Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB vs Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB: Full Comparison!
Created date: 2018-09-30 22:27:33, Updated date: 2021-10-20 16:36:16
Are you having trouble comparing the differences in features and performance of the "Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB" and "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB", or unsure about their differences in ease-of-use, and wondering which to buy? We did a deep-dive comparison of the features, specs, and capabilities of these two smartphone, and provided our rating of which one was a better buy.
Contents
- 1."Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB" and "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB", performance comparison
- 1-0."Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB" and "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2."Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB" and "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3."Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB" and "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4."Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB" and "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5."Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB" and "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB", which has a clearer display?
- 1-6."Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB" and "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB", whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7."Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB" and "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB", which has more data storage?
- 1-8."Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB" and "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9."Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB" and "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB", which has better CPU?
- 1-10."Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB" and "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2."Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB" and "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
"Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB" and "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB", performance comparison
"Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB" and "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The "Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB" has a width of 68.5mm, a length of 139.2mm, and a thickness of 8.9mm. Also, the "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB" has a width of 71.2mm, a length of 142.4mm, and a thickness of 6.9mm.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't much difference between the "Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB" and "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB" in terms of size. For that reason, the ease of gripping and carrying the devices in one hand is about the same for both. Therefore it's better to compare them in terms of performance and functionality.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the "Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB" and the "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB". For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Comparing the overall size of the two devices, there isn't a big difference in size between the "Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB" and the "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB". For that reason the ease of carrying and use with one hand is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB | 72/100 | 68.5mm x 139.2mm x 8.9mm |
Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB | 71/100 | 71.2mm x 142.4mm x 6.9mm |
"Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB" and "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
The weight of the "Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB" is about 149.0g, and the weight of the "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB" is about 145.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, there isn't much difference in weight between the "Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB" and "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB". That's why the likelihood of fatigue in the fingers and wrists after extended use is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB | 70/100 | 149.0g |
Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB | 72/100 | 145.0g |
"Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB" and "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB", whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The "Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB" has a 5.0inch display. Also, the "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB" has a 5.0inch display. Comparing the screen size, there is a negligible difference in screen size between the "Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB" and the "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB". As a result, the app buttons on both are equally easy to press. We recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB | 74/100 | 5.0inch |
Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB | 74/100 | 5.0inch |
"Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB" and "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB", which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the "Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB" is 1080 x 1920, and pixel density is 440ppi. Also, the resolution on the "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB" is 720 x 1280, and pixel density is 293ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB" has much higher pixel density than the "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB", with a difference of roughly 147ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB" is superior to the "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB" over the "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB".
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB | 85/100 | 440ppi |
Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB | 59/100 | 293ppi |
"Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB" and "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
The "Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB" is 3080.0mAh, and the "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB" is 2350.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB" has greater battery capacity than the "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB", with a 730mAh difference. Since the "Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB" can be used for longer periods without recharging than the "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB", it is great for outdoor use. If you want a smartphone with a longer battery life, we recommend the "Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB" over the "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB".
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB | 66/100 | 3080.0mAh |
Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB | 55/100 | 2350.0mAh |
"Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB" and "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB", which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
The "Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm MSM8974AC Snapdragon 801, with performance measured at 2.5GHz×4(4.0-cores). Also, the "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB"'s CPU is a Mediatek MT6753, with performance measured at 1.5GHz×8(8.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB" has higher specs compared to the "Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB". For that reason, the "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB" allows for more comfortable use of apps, and games that run more smoothly. That's why we recommend the "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB" over the "Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB".
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB | 67/100 | 2.5GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB | 74/100 | 1.5GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
"Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB" and "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
The weight of the "Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB" is 3.0GB and the weight of the "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB" is 3.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, there is almost no difference in the amount of RAM of the "Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB" and the "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB". For that reason they have about the same level of multitasking performance and 3D game and VR smoothness. That's why it is better to make a comparison in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB | 60/100 | 3.0GB |
Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB | 60/100 | 3.0GB |
"Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB" and "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB", which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the "Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB" is 64.0GB. Also the "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB" is 32.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB", with a roughly 32GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB" is superior to the "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB" over the "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB".
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB | 67/100 | 64.0GB |
Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB | 55/100 | 32.0GB |
"Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB" and "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Also, "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB" and "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB" have approximately the same pixel count. As a result, they can both take pictures and shoot videos of roughly the same quality. Therefore, we recommend comparing the two based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB | 61/100 | 13.0MP |
Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB | 61/100 | 13.0MP |
"Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB" and "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB" has an 8.0MP front camera and "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB" has an 5.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB" has a higher pixel count than the "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB", with a roughly 3MP difference. As a result, the "Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB" is better able to take high quality selfies than the "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB", and the pictures will look cleaner when printed. Therefore, we recommend the "Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB".
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB | 58/100 | 8.0MP |
Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB | 50/100 | 5.0MP |
"Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB" and "Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
Xiaomi Mi 4 (2014) 64GB | Panasonic Eluga Turbo 32GB | |
Image | ||
Maker | Xiaomi | Panasonic |
Release date | 2014-08 | 2016-01 |
Color | Black/White | Marine Blue/Champagne Gold/Rose Gold |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 68.5mm x 139.2mm x 8.9mm | 71.2mm x 142.4mm x 6.9mm |
Weight | 149.0g | 145.0g |
Display size | 5.0inch | 5.0inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 1920 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 440ppi | 293ppi |
Battery capacity | 3080.0mAh | 2350.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8974AC Snapdragon 801 | Mediatek MT6753 |
CPU specs | 2.5GHz×4(4.0-cores) | 1.5GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 3.0GB | 3.0GB |
Storage size | 64.0GB | 32.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 5.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |