Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

ZTE Grand S II 16GB vs BLU Vivo XL3 32GB: Which is the best?

Created date: 2018-09-30 23:03:28, Updated date: 2021-10-20 20:44:40

ZTE Grand S II 16GBBLU Vivo XL3 32GB
ZTE Grand S II 16GBBLU Vivo XL3 32GB

Here's our thorough comparison of the difference in performance and function between the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and "BLU Vivo XL3 32GB". Which one should you buy? We'll compare and explain what differs between the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and "BLU Vivo XL3 32GB" in a way that even people who aren't used to choosing between two similar products can understand.

ZTE Grand S II 16GBBLU Vivo XL3 32GB
ZTE Grand S II 16GB

BLU Vivo XL3 32GB

General rating:
Holding comfortrating-image3.0
59/100
rating-image3.5
70/100
Weightrating-image4.1
82/100
rating-image3.7
73/100
Screen sizerating-image4.1
82/100
rating-image4.1
82/100
Display qualityrating-image4.3
85/100
rating-image3.0
59/100
Battery liferating-image2.9
57/100
rating-image3.3
65/100
Processing powerrating-image2.7
54/100
rating-image2.5
50/100
Memory capacityrating-image2.5
50/100
rating-image3.0
60/100
Storage capacityrating-image2.5
50/100
rating-image2.8
55/100
Rear camera performancerating-image3.1
61/100
rating-image3.1
61/100
Front camera performancerating-image2.5
50/100
rating-image3.6
71/100

"ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and "BLU Vivo XL3 32GB", performance comparison

"ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and "BLU Vivo XL3 32GB" size comparison. Which to choose?

The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.

The "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" has a width of 77.0mm, a length of 157.0mm, and a thickness of 7.9mm. Also, the "BLU Vivo XL3 32GB" has a width of 70.7mm, a length of 147.7mm, and a thickness of 8.0mm.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "BLU Vivo XL3 32GB" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB". The "BLU Vivo XL3 32GB" excels over the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "BLU Vivo XL3 32GB" over the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB".

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and the "BLU Vivo XL3 32GB". For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

Comparing the overall size of the two devices, the "BLU Vivo XL3 32GB" has a large size compared to the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB". For that reason the "BLU Vivo XL3 32GB" is a size that is easier to use in one hand and comfortably carry than the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB". That's why we recommend the "BLU Vivo XL3 32GB".

ScoreDimensions (width x height x thickness)
ZTE Grand S II 16GB59/10077.0mm x 157.0mm x 7.9mm
BLU Vivo XL3 32GB70/10070.7mm x 147.7mm x 8.0mm

"ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and "BLU Vivo XL3 32GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison

The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.

The weight of the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" is about 120.0g, and the weight of the "BLU Vivo XL3 32GB" is about 143.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" is a lighter smart phone than the "BLU Vivo XL3 32GB", with a difference of about 23g. For that reason the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" is a smart phone that is less likely than the "BLU Vivo XL3 32GB"to put a burden on your fingers and wrist when used for an extended period. That's why we recommend the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" over the "BLU Vivo XL3 32GB".

ScoreWeight
ZTE Grand S II 16GB82/100120.0g
BLU Vivo XL3 32GB73/100143.0g

"ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and "BLU Vivo XL3 32GB", whose display is easier to use?

The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.

The "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" has a 5.5inch display. Also, the "BLU Vivo XL3 32GB" has a 5.5inch display. Comparing the screen size, there is a negligible difference in screen size between the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and the "BLU Vivo XL3 32GB". As a result, the app buttons on both are equally easy to press. We recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreDisplay size
ZTE Grand S II 16GB82/1005.5inch
BLU Vivo XL3 32GB82/1005.5inch

"ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and "BLU Vivo XL3 32GB", which has a clearer display?

Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.

The resolution on the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" is 1080 x 1920, and pixel density is 400ppi. Also, the resolution on the "BLU Vivo XL3 32GB" is 720 x 1440, and pixel density is 292ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" has much higher pixel density than the "BLU Vivo XL3 32GB", with a difference of roughly 108ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" is superior to the "BLU Vivo XL3 32GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" over the "BLU Vivo XL3 32GB".

ScorePixel density
ZTE Grand S II 16GB85/100400ppi
BLU Vivo XL3 32GB59/100292ppi

"ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and "BLU Vivo XL3 32GB", a summary of the differences in battery life

Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.

The "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" is 2500.0mAh, and the "BLU Vivo XL3 32GB" is 3000.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "BLU Vivo XL3 32GB" has greater battery capacity than the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB", with a 500mAh difference. If battery is a priority, then the "BLU Vivo XL3 32GB" is recommended over the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB".

ScoreBattery capacity
ZTE Grand S II 16GB57/1002500.0mAh
BLU Vivo XL3 32GB65/1003000.0mAh

"ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and "BLU Vivo XL3 32GB", which has better CPU?

CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.

The "ZTE Grand S II 16GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm MSM8674, with performance measured at 2.2GHz×4(4.0-cores). Also, the "BLU Vivo XL3 32GB"'s CPU is a Mediatek MT6737, with performance measured at 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, there is almost no difference in the specs of the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and the "BLU Vivo XL3 32GB". For that reason the level of smoothness felt when using apps and comfortable handling of games is about the same. For that reason it is better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreCPU specs
ZTE Grand S II 16GB54/1002.2GHz×4(4.0-cores)
BLU Vivo XL3 32GB50/1001.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)

"ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and "BLU Vivo XL3 32GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?

RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.

The weight of the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" is 2.0GB and the weight of the "BLU Vivo XL3 32GB" is 3.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "BLU Vivo XL3 32GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB", with a difference of about 1GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "BLU Vivo XL3 32GB" is superior to the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "BLU Vivo XL3 32GB" over the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB".

ScoreRAM size
ZTE Grand S II 16GB50/1002.0GB
BLU Vivo XL3 32GB60/1003.0GB

"ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and "BLU Vivo XL3 32GB", which has more data storage?

Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.

The data storage capacity of the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" is 16.0GB. Also the "BLU Vivo XL3 32GB" is 32.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "BLU Vivo XL3 32GB" has a greater storage capacity compared to the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB", with a roughly 16GB difference. As a result, the "BLU Vivo XL3 32GB" can take more pictures and videos, and have more applications installed, than the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB". Therefore, we recommend the "BLU Vivo XL3 32GB".

ScoreStorage size
ZTE Grand S II 16GB50/10016.0GB
BLU Vivo XL3 32GB55/10032.0GB

"ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and "BLU Vivo XL3 32GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"ZTE Grand S II 16GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Also, "BLU Vivo XL3 32GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and "BLU Vivo XL3 32GB" have approximately the same pixel count. As a result, they can both take pictures and shoot videos of roughly the same quality. Therefore, we recommend comparing the two based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreRear-camera resolution
ZTE Grand S II 16GB61/10013.0MP
BLU Vivo XL3 32GB61/10013.0MP

"ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and "BLU Vivo XL3 32GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"ZTE Grand S II 16GB" has an 5.0MP front camera and "BLU Vivo XL3 32GB" has an 13.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "BLU Vivo XL3 32GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB", with a roughly 8MP difference. As a result, the "BLU Vivo XL3 32GB" is more suited than the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB" for shooting videos and taking pictures. If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting high resolution selfies which will look clean when printed, we recommend the "BLU Vivo XL3 32GB" over the "ZTE Grand S II 16GB".

ScoreFront-camera resolution
ZTE Grand S II 16GB50/1005.0MP
BLU Vivo XL3 32GB71/10013.0MP

"ZTE Grand S II 16GB" and "BLU Vivo XL3 32GB", performance comparison by specification sheet

ZTE Grand S II 16GBBLU Vivo XL3 32GB
ImageZTE Grand S II 16GBBLU Vivo XL3 32GB
MakerZTEBLU
Release date2014-122018-02
ColorSilverSilver/Gold
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)77.0mm x 157.0mm x 7.9mm70.7mm x 147.7mm x 8.0mm
Weight120.0g143.0g
Display size5.5inch5.5inch
Display typeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)1080 x 1920720 x 1440
Pixel density400ppi292ppi
Battery capacity2500.0mAh3000.0mAh
ChipsetQualcomm MSM8674Mediatek MT6737
CPU specs2.2GHz×4(4.0-cores)1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size2.0GB3.0GB
Storage size16.0GB32.0GB
Rear-camera resolution13.0MP13.0MP
Front-camera resolution5.0MP13.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

Articles related to ZTE Grand S II 16GB
Articles related to BLU Vivo XL3 32GB

ZTE Grand S II 16GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as ZTE Grand S II 16GB

Articles related to ZTE Grand S II 16GB
Articles related to BLU Vivo XL3 32GB

BLU Vivo XL3 32GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as BLU Vivo XL3 32GB

New articles