Should you buy Yezz Andy 3.5EH or Lava A32 (2016) 512MB? Compare the differences in functions and specifications/performances thoroughly
Created date: 2018-09-30 22:33:21, Updated date: 2022-06-02 17:26:09
How did the evaluations between the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" differ when we compared the two? We reviewed each of the most commonly scrutinized features. If you are thinking about which smartphone to get, check out this review immediately!
Yezz Andy 3.5EH | Lava A32 (2016) 512MB | |||
General rating: | 32.5/100 (The 2935th of all smartphones) | 37.7/100 (The 1793th of all smartphones) | ||
Holding comfort | 77/100 | 76/100 | ||
Weight | 84/100 | 93/100 | ||
Screen size | 50/100 | 58/100 | ||
Display quality | 11/100 | 42/100 | ||
Battery life | 29/100 | 35/100 | ||
Processing power | 4/100 | 0/100 | ||
Memory capacity | 0/100 | 0/100 | ||
Storage capacity | 0/100 | 0/100 | ||
Rear camera performance | 14/100 | 5/100 | ||
Front camera performance | 7/100 | - /100 |
Contents
- 1."Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB", performance comparison
- 1-0."Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2."Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3."Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4."Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5."Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB", which has a clearer display?
- 1-6."Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB", whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7."Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB", which has more data storage?
- 1-8."Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9."Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB", which has better CPU?
- 1-10."Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB", a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2."Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB", performance comparison by specification sheet
"Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB", performance comparison
"Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" has a width of 62.0mm, a length of 115.5mm, and a thickness of 12.5mm. Also, the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" has a width of 64.6mm, a length of 124.4mm, and a thickness of 10.8mm.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't much difference between the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" in terms of size. For that reason, the ease of gripping and carrying the devices in one hand is about the same for both. Therefore it's better to compare them in terms of performance and functionality.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" is a more compact size than the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB". For that reason the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" has higher one-handed operability, and has greater portability, being less likely to get in the way when being carried. For these reasons, we recommend the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH".
Comparing the overall size of the two devices, the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" has a large size compared to the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB". For that reason the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" is a size that is easier to use in one hand and comfortably carry than the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB". That's why we recommend the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH".
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
Yezz Andy 3.5EH | 77/100 | 62.0mm x 115.5mm x 12.5mm |
Lava A32 (2016) 512MB | 76/100 | 64.6mm x 124.4mm x 10.8mm |
"Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
The weight of the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" is about 115.0g, and the weight of the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" is about 92.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" is a lighter smart phone than the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH", with a difference of about 23g. For that reason the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" is a smart phone that is less likely than the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH"to put a burden on your fingers and wrist when used for an extended period. That's why we recommend the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" over the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH".
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
Yezz Andy 3.5EH | 84/100 | 115.0g |
Lava A32 (2016) 512MB | 93/100 | 92.0g |
"Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB", whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" has a 3.5inch display. Also, the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" has a 4.0inch display. Comparing the screen size, the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" has a larger screen compared to the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH", with a roughly 0.5inch difference. As a result, the user is less likely to mistap when using apps on the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" than on the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH", and is also able to enjoy videos and games on a larger screen. Therefore, we recommend the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB".
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
Yezz Andy 3.5EH | 50/100 | 3.5inch |
Lava A32 (2016) 512MB | 58/100 | 4.0inch |
"Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB", which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" is 320 x 480, and pixel density is 164ppi. Also, the resolution on the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" is 480 x 800, and pixel density is 233ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" has much higher pixel density than the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH", with a difference of roughly 69ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" is superior to the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" over the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH".
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
Yezz Andy 3.5EH | 11/100 | 164ppi |
Lava A32 (2016) 512MB | 42/100 | 233ppi |
"Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB", a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
The "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" is 1300.0mAh, and the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" is 1500.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" has greater battery capacity than the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH", with a 200mAh difference. If battery is a priority, then the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" is recommended over the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH".
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
Yezz Andy 3.5EH | 29/100 | 1300.0mAh |
Lava A32 (2016) 512MB | 35/100 | 1500.0mAh |
Want to read it together
"Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB", which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
The "Yezz Andy 3.5EH"'s CPU is a Mediatek MT6572M, with performance measured at 1.0GHz×2(2.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, there is almost no difference in the specs of the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB". For that reason the level of smoothness felt when using apps and comfortable handling of games is about the same. For that reason it is better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
Yezz Andy 3.5EH | 4/100 | 1.0GHz×2(2.0-cores) |
Lava A32 (2016) 512MB | 0/100 | 1.0GHz×1(1.0-cores) |
Want to read it together
"Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
The weight of the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" is 256.0MB and the weight of the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" is 256.0MB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, there is almost no difference in the amount of RAM of the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB". For that reason they have about the same level of multitasking performance and 3D game and VR smoothness. That's why it is better to make a comparison in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
Yezz Andy 3.5EH | 0/100 | 256.0MB |
Lava A32 (2016) 512MB | 0/100 | 256.0MB |
"Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB", which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" is 512.0MB. Also the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" is 512.0MB. Regarding storage capacity, there is a negligible difference in storage capacity between the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB". As a result, you can save roughly the same amount of pictures, and install roughly the same amount of applications, on either phone. You are better off comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
Yezz Andy 3.5EH | 0/100 | 512.0MB |
Lava A32 (2016) 512MB | 0/100 | 512.0MB |
Want to read it together
"Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Yezz Andy 3.5EH" has a 3.2MP main camera. Also, "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" has a 2.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" has a higher pixel count than the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB", with a roughly 1.2MP difference. As a result, the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH" is better able to take high quality landscape pictures than the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB", and the pictures will look cleaner when printed. Therefore, we recommend the "Yezz Andy 3.5EH".
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Yezz Andy 3.5EH | 14/100 | 3.2MP |
Lava A32 (2016) 512MB | 5/100 | 2.0MP |
"Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Yezz Andy 3.5EH | 7/100 | 1.3MP |
Lava A32 (2016) 512MB | - /100 |
"Yezz Andy 3.5EH" and "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB", performance comparison by specification sheet
Yezz Andy 3.5EH | Lava A32 (2016) 512MB | |
Image | ||
Maker | Yezz | Lava |
Release date | 2014-07 | 2016-07 |
Color | black,white,blue,green,fuschia | Black/White |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 62.0mm x 115.5mm x 12.5mm | 64.6mm x 124.4mm x 10.8mm |
Weight | 115.0g | 92.0g |
Display size | 3.5inch | 4.0inch |
Display type | LCD | TFT |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 320 x 480 | 480 x 800 |
Pixel density | 164ppi | 233ppi |
Battery capacity | 1300.0mAh | 1500.0mAh |
CPU specs | 1.0GHz×2(2.0-cores) | 1.0GHz×1(1.0-cores) |
RAM size | 256.0MB | 256.0MB |
Storage size | 512.0MB | 512.0MB |
Rear-camera resolution | 3.2MP | 2.0MP |