Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Lava X50 (2016) 8GB vs. Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB Specs & Scores

Created date: 2018-11-18 12:03:10, Updated date: 2020-04-15 18:50:01

Lava X50 (2016) 8GBPlum Phantom (2017) 16GB
Lava X50 (2016) 8GBPlum Phantom (2017) 16GB

How did the evaluations between the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" differ when we compared the two? We reviewed each of the most commonly scrutinized features. If you are thinking about which smartphone to get, check out this review immediately!

Lava X50 (2016) 8GBPlum Phantom (2017) 16GB
Lava X50 (2016) 8GB

Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB

General rating:

54.1/100

(The 2304th of all smartphones)

43.4/100

(The 1658th of all smartphones)

Holding comfort
66/100
48/100
Weight
- /100
75/100
Screen size
82/100
90/100
Display quality
53/100
47/100
Battery life
62/100
57/100
Processing power
- /100
16/100
Memory capacity
50/100
20/100
Storage capacity
24/100
50/100
Rear camera performance
50/100
61/100
Front camera performance
50/100
58/100

"Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB", performance comparison

"Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" size comparison. Which to choose?

The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.

The "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" has a width of 71.8mm, a length of 155.0mm, and a thickness of 8.9mm. Also, the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" has a width of 84.2mm, a length of 165.5mm, and a thickness of 8.8mm.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB". The "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" excels over the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" over the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB".

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB". For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

Comparing the overall size of the two devices, the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" is a considerably larger size than the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB". In terms of being more convenient to use one-handed, and less likely to get in the way when you're not using it, the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" is superior to the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB". If you're going for the smart phone sized to be easiest to carry and handle with one hand, we recommend buying the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" over the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB".

ScoreDimensions (width x height x thickness)
Lava X50 (2016) 8GB66/10071.8mm x 155.0mm x 8.9mm
Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB48/10084.2mm x 165.5mm x 8.8mm

"Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison

The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.

ScoreWeight
Lava X50 (2016) 8GB - /100
Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB75/100138.0g

"Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB", whose display is easier to use?

The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.

The "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" has a 5.5inch display. Also, the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" has a 6.0inch display. Comparing the screen size, the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" has a larger screen compared to the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB", with a roughly 0.5inch difference. As a result, the user is less likely to mistap when using apps on the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" than on the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB", and is also able to enjoy videos and games on a larger screen. Therefore, we recommend the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB".

ScoreDisplay size
Lava X50 (2016) 8GB82/1005.5inch
Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB90/1006.0inch

"Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB", which has a clearer display?

Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.

The resolution on the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" is 720 x 1280, and pixel density is 267ppi. Also, the resolution on the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" is 720 x 1280, and pixel density is 244ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" has a higher pixel density than the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB", with a difference of roughly 23ppi. As a result, images and videos on the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" have better picture quality than on the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB", and the former is also easier on the eyes. Therefore, we recommend the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB".

ScorePixel density
Lava X50 (2016) 8GB53/100267ppi
Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB47/100244ppi

"Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB", a summary of the differences in battery life

Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.

The "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" is 2800.0mAh, and the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" is 2500.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, there is a negligible difference in battery capacity between the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB". Since both have roughly equal battery life, you are better off comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreBattery capacity
Lava X50 (2016) 8GB62/1002800.0mAh
Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB57/1002500.0mAh

"Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB", which has better CPU?

CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.

Also, the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB"'s CPU is a Mediatek MT6580A, with performance measured at 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores).

ScoreCPU specs
Lava X50 (2016) 8GB - /100
Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB16/1001.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)

"Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?

RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.

The weight of the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" is 2.0GB and the weight of the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" is 1.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB", with a difference of about 1GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" is superior to the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" over the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB".

ScoreRAM size
Lava X50 (2016) 8GB50/1002.0GB
Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB20/1001.0GB

"Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB", which has more data storage?

Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.

The data storage capacity of the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" is 8.0GB. Also the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" is 16.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB", with a roughly 8GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" is superior to the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" over the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB".

ScoreStorage size
Lava X50 (2016) 8GB24/1008.0GB
Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB50/10016.0GB

"Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" has a 8.0MP main camera. Also, "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB", with a roughly 5MP difference. In terms of taking or shooting high resolution pictures or videos that will look clean when printed, the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" is superior to the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting videos and taking pictures, we recommend the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" over the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB".

ScoreRear-camera resolution
Lava X50 (2016) 8GB50/1008.0MP
Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB61/10013.0MP

"Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" has an 5.0MP front camera and "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" has an 8.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" has a higher pixel count than the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB", with a roughly 3MP difference. As a result, the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" is better able to take high quality selfies than the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB", and the pictures will look cleaner when printed. Therefore, we recommend the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB".

ScoreFront-camera resolution
Lava X50 (2016) 8GB50/1005.0MP
Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB58/1008.0MP

"Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB", performance comparison by specification sheet

Lava X50 (2016) 8GBPlum Phantom (2017) 16GB
ImageLava X50 (2016) 8GBPlum Phantom (2017) 16GB
MakerLavaPlum
Release date2016-072017-10
ColorBlueGray/Gold/Rose Gold/White
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)71.8mm x 155.0mm x 8.9mm84.2mm x 165.5mm x 8.8mm
Display size5.5inch6.0inch
Display typeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 1280720 x 1280
Pixel density267ppi244ppi
Battery capacity2800.0mAh2500.0mAh
RAM size2.0GB1.0GB
Storage size8.0GB16.0GB
Rear-camera resolution8.0MP13.0MP
Front-camera resolution5.0MP8.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

Articles related to Lava X50 (2016) 8GB
Articles related to Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB

Lava X50 (2016) 8GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Lava X50 (2016) 8GB

Articles related to Lava X50 (2016) 8GB
Articles related to Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB

Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB

New articles