Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

XOLO Win Q900s 8GB vs Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB: Specs & Scores

Created date: 2018-09-30 23:00:55, Updated date: 2020-04-16 15:35:53

XOLO Win Q900s 8GBPhilips W6610 (2014) 4GB
XOLO Win Q900s 8GBPhilips W6610 (2014) 4GB

How did the evaluations between the "XOLO Win Q900s 8GB" and "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB" differ when we compared the two? We reviewed each of the most commonly scrutinized features. If you are thinking about which smartphone to get, check out this review immediately!

XOLO Win Q900s 8GBPhilips W6610 (2014) 4GB
XOLO Win Q900s 8GB

Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB

General rating:
Holding comfortrating-image3.9
78/100
rating-image2.9
58/100
Weightrating-image4.5
90/100
rating-image2.5
50/100
Screen sizerating-image3.5
69/100
rating-image3.7
74/100
Display qualityrating-image3.2
64/100
rating-image1.8
36/100
Battery liferating-image2.2
44/100
rating-image4.2
83/100
Processing powerrating-image1
14/100
rating-image1
16/100
Memory capacityrating-image1.0
20/100
rating-image1.0
20/100
Storage capacityrating-image1.2
24/100
rating-image1
11/100
Rear camera performancerating-image2.5
50/100
rating-image2.5
50/100
Front camera performancerating-image1
15/100
rating-image1
15/100

"XOLO Win Q900s 8GB" and "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB", performance comparison

"XOLO Win Q900s 8GB" and "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB" size comparison. Which to choose?

The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.

The "XOLO Win Q900s 8GB" has a width of 67.2mm, a length of 135.8mm, and a thickness of 7.2mm. Also, the "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB" has a width of 74.1mm, a length of 145.4mm, and a thickness of 11.4mm.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "XOLO Win Q900s 8GB" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB". The "XOLO Win Q900s 8GB" excels over the "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "XOLO Win Q900s 8GB" over the "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB".

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "XOLO Win Q900s 8GB" is a more compact size than the "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB". For that reason the "XOLO Win Q900s 8GB" has higher one-handed operability, and has greater portability, being less likely to get in the way when being carried. For these reasons, we recommend the "XOLO Win Q900s 8GB".

Comparing the overall size of the two devices, the "XOLO Win Q900s 8GB" is a considerably larger size than the "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB". In terms of being more convenient to use one-handed, and less likely to get in the way when you're not using it, the "XOLO Win Q900s 8GB" is superior to the "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB". If you're going for the smart phone sized to be easiest to carry and handle with one hand, we recommend buying the "XOLO Win Q900s 8GB" over the "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB".

ScoreDimensions (width x height x thickness)
XOLO Win Q900s 8GB78/10067.2mm x 135.8mm x 7.2mm
Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB58/10074.1mm x 145.4mm x 11.4mm

"XOLO Win Q900s 8GB" and "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison

The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.

The weight of the "XOLO Win Q900s 8GB" is about 100.0g, and the weight of the "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB" is about 200.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "XOLO Win Q900s 8GB" is a considerably lighter smart phone than the "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB", and there is a difference of about 100g. In terms of the burden placed upon your fingers and wrist, the "XOLO Win Q900s 8GB" is superior to the "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB". If you are going for a smart phone that won't lead to hand fatigue even after extended use, and is less likely to place a burden on your fingers, we recommend purchasing the "XOLO Win Q900s 8GB" over the "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB".

ScoreWeight
XOLO Win Q900s 8GB90/100100.0g
Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB50/100200.0g

"XOLO Win Q900s 8GB" and "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB", whose display is easier to use?

The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.

The "XOLO Win Q900s 8GB" has a 4.7inch display. Also, the "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB" has a 5.0inch display. Comparing the screen size, there is a negligible difference in screen size between the "XOLO Win Q900s 8GB" and the "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB". As a result, the app buttons on both are equally easy to press. We recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreDisplay size
XOLO Win Q900s 8GB69/1004.7inch
Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB74/1005.0inch

"XOLO Win Q900s 8GB" and "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB", which has a clearer display?

Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.

The resolution on the "XOLO Win Q900s 8GB" is 720 x 1280, and pixel density is 312ppi. Also, the resolution on the "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB" is 540 x 960, and pixel density is 220ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "XOLO Win Q900s 8GB" has much higher pixel density than the "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB", with a difference of roughly 92ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "XOLO Win Q900s 8GB" is superior to the "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "XOLO Win Q900s 8GB" over the "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB".

