Compare ZTE Axon mini 32GB vs Intex Aqua Star L 8GB
Created date: 2018-09-30 21:40:34, Updated date: 2021-10-20 16:52:07
How did the evaluations between the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Intex Aqua Star L 8GB" differ when we compared the two? We reviewed each of the most commonly scrutinized features. If you are thinking about which smartphone to get, check out this review immediately!
ZTE Axon mini 32GB | Intex Aqua Star L 8GB | |||
General rating: | 56.7/100 (The 2231th of all smartphones) | 33.8/100 (The 1905th of all smartphones) | ||
Holding comfort | 71/100 | 66/100 | ||
Weight | 74/100 | 78/100 | ||
Screen size | 77/100 | 74/100 | ||
Display quality | 85/100 | 25/100 | ||
Battery life | 62/100 | 50/100 | ||
Processing power | 63/100 | 16/100 | ||
Memory capacity | 60/100 | 20/100 | ||
Storage capacity | 55/100 | 24/100 | ||
Rear camera performance | 61/100 | 50/100 | ||
Front camera performance | 58/100 | 15/100 | ||
Contents
- 1."ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Intex Aqua Star L 8GB", performance comparison
- 1-0."ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Intex Aqua Star L 8GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2."ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Intex Aqua Star L 8GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3."ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Intex Aqua Star L 8GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4."ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Intex Aqua Star L 8GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5."ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Intex Aqua Star L 8GB", which has a clearer display?
- 1-6."ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Intex Aqua Star L 8GB", whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7."ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Intex Aqua Star L 8GB", which has more data storage?
- 1-8."ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Intex Aqua Star L 8GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9."ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Intex Aqua Star L 8GB", which has better CPU?
- 1-10."ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Intex Aqua Star L 8GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2."ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Intex Aqua Star L 8GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
"ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Intex Aqua Star L 8GB", performance comparison
"ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Intex Aqua Star L 8GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" has a width of 70.0mm, a length of 143.5mm, and a thickness of 7.9mm. Also, the "Intex Aqua Star L 8GB" has a width of 72.9mm, a length of 141.0mm, and a thickness of 8.0mm.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" is smaller and more compact compared to the "Intex Aqua Star L 8GB". For that reason, the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" is easier to grip firmly and carry one-handed than the "Intex Aqua Star L 8GB". For that reason, we recommend the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB".
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and the "Intex Aqua Star L 8GB". For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Comparing the overall size of the two devices, there isn't a big difference in size between the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and the "Intex Aqua Star L 8GB". For that reason the ease of carrying and use with one hand is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
ZTE Axon mini 32GB | 71/100 | 70.0mm x 143.5mm x 7.9mm |
Intex Aqua Star L 8GB | 66/100 | 72.9mm x 141.0mm x 8.0mm |
"ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Intex Aqua Star L 8GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
The weight of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" is about 140.0g, and the weight of the "Intex Aqua Star L 8GB" is about 130.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, there isn't much difference in weight between the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Intex Aqua Star L 8GB". That's why the likelihood of fatigue in the fingers and wrists after extended use is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
ZTE Axon mini 32GB | 74/100 | 140.0g |
Intex Aqua Star L 8GB | 78/100 | 130.0g |
"ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Intex Aqua Star L 8GB", whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" has a 5.2inch display. Also, the "Intex Aqua Star L 8GB" has a 5.0inch display. Comparing the screen size, there is a negligible difference in screen size between the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and the "Intex Aqua Star L 8GB". As a result, the app buttons on both are equally easy to press. We recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
ZTE Axon mini 32GB | 77/100 | 5.2inch |
Intex Aqua Star L 8GB | 74/100 | 5.0inch |
"ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Intex Aqua Star L 8GB", which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" is 1080 x 1920, and pixel density is 423ppi. Also, the resolution on the "Intex Aqua Star L 8GB" is 480 x 854, and pixel density is 195ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" has much higher pixel density than the "Intex Aqua Star L 8GB", with a difference of roughly 228ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" is superior to the "Intex Aqua Star L 8GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" over the "Intex Aqua Star L 8GB".
