Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Which is better, ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB or AXON mini 32GB? We compared their features and specs in detail

Created date: 2018-09-30 23:17:27, Updated date: 2020-04-16 14:32:12

ZTE Boost Max+ 16GBAXON mini 32GB
ZTE Boost Max+ 16GBAXON mini 32GB

Are you having trouble comparing the differences in features and performance of the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" and "AXON mini 32GB", or unsure about their differences in ease-of-use, and wondering which to buy? We did a deep-dive comparison of the features, specs, and capabilities of these two smartphone, and provided our rating of which one was a better buy.

ZTE Boost Max+ 16GBAXON mini 32GB
ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB

AXON mini 32GB

General rating:

48/100

(The 2451th of all smartphones)

62.3/100

(The 252th of all smartphones)

Holding comfort
48/100
71/100
Weight
52/100
77/100
Screen size
85/100
77/100
Display quality
51/100
85/100
Battery life
71/100
62/100
Processing power
33/100
66/100
Memory capacity
50/100
60/100
Storage capacity
50/100
55/100
Rear camera performance
50/100
61/100
Front camera performance
5/100
58/100

"ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" and "AXON mini 32GB", performance comparison

"ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" and "AXON mini 32GB" size comparison. Which to choose?

The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.

The "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" has a width of 82.6mm, a length of 165.1mm, and a thickness of 10.2mm. Also, the "AXON mini 32GB" has a width of 70.0mm, a length of 143.5mm, and a thickness of 7.9mm.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "AXON mini 32GB" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB". The "AXON mini 32GB" excels over the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "AXON mini 32GB" over the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB".

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "AXON mini 32GB" is a more compact size than the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB". For that reason the "AXON mini 32GB" has higher one-handed operability, and has greater portability, being less likely to get in the way when being carried. For these reasons, we recommend the "AXON mini 32GB".

Comparing the overall size of the two devices, the "AXON mini 32GB" is a considerably larger size than the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB". In terms of being more convenient to use one-handed, and less likely to get in the way when you're not using it, the "AXON mini 32GB" is superior to the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB". If you're going for the smart phone sized to be easiest to carry and handle with one hand, we recommend buying the "AXON mini 32GB" over the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB".

ScoreDimensions (width x height x thickness)
ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB48/10082.6mm x 165.1mm x 10.2mm
AXON mini 32GB71/10070.0mm x 143.5mm x 7.9mm

"ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" and "AXON mini 32GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison

The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.

The weight of the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" is about 194.8g, and the weight of the "AXON mini 32GB" is about 132.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "AXON mini 32GB" is a considerably lighter smart phone than the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB", and there is a difference of about 62.8g. In terms of the burden placed upon your fingers and wrist, the "AXON mini 32GB" is superior to the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB". If you are going for a smart phone that won't lead to hand fatigue even after extended use, and is less likely to place a burden on your fingers, we recommend purchasing the "AXON mini 32GB" over the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB".

ScoreWeight
ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB52/100194.8g
AXON mini 32GB77/100132.0g

"ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" and "AXON mini 32GB", whose display is easier to use?

The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.

The "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" has a 5.7inch display. Also, the "AXON mini 32GB" has a 5.2inch display. Comparing the screen size, the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" has a larger screen compared to the "AXON mini 32GB", with a roughly 0.5inch difference. As a result, the user is less likely to mistap when using apps on the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" than on the "AXON mini 32GB", and is also able to enjoy videos and games on a larger screen. Therefore, we recommend the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB".

ScoreDisplay size
ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB85/1005.7inch
AXON mini 32GB77/1005.2inch

"ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" and "AXON mini 32GB", which has a clearer display?

Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.

The resolution on the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" is 720 x 1280, and pixel density is 257ppi. Also, the resolution on the "AXON mini 32GB" is 1080 x 1920, and pixel density is 423ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "AXON mini 32GB" has much higher pixel density than the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB", with a difference of roughly 166ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "AXON mini 32GB" is superior to the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "AXON mini 32GB" over the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB".

ScorePixel density
ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB51/100257ppi
AXON mini 32GB85/100423ppi

"ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" and "AXON mini 32GB", a summary of the differences in battery life

Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.

The "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" is 3400.0mAh, and the "AXON mini 32GB" is 2800.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" has greater battery capacity than the "AXON mini 32GB", with a 600mAh difference. If battery is a priority, then the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" is recommended over the "AXON mini 32GB".

ScoreBattery capacity
ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB71/1003400.0mAh
AXON mini 32GB62/1002800.0mAh

"ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" and "AXON mini 32GB", which has better CPU?

CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.

Also, the "AXON mini 32GB"'s CPU is a Snapdragon 615 MSM8939, with performance measured at 1.7GHz×8(8.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "AXON mini 32GB" has considerably higher specs than the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB". In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the "AXON mini 32GB" is superior to the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB". If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the "AXON mini 32GB" over the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB".

ScoreCPU specs
ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB33/1001.2GHz×4(4.0-cores)
AXON mini 32GB66/1001.7GHz×8(8.0-cores)

"ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" and "AXON mini 32GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?

RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.

The weight of the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" is 2.0GB and the weight of the "AXON mini 32GB" is 3.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "AXON mini 32GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB", with a difference of about 1GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "AXON mini 32GB" is superior to the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "AXON mini 32GB" over the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB".

ScoreRAM size
ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB50/1002.0GB
AXON mini 32GB60/1003.0GB

"ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" and "AXON mini 32GB", which has more data storage?

Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.

The data storage capacity of the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" is 16.0GB. Also the "AXON mini 32GB" is 32.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "AXON mini 32GB" has a greater storage capacity compared to the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB", with a roughly 16GB difference. As a result, the "AXON mini 32GB" can take more pictures and videos, and have more applications installed, than the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB". Therefore, we recommend the "AXON mini 32GB".

ScoreStorage size
ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB50/10016.0GB
AXON mini 32GB55/10032.0GB

"ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" and "AXON mini 32GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" has a 8.0MP main camera. Also, "AXON mini 32GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "AXON mini 32GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB", with a roughly 5MP difference. In terms of taking or shooting high resolution pictures or videos that will look clean when printed, the "AXON mini 32GB" is superior to the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting videos and taking pictures, we recommend the "AXON mini 32GB" over the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB".

ScoreRear-camera resolution
ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB50/1008.0MP
AXON mini 32GB61/10013.0MP

"ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" and "AXON mini 32GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" has an 1.0MP front camera and "AXON mini 32GB" has an 8.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "AXON mini 32GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB", with a roughly 7MP difference. As a result, the "AXON mini 32GB" is more suited than the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" for shooting videos and taking pictures. If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting high resolution selfies which will look clean when printed, we recommend the "AXON mini 32GB" over the "ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB".

ScoreFront-camera resolution
ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB5/1001.0MP
AXON mini 32GB58/1008.0MP

"ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB" and "AXON mini 32GB", performance comparison by specification sheet

ZTE Boost Max+ 16GBAXON mini 32GB
ImageZTE Boost Max+ 16GBAXON mini 32GB
MakerZTEZTE
Release date2015-072015-12-25
ColorGold/
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)82.6mm x 165.1mm x 10.2mm70.0mm x 143.5mm x 7.9mm
Weight194.8g132.0g
Display size5.7inch5.2inch
Display typeIPS LCDAMOLED
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 12801080 x 1920
Pixel density257ppi423ppi
Battery capacity3400.0mAh2800.0mAh
CPU specs1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores)1.7GHz×8(8.0-cores)
RAM size2.0GB3.0GB
Storage size16.0GB32.0GB
Rear-camera resolution8.0MP13.0MP
Front-camera resolution1.0MP8.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

Articles related to ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB
Articles related to AXON mini 32GB

ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB

Articles related to ZTE Boost Max+ 16GB
Articles related to AXON mini 32GB

AXON mini 32GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as AXON mini 32GB

New articles