ScorePixel density
XOLO Win Q900s 8GB64/100312ppi
Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB36/100220ppi

"XOLO Win Q900s 8GB" and "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB", a summary of the differences in battery life

Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.

The "XOLO Win Q900s 8GB" is 1800.0mAh, and the "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB" is 5300.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB" has greater battery capacity than the "XOLO Win Q900s 8GB", with a 3500mAh difference. Since the "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB" can be used for longer periods without recharging than the "XOLO Win Q900s 8GB", it is great for outdoor use. If you want a smartphone with a longer battery life, we recommend the "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB" over the "XOLO Win Q900s 8GB".

ScoreBattery capacity
XOLO Win Q900s 8GB44/1001800.0mAh
Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB83/1005300.0mAh

"XOLO Win Q900s 8GB" and "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB", which has better CPU?

CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.

The "XOLO Win Q900s 8GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm MSM8212 Snapdragon 200, with performance measured at 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, there is almost no difference in the specs of the "XOLO Win Q900s 8GB" and the "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB". For that reason the level of smoothness felt when using apps and comfortable handling of games is about the same. For that reason it is better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreCPU specs
XOLO Win Q900s 8GB14/1001.2GHz×4(4.0-cores)
Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB16/1001.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)

"XOLO Win Q900s 8GB" and "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?

RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.

The weight of the "XOLO Win Q900s 8GB" is 1.0GB and the weight of the "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB" is 1.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, there is almost no difference in the amount of RAM of the "XOLO Win Q900s 8GB" and the "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB". For that reason they have about the same level of multitasking performance and 3D game and VR smoothness. That's why it is better to make a comparison in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreRAM size
XOLO Win Q900s 8GB20/1001.0GB
Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB20/1001.0GB

"XOLO Win Q900s 8GB" and "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB", which has more data storage?

Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.

The data storage capacity of the "XOLO Win Q900s 8GB" is 8.0GB. Also the "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB" is 4.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "XOLO Win Q900s 8GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB", with a roughly 4GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "XOLO Win Q900s 8GB" is superior to the "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "XOLO Win Q900s 8GB" over the "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB".

ScoreStorage size
XOLO Win Q900s 8GB24/1008.0GB
Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB11/1004.0GB

"XOLO Win Q900s 8GB" and "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"XOLO Win Q900s 8GB" has a 8.0MP main camera. Also, "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB" has a 8.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "XOLO Win Q900s 8GB" and "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB" have approximately the same pixel count. As a result, they can both take pictures and shoot videos of roughly the same quality. Therefore, we recommend comparing the two based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreRear-camera resolution
XOLO Win Q900s 8GB50/1008.0MP
Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB50/1008.0MP

"XOLO Win Q900s 8GB" and "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"XOLO Win Q900s 8GB" has an 2.0MP front camera and "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB" has an 2.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "XOLO Win Q900s 8GB" and "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB" have approximately the same pixel count. As a result, they can both take pictures and shoot videos of roughly the same quality. Therefore, we recommend comparing the two based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreFront-camera resolution
XOLO Win Q900s 8GB15/1002.0MP
Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB15/1002.0MP

"XOLO Win Q900s 8GB" and "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB", performance comparison by specification sheet

XOLO Win Q900s 8GBPhilips W6610 (2014) 4GB
ImageXOLO Win Q900s 8GBPhilips W6610 (2014) 4GB
MakerXOLOPhilips
Release date2014-072014-05
ColorBlack/WhiteBlack
OSWindowsAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)67.2mm x 135.8mm x 7.2mm74.1mm x 145.4mm x 11.4mm
Weight100.0g200.0g
Display size4.7inch5.0inch
Display typeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 1280540 x 960
Pixel density312ppi220ppi
Battery capacity1800.0mAh5300.0mAh
CPU specs1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores)1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size1.0GB1.0GB
Storage size8.0GB4.0GB
Rear-camera resolution8.0MP8.0MP
Front-camera resolution2.0MP2.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

Articles related to XOLO Win Q900s 8GB
Articles related to Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB

XOLO Win Q900s 8GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as XOLO Win Q900s 8GB

Articles related to XOLO Win Q900s 8GB
Articles related to Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB

Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB

New articles