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
ZTE Axon mini 32GB | 85/100 | 423ppi |
Intex Aqua Star L 8GB | 25/100 | 195ppi |
"ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Intex Aqua Star L 8GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" is 2800.0mAh, and the "Intex Aqua Star L 8GB" is 2000.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" has greater battery capacity than the "Intex Aqua Star L 8GB", with a 800mAh difference. Since the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" can be used for longer periods without recharging than the "Intex Aqua Star L 8GB", it is great for outdoor use. If you want a smartphone with a longer battery life, we recommend the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" over the "Intex Aqua Star L 8GB".
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
ZTE Axon mini 32GB | 62/100 | 2800.0mAh |
Intex Aqua Star L 8GB | 50/100 | 2000.0mAh |
Want to read it together
"ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Intex Aqua Star L 8GB", which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
The "ZTE Axon mini 32GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm MSM8939v2 Snapdragon 616, with performance measured at 1.5GHz+1.2GHz×8(8.0-cores). Also, the "Intex Aqua Star L 8GB"'s CPU is a Mediatek MT6582M, with performance measured at 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" has considerably higher specs than the "Intex Aqua Star L 8GB". In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" is superior to the "Intex Aqua Star L 8GB". If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" over the "Intex Aqua Star L 8GB".
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
ZTE Axon mini 32GB | 63/100 | 1.5GHz+1.2GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
Intex Aqua Star L 8GB | 16/100 | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
"ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Intex Aqua Star L 8GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
The weight of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" is 3.0GB and the weight of the "Intex Aqua Star L 8GB" is 1.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "Intex Aqua Star L 8GB", with a difference of about 2GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" is superior to the "Intex Aqua Star L 8GB". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" over the "Intex Aqua Star L 8GB".
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
ZTE Axon mini 32GB | 60/100 | 3.0GB |
Intex Aqua Star L 8GB | 20/100 | 1.0GB |
"ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Intex Aqua Star L 8GB", which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" is 32.0GB. Also the "Intex Aqua Star L 8GB" is 8.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "Intex Aqua Star L 8GB", with a roughly 24GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" is superior to the "Intex Aqua Star L 8GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" over the "Intex Aqua Star L 8GB".
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
ZTE Axon mini 32GB | 55/100 | 32.0GB |
Intex Aqua Star L 8GB | 24/100 | 8.0GB |
"ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Intex Aqua Star L 8GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"ZTE Axon mini 32GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Also, "Intex Aqua Star L 8GB" has a 8.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Intex Aqua Star L 8GB", with a roughly 5MP difference. In terms of taking or shooting high resolution pictures or videos that will look clean when printed, the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" is superior to the "Intex Aqua Star L 8GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting videos and taking pictures, we recommend the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" over the "Intex Aqua Star L 8GB".
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
ZTE Axon mini 32GB | 61/100 | 13.0MP |
Intex Aqua Star L 8GB | 50/100 | 8.0MP |
"ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Intex Aqua Star L 8GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"ZTE Axon mini 32GB" has an 8.0MP front camera and "Intex Aqua Star L 8GB" has an 2.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Intex Aqua Star L 8GB", with a roughly 6MP difference. As a result, the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" is more suited than the "Intex Aqua Star L 8GB" for shooting videos and taking pictures. If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting high resolution selfies which will look clean when printed, we recommend the "ZTE Axon mini 32GB" over the "Intex Aqua Star L 8GB".
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
ZTE Axon mini 32GB | 58/100 | 8.0MP |
Intex Aqua Star L 8GB | 15/100 | 2.0MP |
"ZTE Axon mini 32GB" and "Intex Aqua Star L 8GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
ZTE Axon mini 32GB | Intex Aqua Star L 8GB | |
Image | ||
Maker | ZTE | Intex |
Release date | 2015-11 | 2015-01 |
Color | Gold/Chromium Silver/Rose Gold | White/black |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 70.0mm x 143.5mm x 7.9mm | 72.9mm x 141.0mm x 8.0mm |
Weight | 140.0g | 130.0g |
Display size | 5.2inch | 5.0inch |
Display type | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 1920 | 480 x 854 |
Pixel density | 423ppi | 195ppi |
Battery capacity | 2800.0mAh | 2000.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8939v2 Snapdragon 616 | Mediatek MT6582M |
CPU specs | 1.5GHz+1.2GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 3.0GB | 1.0GB |
Storage size | 32.0GB | 8.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 8.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 2.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |