Lava X50 (2016) 8GB vs Celkon A35k Remote 512MB: Specs & Scores
Created date: 2018-11-18 10:59:31, Updated date: 2021-10-20 15:54:54
Are you having trouble comparing the differences in features and performance of the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB", or unsure about their differences in ease-of-use, and wondering which to buy? We did a deep-dive comparison of the features, specs, and capabilities of these two smartphone, and provided our rating of which one was a better buy.
Contents
- 1."Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB", performance comparison
- 1-0."Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2."Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB" size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3."Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4."Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5."Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB", which has a clearer display?
- 1-6."Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB", whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7."Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB", which has more data storage?
- 1-8."Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9."Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB", which has better CPU?
- 1-10."Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB", a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2."Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB", performance comparison by specification sheet
"Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB", performance comparison
"Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB" size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" has a width of 71.8mm, a length of 155.0mm, and a thickness of 8.9mm. Also, the "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB" has a width of 63.0mm, a length of 119.0mm, and a thickness of 10.7mm.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB". The "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB" excels over the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB" over the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB".
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB". The "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB" excels over the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB" over the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB".
Comparing the overall size of the two devices, the "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB" is a considerably larger size than the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB". In terms of being more convenient to use one-handed, and less likely to get in the way when you're not using it, the "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB" is superior to the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB". If you're going for the smart phone sized to be easiest to carry and handle with one hand, we recommend buying the "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB" over the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB".
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
Lava X50 (2016) 8GB | 66/100 | 71.8mm x 155.0mm x 8.9mm |
Celkon A35k Remote 512MB | 79/100 | 63.0mm x 119.0mm x 10.7mm |
"Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
Lava X50 (2016) 8GB | - /100 | |
Celkon A35k Remote 512MB | 89/100 | 102.0g |
"Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB", whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" has a 5.5inch display. Also, the "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB" has a 3.5inch display. Comparing the screen size, the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" has a considerably larger screen than the "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB", with a difference of approximately 2inch. The "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" is superior to the "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB" in terms of its larger buttons and the intensity of the user's experience when playing games and watching videos. In addition, the larger screen on the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" has the benefit of being easier on the user's eyes. If you are looking for a smartphone that you are less likely to mistap, offers a more intense viewing and gaming experience, and decreases eyestrain, then we recommend the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" over the "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB".
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
Lava X50 (2016) 8GB | 82/100 | 5.5inch |
Celkon A35k Remote 512MB | 50/100 | 3.5inch |
"Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB", which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" is 720 x 1280, and pixel density is 267ppi. Also, the resolution on the "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB" is 320 x 480, and pixel density is 164ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" has much higher pixel density than the "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB", with a difference of roughly 103ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" is superior to the "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" over the "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB".
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
Lava X50 (2016) 8GB | 53/100 | 267ppi |
Celkon A35k Remote 512MB | 11/100 | 164ppi |
"Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB", a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
The "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" is 2800.0mAh, and the "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB" is 1400.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" has greater battery capacity than the "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB", with a 1400mAh difference. Since the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" can be used for longer periods without recharging than the "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB", it is great for outdoor use. If you want a smartphone with a longer battery life, we recommend the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" over the "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB".
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
Lava X50 (2016) 8GB | 62/100 | 2800.0mAh |
Celkon A35k Remote 512MB | 32/100 | 1400.0mAh |
Want to read it together
"Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB", which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
Lava X50 (2016) 8GB | - /100 | |
Celkon A35k Remote 512MB | 0/100 | 1.0GHz×1(1.0-cores) |
"Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
The weight of the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" is 2.0GB and the weight of the "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB" is 256.0MB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB", with a difference of about 254GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" is superior to the "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" over the "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB".
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
Lava X50 (2016) 8GB | 50/100 | 2.0GB |
Celkon A35k Remote 512MB | 0/100 | 256.0MB |
"Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB", which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" is 8.0GB. Also the "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB" is 512.0MB. Regarding storage capacity, the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB", with a roughly 504GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" is superior to the "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" over the "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB".
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
Lava X50 (2016) 8GB | 24/100 | 8.0GB |
Celkon A35k Remote 512MB | 0/100 | 512.0MB |
"Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" has a 8.0MP main camera. Also, "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB" has a 15.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB", with a roughly 7MP difference. In terms of taking or shooting high resolution pictures or videos that will look clean when printed, the "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB" is superior to the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting videos and taking pictures, we recommend the "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB" over the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB".
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Lava X50 (2016) 8GB | 50/100 | 8.0MP |
Celkon A35k Remote 512MB | 66/100 | 15.0MP |
"Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Lava X50 (2016) 8GB | 50/100 | 5.0MP |
Celkon A35k Remote 512MB | - /100 |
"Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Celkon A35k Remote 512MB", performance comparison by specification sheet
Lava X50 (2016) 8GB | Celkon A35k Remote 512MB | |
Image | ||
Maker | Lava | Celkon |
Release date | 2016-07 | 2015-06 |
Color | Blue | White/Black/Blue |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 71.8mm x 155.0mm x 8.9mm | 63.0mm x 119.0mm x 10.7mm |
Display size | 5.5inch | 3.5inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | TFT |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1280 | 320 x 480 |
Pixel density | 267ppi | 164ppi |
Battery capacity | 2800.0mAh | 1400.0mAh |
RAM size | 2.0GB | 256.0MB |
Storage size | 8.0GB | 512.0MB |
Rear-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 15.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |