Should you buy ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB or BQ Aquaris U 16GB? Compare the differences in functions and specifications/performances thoroughly
Created date: 2018-09-30 22:11:23, Updated date: 2021-10-20 18:19:29
How did the evaluations between the "ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" differ when we compared the two? We reviewed each of the most commonly scrutinized features. If you are thinking about which smartphone to get, check out this review immediately!
Contents
- 1."ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB", performance comparison
- 1-0."ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2."ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3."ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4."ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5."ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB", which has a clearer display?
- 1-6."ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB", whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7."ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB", which has more data storage?
- 1-8."ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9."ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB", which has better CPU?
- 1-10."ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2."ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
"ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB", performance comparison
"ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The "ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB" has a width of 83.8mm, a length of 162.6mm, and a thickness of 8.9mm. Also, the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" has a width of 71.5mm, a length of 145.0mm, and a thickness of 8.3mm.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB". The "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" excels over the "ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" over the "ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB".
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" is a more compact size than the "ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB". For that reason the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" has higher one-handed operability, and has greater portability, being less likely to get in the way when being carried. For these reasons, we recommend the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB".
Comparing the overall size of the two devices, the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" is a considerably larger size than the "ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB". In terms of being more convenient to use one-handed, and less likely to get in the way when you're not using it, the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" is superior to the "ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB". If you're going for the smart phone sized to be easiest to carry and handle with one hand, we recommend buying the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" over the "ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB".
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB | 48/100 | 83.8mm x 162.6mm x 8.9mm |
BQ Aquaris U 16GB | 68/100 | 71.5mm x 145.0mm x 8.3mm |
"ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
The weight of the "ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB" is about 189.9g, and the weight of the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" is about 140.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" is a considerably lighter smart phone than the "ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB", and there is a difference of about 49.9g. In terms of the burden placed upon your fingers and wrist, the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" is superior to the "ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB". If you are going for a smart phone that won't lead to hand fatigue even after extended use, and is less likely to place a burden on your fingers, we recommend purchasing the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" over the "ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB".
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB | 54/100 | 189.9g |
BQ Aquaris U 16GB | 74/100 | 140.0g |
"ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB", whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The "ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB" has a 5.7inch display. Also, the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" has a 5.0inch display. Comparing the screen size, the "ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB" has a considerably larger screen than the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB", with a difference of approximately 0.7inch. The "ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB" is superior to the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" in terms of its larger buttons and the intensity of the user's experience when playing games and watching videos. In addition, the larger screen on the "ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB" has the benefit of being easier on the user's eyes. If you are looking for a smartphone that you are less likely to mistap, offers a more intense viewing and gaming experience, and decreases eyestrain, then we recommend the "ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB" over the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB".
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB | 85/100 | 5.7inch |
BQ Aquaris U 16GB | 74/100 | 5.0inch |
"ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB", which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the "ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB" is 720 x 1280, and pixel density is 257ppi. Also, the resolution on the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" is 720 x 1280, and pixel density is 293ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" has a higher pixel density than the "ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB", with a difference of roughly 36ppi. As a result, images and videos on the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" have better picture quality than on the "ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB", and the former is also easier on the eyes. Therefore, we recommend the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB".
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB | 51/100 | 257ppi |
BQ Aquaris U 16GB | 59/100 | 293ppi |
"ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
The "ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB" is 3400.0mAh, and the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" is 3080.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, there is a negligible difference in battery capacity between the "ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB". Since both have roughly equal battery life, you are better off comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB | 71/100 | 3400.0mAh |
BQ Aquaris U 16GB | 66/100 | 3080.0mAh |
Want to read it together
"ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB", which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
The "ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm MSM8926 Snapdragon 400, with performance measured at 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores). Also, the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm MSM8937 Snapdragon 430, with performance measured at 1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" has considerably higher specs than the "ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB". In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" is superior to the "ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB". If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" over the "ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB".
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB | 33/100 | 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
BQ Aquaris U 16GB | 60/100 | 1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
"ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
The weight of the "ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB" is 2.0GB and the weight of the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" is 2.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, there is almost no difference in the amount of RAM of the "ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB" and the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB". For that reason they have about the same level of multitasking performance and 3D game and VR smoothness. That's why it is better to make a comparison in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB | 50/100 | 2.0GB |
BQ Aquaris U 16GB | 50/100 | 2.0GB |
"ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB", which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the "ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB" is 16.0GB. Also the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" is 16.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, there is a negligible difference in storage capacity between the "ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB". As a result, you can save roughly the same amount of pictures, and install roughly the same amount of applications, on either phone. You are better off comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB | 50/100 | 16.0GB |
BQ Aquaris U 16GB | 50/100 | 16.0GB |
"ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB" has a 8.0MP main camera. Also, "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB", with a roughly 5MP difference. In terms of taking or shooting high resolution pictures or videos that will look clean when printed, the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" is superior to the "ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting videos and taking pictures, we recommend the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" over the "ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB".
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB | 50/100 | 8.0MP |
BQ Aquaris U 16GB | 61/100 | 13.0MP |
"ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB" has an 6.0MP front camera and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" has an 5.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" have approximately the same pixel count. As a result, they can both take pictures and shoot videos of roughly the same quality. Therefore, we recommend comparing the two based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB | 52/100 | 6.0MP |
BQ Aquaris U 16GB | 50/100 | 5.0MP |
"ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB" and "BQ Aquaris U 16GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
ZTE Zmax (2014) 16GB | BQ Aquaris U 16GB | |
Image | ||
Maker | ZTE | BQ |
Release date | 2014-09 | 2016-09 |
Color | Black | Black |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 83.8mm x 162.6mm x 8.9mm | 71.5mm x 145.0mm x 8.3mm |
Weight | 189.9g | 140.0g |
Display size | 5.7inch | 5.0inch |
Display type | TFT | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1280 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 257ppi | 293ppi |
Battery capacity | 3400.0mAh | 3080.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8926 Snapdragon 400 | Qualcomm MSM8937 Snapdragon 430 |
CPU specs | 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores) | 1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 2.0GB | 2.0GB |
Storage size | 16.0GB | 16.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 6.0MP | 5.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |