Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Lava X50 (2016) 8GB vs Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB

Created date: 2018-11-18 11:26:30, Updated date: 2020-04-16 15:22:17

Lava X50 (2016) 8GBGalaxy A3 (2017) 16GB
Lava X50 (2016) 8GBGalaxy A3 (2017) 16GB

Here's our thorough comparison of the difference in performance and function between the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB". Which one should you buy? We'll compare and explain what differs between the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" in a way that even people who aren't used to choosing between two similar products can understand.

Lava X50 (2016) 8GBGalaxy A3 (2017) 16GB
Lava X50 (2016) 8GB

Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB

General rating:

54.1/100

(The 2304th of all smartphones)

61.1/100

(The 1238th of all smartphones)

Holding comfort
66/100
78/100
Weight
- /100
75/100
Screen size
82/100
69/100
Display quality
53/100
64/100
Battery life
62/100
55/100
Processing power
- /100
64/100
Memory capacity
50/100
50/100
Storage capacity
24/100
50/100
Rear camera performance
50/100
61/100
Front camera performance
50/100
58/100

"Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB", performance comparison

"Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" size comparison. Which to choose?

The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.

The "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" has a width of 71.8mm, a length of 155.0mm, and a thickness of 8.9mm. Also, the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" has a width of 66.2mm, a length of 135.4mm, and a thickness of 7.9mm.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB". The "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" excels over the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" over the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB".

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB". The "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" excels over the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" over the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB".

Comparing the overall size of the two devices, the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" is a considerably larger size than the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB". In terms of being more convenient to use one-handed, and less likely to get in the way when you're not using it, the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" is superior to the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB". If you're going for the smart phone sized to be easiest to carry and handle with one hand, we recommend buying the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" over the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB".

ScoreDimensions (width x height x thickness)
Lava X50 (2016) 8GB66/10071.8mm x 155.0mm x 8.9mm
Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB78/10066.2mm x 135.4mm x 7.9mm

"Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison

The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.

ScoreWeight
Lava X50 (2016) 8GB - /100
Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB75/100138.0g

"Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB", whose display is easier to use?

The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.

The "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" has a 5.5inch display. Also, the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" has a 4.7inch display. Comparing the screen size, the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" has a considerably larger screen than the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB", with a difference of approximately 0.7inch. The "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" is superior to the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" in terms of its larger buttons and the intensity of the user's experience when playing games and watching videos. In addition, the larger screen on the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" has the benefit of being easier on the user's eyes. If you are looking for a smartphone that you are less likely to mistap, offers a more intense viewing and gaming experience, and decreases eyestrain, then we recommend the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" over the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB".

ScoreDisplay size
Lava X50 (2016) 8GB82/1005.5inch
Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB69/1004.7inch

"Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB", which has a clearer display?

Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.

The resolution on the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" is 720 x 1280, and pixel density is 267ppi. Also, the resolution on the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" is 720 x 1280, and pixel density is 312ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" has much higher pixel density than the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB", with a difference of roughly 45ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" is superior to the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" over the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB".

ScorePixel density
Lava X50 (2016) 8GB53/100267ppi
Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB64/100312ppi

"Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB", a summary of the differences in battery life

Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.

The "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" is 2800.0mAh, and the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" is 2350.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" has greater battery capacity than the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB", with a 450mAh difference. If battery is a priority, then the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" is recommended over the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB".

ScoreBattery capacity
Lava X50 (2016) 8GB62/1002800.0mAh
Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB55/1002350.0mAh

"Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB", which has better CPU?

CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.

Also, the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB"'s CPU is a Exynos 7870 Octa, with performance measured at 1.6GHz×8(8.0-cores).

ScoreCPU specs
Lava X50 (2016) 8GB - /100
Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB64/1001.6GHz×8(8.0-cores)

"Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?

RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.

The weight of the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" is 2.0GB and the weight of the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" is 2.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, there is almost no difference in the amount of RAM of the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB". For that reason they have about the same level of multitasking performance and 3D game and VR smoothness. That's why it is better to make a comparison in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreRAM size
Lava X50 (2016) 8GB50/1002.0GB
Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB50/1002.0GB

"Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB", which has more data storage?

Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.

The data storage capacity of the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" is 8.0GB. Also the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" is 16.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB", with a roughly 8GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" is superior to the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" over the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB".

ScoreStorage size
Lava X50 (2016) 8GB24/1008.0GB
Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB50/10016.0GB

"Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" has a 8.0MP main camera. Also, "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB", with a roughly 5MP difference. In terms of taking or shooting high resolution pictures or videos that will look clean when printed, the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" is superior to the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting videos and taking pictures, we recommend the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" over the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB".

ScoreRear-camera resolution
Lava X50 (2016) 8GB50/1008.0MP
Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB61/10013.0MP

"Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" has an 5.0MP front camera and "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" has an 8.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" has a higher pixel count than the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB", with a roughly 3MP difference. As a result, the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" is better able to take high quality selfies than the "Lava X50 (2016) 8GB", and the pictures will look cleaner when printed. Therefore, we recommend the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB".

ScoreFront-camera resolution
Lava X50 (2016) 8GB50/1005.0MP
Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB58/1008.0MP

"Lava X50 (2016) 8GB" and "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB", performance comparison by specification sheet

Lava X50 (2016) 8GBGalaxy A3 (2017) 16GB
ImageLava X50 (2016) 8GBGalaxy A3 (2017) 16GB
MakerLavaSamsung
Release date2016-072017-01
ColorBlueBlack Sky/Gold Sand/Blue Mist/Peach Cloud
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)71.8mm x 155.0mm x 8.9mm66.2mm x 135.4mm x 7.9mm
Display size5.5inch4.7inch
Display typeIPS LCDSuper AMOLED
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 1280720 x 1280
Pixel density267ppi312ppi
Battery capacity2800.0mAh2350.0mAh
RAM size2.0GB2.0GB
Storage size8.0GB16.0GB
Rear-camera resolution8.0MP13.0MP
Front-camera resolution5.0MP8.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

Articles related to Lava X50 (2016) 8GB
Articles related to Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB

Lava X50 (2016) 8GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Lava X50 (2016) 8GB

Articles related to Lava X50 (2016) 8GB
Articles related to Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB

Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB

New articles