Lava X50 (2016) 8GB vs. Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB Specs & Scores
Created date: 2018-11-18 12:03:10, Updated date: 2020-04-15 18:50:01
How did the evaluations between the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" differ when we compared the two? We reviewed each of the most commonly scrutinized features. If you are thinking about which smartphone to get, check out this review immediately!
Lava X50 (2016) 8GB | Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB | |||
General rating: | 54.1/100 (The 2304th of all smartphones) | 43.4/100 (The 1658th of all smartphones) | ||
Holding comfort | 66/100 | 48/100 | ||
Weight | - /100 | 75/100 | ||
Screen size | 82/100 | 90/100 | ||
Display quality | 53/100 | 47/100 | ||
Battery life | 62/100 | 57/100 | ||
Processing power | - /100 | 16/100 | ||
Memory capacity | 50/100 | 20/100 | ||
Storage capacity | 24/100 | 50/100 | ||
Rear camera performance | 50/100 | 61/100 | ||
Front camera performance | 50/100 | 58/100 | ||
Contents
- 1."Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB", performance comparison
- 1-0."Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2."Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3."Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4."Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5."Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB", which has a clearer display?
- 1-6."Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB", whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7."Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB", which has more data storage?
- 1-8."Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9."Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB", which has better CPU?
- 1-10."Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2."Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
"Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB", performance comparison
"Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" has a width of 71.8mm, a length of 155.0mm, and a thickness of 8.9mm. Also, the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" has a width of 84.2mm, a length of 165.5mm, and a thickness of 8.8mm.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB". The "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" excels over the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" over the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB".
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB". For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Comparing the overall size of the two devices, the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" is a considerably larger size than the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB". In terms of being more convenient to use one-handed, and less likely to get in the way when you're not using it, the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" is superior to the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB". If you're going for the smart phone sized to be easiest to carry and handle with one hand, we recommend buying the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" over the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB".
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
Lava X50 (2016) 8GB | 66/100 | 71.8mm x 155.0mm x 8.9mm |
Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB | 48/100 | 84.2mm x 165.5mm x 8.8mm |
"Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
Lava X50 (2016) 8GB | - /100 | |
Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB | 75/100 | 138.0g |
"Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB", whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" has a 5.5inch display. Also, the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" has a 6.0inch display. Comparing the screen size, the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" has a larger screen compared to the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB", with a roughly 0.5inch difference. As a result, the user is less likely to mistap when using apps on the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" than on the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB", and is also able to enjoy videos and games on a larger screen. Therefore, we recommend the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB".
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
Lava X50 (2016) 8GB | 82/100 | 5.5inch |
Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB | 90/100 | 6.0inch |
"Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB", which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" is 720 x 1280, and pixel density is 267ppi. Also, the resolution on the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" is 720 x 1280, and pixel density is 244ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" has a higher pixel density than the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB", with a difference of roughly 23ppi. As a result, images and videos on the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" have better picture quality than on the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB", and the former is also easier on the eyes. Therefore, we recommend the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB".
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
Lava X50 (2016) 8GB | 53/100 | 267ppi |
Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB | 47/100 | 244ppi |
"Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
The "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" is 2800.0mAh, and the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" is 2500.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, there is a negligible difference in battery capacity between the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB". Since both have roughly equal battery life, you are better off comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
Lava X50 (2016) 8GB | 62/100 | 2800.0mAh |
Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB | 57/100 | 2500.0mAh |
Want to read it together
"Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB", which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
Also, the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB"'s CPU is a Mediatek MT6580A, with performance measured at 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores).
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
Lava X50 (2016) 8GB | - /100 | |
Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB | 16/100 | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
"Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
The weight of the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" is 2.0GB and the weight of the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" is 1.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB", with a difference of about 1GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" is superior to the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" over the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB".
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
Lava X50 (2016) 8GB | 50/100 | 2.0GB |
Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB | 20/100 | 1.0GB |
"Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB", which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" is 8.0GB. Also the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" is 16.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB", with a roughly 8GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" is superior to the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" over the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB".
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
Lava X50 (2016) 8GB | 24/100 | 8.0GB |
Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB | 50/100 | 16.0GB |
"Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" has a 8.0MP main camera. Also, "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB", with a roughly 5MP difference. In terms of taking or shooting high resolution pictures or videos that will look clean when printed, the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" is superior to the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting videos and taking pictures, we recommend the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" over the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB".
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Lava X50 (2016) 8GB | 50/100 | 8.0MP |
Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB | 61/100 | 13.0MP |
"Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" has an 5.0MP front camera and "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" has an 8.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" has a higher pixel count than the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB", with a roughly 3MP difference. As a result, the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" is better able to take high quality selfies than the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB", and the pictures will look cleaner when printed. Therefore, we recommend the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB".
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Lava X50 (2016) 8GB | 50/100 | 5.0MP |
Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB | 58/100 | 8.0MP |
"Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
Lava X50 (2016) 8GB | Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB | |
Image | ||
Maker | Lava | Plum |
Release date | 2016-07 | 2017-10 |
Color | Blue | Gray/Gold/Rose Gold/White |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 71.8mm x 155.0mm x 8.9mm | 84.2mm x 165.5mm x 8.8mm |
Display size | 5.5inch | 6.0inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1280 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 267ppi | 244ppi |
Battery capacity | 2800.0mAh | 2500.0mAh |
RAM size | 2.0GB | 1.0GB |
Storage size | 8.0GB | 16.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 5.0MP | 8.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |