Should you buy Yezz Andy 4.5M or OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB? Compare the differences in functions and specifications/performances thoroughly
Created date: 2018-09-30 21:44:46, Updated date: 2020-04-16 17:11:18
Are you having trouble comparing the differences in features and performance of the "Yezz Andy 4.5M" and "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB", or unsure about their differences in ease-of-use, and wondering which to buy? We did a deep-dive comparison of the features, specs, and capabilities of these two smartphone, and provided our rating of which one was a better buy.
Yezz Andy 4.5M | OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB | |||
General rating: | 43.1/100 (The 2592th of all smartphones) | 66.9/100 (The 1117th of all smartphones) | ||
Holding comfort | 74/100 | 64/100 | ||
Weight | 73/100 | 67/100 | ||
Screen size | 66/100 | 82/100 | ||
Display quality | 35/100 | 85/100 | ||
Battery life | 35/100 | 65/100 | ||
Processing power | 16/100 | 65/100 | ||
Memory capacity | 20/100 | 90/100 | ||
Storage capacity | 11/100 | 67/100 | ||
Rear camera performance | 61/100 | 68/100 | ||
Front camera performance | 7/100 | 58/100 |
Contents
- 1."Yezz Andy 4.5M" and "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB", performance comparison
- 1-0."Yezz Andy 4.5M" and "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2."Yezz Andy 4.5M" and "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3."Yezz Andy 4.5M" and "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4."Yezz Andy 4.5M" and "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5."Yezz Andy 4.5M" and "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB", which has a clearer display?
- 1-6."Yezz Andy 4.5M" and "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB", whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7."Yezz Andy 4.5M" and "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB", which has more data storage?
- 1-8."Yezz Andy 4.5M" and "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9."Yezz Andy 4.5M" and "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB", which has better CPU?
- 1-10."Yezz Andy 4.5M" and "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2."Yezz Andy 4.5M" and "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
"Yezz Andy 4.5M" and "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB", performance comparison
"Yezz Andy 4.5M" and "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The "Yezz Andy 4.5M" has a width of 67.2mm, a length of 133.4mm, and a thickness of 9.2mm. Also, the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" has a width of 74.7mm, a length of 152.7mm, and a thickness of 7.4mm.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Yezz Andy 4.5M" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB". The "Yezz Andy 4.5M" excels over the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "Yezz Andy 4.5M" over the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB".
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Yezz Andy 4.5M" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB". The "Yezz Andy 4.5M" excels over the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "Yezz Andy 4.5M" over the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB".
Comparing the overall size of the two devices, the "Yezz Andy 4.5M" is a considerably larger size than the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB". In terms of being more convenient to use one-handed, and less likely to get in the way when you're not using it, the "Yezz Andy 4.5M" is superior to the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB". If you're going for the smart phone sized to be easiest to carry and handle with one hand, we recommend buying the "Yezz Andy 4.5M" over the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB".
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
Yezz Andy 4.5M | 74/100 | 67.2mm x 133.4mm x 9.2mm |
OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB | 64/100 | 74.7mm x 152.7mm x 7.4mm |
"Yezz Andy 4.5M" and "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
The weight of the "Yezz Andy 4.5M" is about 142.0g, and the weight of the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" is about 158.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "Yezz Andy 4.5M" is a lighter smart phone than the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB", with a difference of about 16g. For that reason the "Yezz Andy 4.5M" is a smart phone that is less likely than the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB"to put a burden on your fingers and wrist when used for an extended period. That's why we recommend the "Yezz Andy 4.5M" over the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB".
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
Yezz Andy 4.5M | 73/100 | 142.0g |
OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB | 67/100 | 158.0g |
"Yezz Andy 4.5M" and "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB", whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The "Yezz Andy 4.5M" has a 4.5inch display. Also, the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" has a 5.5inch display. Comparing the screen size, the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" has a considerably larger screen than the "Yezz Andy 4.5M", with a difference of approximately 1inch. The "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" is superior to the "Yezz Andy 4.5M" in terms of its larger buttons and the intensity of the user's experience when playing games and watching videos. In addition, the larger screen on the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" has the benefit of being easier on the user's eyes. If you are looking for a smartphone that you are less likely to mistap, offers a more intense viewing and gaming experience, and decreases eyestrain, then we recommend the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" over the "Yezz Andy 4.5M".
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
Yezz Andy 4.5M | 66/100 | 4.5inch |
OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB | 82/100 | 5.5inch |
"Yezz Andy 4.5M" and "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB", which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the "Yezz Andy 4.5M" is 480 x 854, and pixel density is 217ppi. Also, the resolution on the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" is 1080 x 1920, and pixel density is 400ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" has much higher pixel density than the "Yezz Andy 4.5M", with a difference of roughly 183ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" is superior to the "Yezz Andy 4.5M". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" over the "Yezz Andy 4.5M".
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
Yezz Andy 4.5M | 35/100 | 217ppi |
OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB | 85/100 | 400ppi |
"Yezz Andy 4.5M" and "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
The "Yezz Andy 4.5M" is 1500.0mAh, and the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" is 3000.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" has greater battery capacity than the "Yezz Andy 4.5M", with a 1500mAh difference. Since the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" can be used for longer periods without recharging than the "Yezz Andy 4.5M", it is great for outdoor use. If you want a smartphone with a longer battery life, we recommend the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" over the "Yezz Andy 4.5M".
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
Yezz Andy 4.5M | 35/100 | 1500.0mAh |
OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB | 65/100 | 3000.0mAh |
Want to read it together
"Yezz Andy 4.5M" and "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB", which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
The "Yezz Andy 4.5M"'s CPU is a Mediatek MT6582M, with performance measured at 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). Also, the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 820, with performance measured at 2.15GHz+1.6GHz×4(4.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" has considerably higher specs than the "Yezz Andy 4.5M". In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" is superior to the "Yezz Andy 4.5M". If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" over the "Yezz Andy 4.5M".
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
Yezz Andy 4.5M | 16/100 | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB | 65/100 | 2.15GHz+1.6GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
Want to read it together
"Yezz Andy 4.5M" and "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
The weight of the "Yezz Andy 4.5M" is 1.0GB and the weight of the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" is 6.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "Yezz Andy 4.5M", with a difference of about 5GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" is superior to the "Yezz Andy 4.5M". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" over the "Yezz Andy 4.5M".
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
Yezz Andy 4.5M | 20/100 | 1.0GB |
OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB | 90/100 | 6.0GB |
"Yezz Andy 4.5M" and "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB", which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the "Yezz Andy 4.5M" is 4.0GB. Also the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" is 64.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "Yezz Andy 4.5M", with a roughly 60GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" is superior to the "Yezz Andy 4.5M". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" over the "Yezz Andy 4.5M".
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
Yezz Andy 4.5M | 11/100 | 4.0GB |
OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB | 67/100 | 64.0GB |
Want to read it together
"Yezz Andy 4.5M" and "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Yezz Andy 4.5M" has a 13.0MP main camera. Also, "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" has a 16.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" has a higher pixel count than the "Yezz Andy 4.5M", with a roughly 3MP difference. As a result, the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" is better able to take high quality landscape pictures than the "Yezz Andy 4.5M", and the pictures will look cleaner when printed. Therefore, we recommend the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB".
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Yezz Andy 4.5M | 61/100 | 13.0MP |
OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB | 68/100 | 16.0MP |
"Yezz Andy 4.5M" and "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Yezz Andy 4.5M" has an 1.3MP front camera and "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" has an 8.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Yezz Andy 4.5M", with a roughly 6.7MP difference. As a result, the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" is more suited than the "Yezz Andy 4.5M" for shooting videos and taking pictures. If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting high resolution selfies which will look clean when printed, we recommend the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" over the "Yezz Andy 4.5M".
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Yezz Andy 4.5M | 7/100 | 1.3MP |
OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB | 58/100 | 8.0MP |
"Yezz Andy 4.5M" and "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
Yezz Andy 4.5M | OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB | |
Image | ||
Maker | Yezz | OnePlus |
Release date | 2014-08 | 2016-06 |
Color | black,blue,red | Graphite/soft gold |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 67.2mm x 133.4mm x 9.2mm | 74.7mm x 152.7mm x 7.4mm |
Weight | 142.0g | 158.0g |
Display size | 4.5inch | 5.5inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | Optic AMOLED |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 480 x 854 | 1080 x 1920 |
Pixel density | 217ppi | 400ppi |
Battery capacity | 1500.0mAh | 3000.0mAh |
Chipset | Mediatek MT6582M | Qualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 820 |
CPU specs | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) | 2.15GHz+1.6GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 1.0GB | 6.0GB |
Storage size | 4.0GB | 64.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 16.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 1.3MP | 8.0MP |