on both are equally easy to press. We recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreDisplay size
Wiko Highway (2014) 32GB74/1005.0inch
Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB74/1005.0inch

"Wiko Highway (2014) 32GB" and "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB", which has a clearer display?

Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.

The resolution on the "Wiko Highway (2014) 32GB" is 1080 x 1920, and pixel density is 440ppi. Also, the resolution on the "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB" is 720 x 1280, and pixel density is 293ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "Wiko Highway (2014) 32GB" has much higher pixel density than the "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB", with a difference of roughly 147ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "Wiko Highway (2014) 32GB" is superior to the "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "Wiko Highway (2014) 32GB" over the "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB".

ScorePixel density
Wiko Highway (2014) 32GB85/100440ppi
Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB59/100293ppi

"Wiko Highway (2014) 32GB" and "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB", a summary of the differences in battery life

Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.

The "Wiko Highway (2014) 32GB" is 2350.0mAh, and the "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB" is 2350.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, there is a negligible difference in battery capacity between the "Wiko Highway (2014) 32GB" and "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB". Since both have roughly equal battery life, you are better off comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreBattery capacity
Wiko Highway (2014) 32GB55/1002350.0mAh
Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB55/1002350.0mAh

"Wiko Highway (2014) 32GB" and "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB", which has better CPU?

CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.

The "Wiko Highway (2014) 32GB"'s CPU is a Mediatek MT6592, with performance measured at 2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). Also, the "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB"'s CPU is a Mediatek MT6753, with performance measured at 1.5GHz×8(8.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, there is almost no difference in the specs of the "Wiko Highway (2014) 32GB" and the "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB". For that reason the level of smoothness felt when using apps and comfortable handling of games is about the same. For that reason it is better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreCPU specs
Wiko Highway (2014) 32GB72/1002.0GHz×8(8.0-cores)
Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB74/1001.5GHz×8(8.0-cores)

"Wiko Highway (2014) 32GB" and "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?

RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.

The weight of the "Wiko Highway (2014) 32GB" is 2.0GB and the weight of the "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB" is 3.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "Wiko Highway (2014) 32GB", with a difference of about 1GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB" is superior to the "Wiko Highway (2014) 32GB". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB" over the "Wiko Highway (2014) 32GB".

ScoreRAM size
Wiko Highway (2014) 32GB50/1002.0GB
Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB60/1003.0GB

"Wiko Highway (2014) 32GB" and "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB", which has more data storage?

Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.

The data storage capacity of the "Wiko Highway (2014) 32GB" is 32.0GB. Also the "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB" is 32.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, there is a negligible difference in storage capacity between the "Wiko Highway (2014) 32GB" and "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB". As a result, you can save roughly the same amount of pictures, and install roughly the same amount of applications, on either phone. You are better off comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreStorage size
Wiko Highway (2014) 32GB55/10032.0GB
Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB55/10032.0GB

"Wiko Highway (2014) 32GB" and "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"Wiko Highway (2014) 32GB" has a 16.0MP main camera. Also, "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Wiko Highway (2014) 32GB" has a higher pixel count than the "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB", with a roughly 3MP difference. As a result, the "Wiko Highway (2014) 32GB" is better able to take high quality landscape pictures than the "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB", and the pictures will look cleaner when printed. Therefore, we recommend the "Wiko Highway (2014) 32GB".

ScoreRear-camera resolution
Wiko Highway (2014) 32GB68/10016.0MP
Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB61/10013.0MP

"Wiko Highway (2014) 32GB" and "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"Wiko Highway (2014) 32GB" has an 8.0MP front camera and "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB" has an 5.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "Wiko Highway (2014) 32GB" has a higher pixel count than the "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB", with a roughly 3MP difference. As a result, the "Wiko Highway (2014) 32GB" is better able to take high quality selfies than the "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB", and the pictures will look cleaner when printed. Therefore, we recommend the "Wiko Highway (2014) 32GB".

ScoreFront-camera resolution
Wiko Highway (2014) 32GB58/1008.0MP
Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB50/1005.0MP

"Wiko Highway (2014) 32GB" and "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB", performance comparison by specification sheet

Wiko Highway (2014) 32GBPanasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB
ImageWiko Highway (2014) 32GBPanasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB
MakerWikoPanasonic
Release date2014-022016-01
ColorBlack/White/Blue Electric/Orange/PurpleMarine Blue/Champagne Gold/Rose Gold
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)70.0mm x 144.0mm x 7.7mm71.2mm x 142.4mm x 6.9mm
Weight154.0g145.0g
Display size5.0inch5.0inch
Display typeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)1080 x 1920720 x 1280
Pixel density440ppi293ppi
Battery capacity2350.0mAh2350.0mAh
ChipsetMediatek MT6592Mediatek MT6753
CPU specs2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores)1.5GHz×8(8.0-cores)
RAM size2.0GB3.0GB
Storage size32.0GB32.0GB
Rear-camera resolution16.0MP13.0MP
Front-camera resolution8.0MP5.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

Articles related to Wiko Highway (2014) 32GB
Articles related to Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB

Wiko Highway (2014) 32GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Wiko Highway (2014) 32GB

Articles related to Wiko Highway (2014) 32GB
Articles related to Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB

Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB

New articles