Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB vs vivo X20 (2017) 64GB: Specs & Scores

Created date: 2018-11-18 11:00:03, Updated date: 2020-04-16 18:52:07

Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GBvivo X20 (2017) 64GB
Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GBvivo X20 (2017) 64GB

Here's our thorough comparison of the difference in performance and function between the "Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB" and "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB". Which one should you buy? We'll compare and explain what differs between the "Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB" and "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" in a way that even people who aren't used to choosing between two similar products can understand.

Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GBvivo X20 (2017) 64GB
Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB

vivo X20 (2017) 64GB

General rating:
Portabilityrating-image3.6
68.7mm x 146.3mm x 8.7mm
rating-image3.2
75.2mm x 155.9mm x 7.2mm
Weightrating-image3.7
138.3g
rating-image3.3
159.0g
Size of screenrating-image3.9
5.2inch
rating-image4.5
6.01inch
Screen clarityrating-image3.2
309ppi
rating-image4.2
401ppi
Battery durationrating-image3.2
2990.0mAh
rating-image3.4
3250.0mAh
Processing capabilityrating-image3.1
1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores)
rating-image4.3
2.2GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores)
Memory capacityrating-image3.0
3.0GB
rating-image3.5
4.0GB
Storage capacityrating-image2.8
32.0GB
rating-image3.4
64.0GB
Rear camera functionrating-image3.1
13.0MP
rating-image3.0
12.0MP
Front camera functionrating-image2.9
8.0MP
rating-image3.5
12.0MP

Compare Performance and Usability

Size comparison of "Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB" and "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB". Which one would you choose?

Your device's size has a huge influence on how easy it is to hold or to operate with one hand. The smaller your device's width, the easier it will be to hold, but you'll also need to take device thickness into account. And when the length and width are both smaller, you'll find that it's much easier for you to operate it one-handed, since your fingers will find it much easier to reach where you want them to. On the other hand, longer lengths and wider widths might lead to devices that are hard to carry in your pocket, bulky even when you keep them in your bag, and all around less portable.

The "Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB" is 68.7mm wide, 146.3mm tall, and 8.7mm thick. The "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" is 75.2mm tall, 155.9mm wide, and 7.2mm thick.

Comparing the width and thickness of the main unit, the "Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB" is smaller and more compact compared to the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB". Therefore, it is easier to grip and hold the "Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB" than the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB". For this reason, the "Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB" is recommended.

There is no real difference in length or width between the "Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB" and "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB", so they are both about the same in terms of usability, ease of carry, and bulkiness. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.

Comparing the overall size of the main unit, the "Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB" is smaller than the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB". As a result, it is easier to use the "Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB" with one hand compared to the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB", and its size makes it more comfortable to carry around. For this reason, the "Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB" is recommended.

ScoreDimensions (width x height x thickness)
Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB72/10068.7mm x 146.3mm x 8.7mm
vivo X20 (2017) 64GB63/10075.2mm x 155.9mm x 7.2mm

Which one is easier to hold, "Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB" or "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB"? Compare weight

The device weight will effect how quickly you tire from holding it, and how much stress is put on your wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you can hold it without feeling tired. Also, less stress on your wrist will make using it easier and more pleasant. Unless the weight is right for you, it might put too much strain on your body and make using it more stressful.

The "Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB" weighs 138.3g. The "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" clocks in at 159.0g. Comparing the weight of the main unit, the "Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB" is a lighter phone than the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB", with a difference of approximately 20.6g. Therefore, there is less strain on your fingers and wrists even when you use your phone for a long time on the "Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB" compared to the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB". For this reason, the "Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB" is recommended.

ScoreWeight
Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB74/100138.3g
vivo X20 (2017) 64GB66/100159.0g

Which is better in terms of display, "Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB" or "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB"?

Screen size influences how well you can control your device, as well as how clear the display is. With a large screen, the text and buttons in apps will display large enough so you'll be less likely to accidentally tap the button next to the one you were aiming for. Plus, you'll be able to enjoy more high-impact visuals for games and movies.

The screen size on the "Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB" is 5.2inch, and 6.01inch on the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB". Comparing the sizes of the screens and displays, the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" is considerably larger than the "Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB", with a difference of about 0.8inch. Compared to the "Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB", the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" makes buttons in apps easier to press, and the visuals look more impressive in videos and games. The larger screen of the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" also has the advantage of being less tiring on the eyes. If you want to avoid tapping the wrong place, enjoy videos and games on a large screen, and not get tired eyes while using it, we recommend that you buy the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" rather than the "Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB".

ScoreDisplay size
Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB77/1005.2inch
vivo X20 (2017) 64GB90/1006.01inch

Which one has a better display, "Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB" or "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB"?

Pixel density influences how nice your device's screen looks, with high pixel densities making screens look more beautiful, and letting you get more out of your games and movies. Plus, the nicer you screen looks, the less strain you'll be putting on your eyes, so you'll tend to be able to use your device for longer before your eyes get tired.

The screen on the "Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB" has a 720 x 1440 resolution and a pixel density of 309ppi. The "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB", on the other hand, has a screen resolution of 1080 x 2160 and a pixel density of 401ppi. Comparing the screen definition, the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" has a much higher pixel density than the "Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB", with a difference of about 92ppi. The screen on the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" is clear and crisp, and puts less strain on the eyes than that of the "Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB". If you want to choose a smartphone that is gentle on your eyes with a display that shows text and images clearly, we recommend that you buy the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" rather than the "Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB".

ScorePixel density
Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB63/100309ppi
vivo X20 (2017) 64GB84/100401ppi

How is the battery duration of "Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB" different from that of "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" ? See the differences

Battery performance has a big effect on the battery life of your device. However, a high battery capacity doesn't necessarily mean a long battery life. Rather, the rate of power consumption needs to be taken into consideration as well. The larger the screen and the higher the CPU performance, the higher the rate of power consumption on your battery.

The "Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB" has a battery capacity of 2990.0mAh, while the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" has a 3250.0mAh battery. The batteries of both the "Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB" and "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" perform to the same extent. There is also no difference in the battery capacities of the "Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB" and the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB". Since their battery life is practically identical, it would be better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.

ScoreBattery capacity
Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB64/1002990.0mAh
vivo X20 (2017) 64GB68/1003250.0mAh

Which is better in terms of CPU function, "Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB" or "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB"?

Your CPU's speed will influence the processing power of the applications you run, and together with the number of cores in the CPU, as well as its clock frequency, will determine the processing power available for apps. The higher these performance factors, the smoother your games and apps will run. Conversely, if these factors are too low, your apps and games will be sluggish and struggle to run.

The "Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB" is equipped with a Mediatek MT6750 processor, and its performance speed is 1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). The "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" uses an Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 CPU that performs at a speed of 2.2GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" has significantly higher specs than the "Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB". The "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" proves to be more advanced than the "Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB" in the way that apps run quickly and games play smoothly. If you're looking for a high-spec smartphone that runs quickly and plays games smoothly, we recommend that you buy the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" rather than the "Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB".

ScoreCPU specs
Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB61/1001.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores)
vivo X20 (2017) 64GB86/1002.2GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores)

How is "Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB" different from "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" in terms of memory capacity?

Your device's multimedia performance and app stability are both influenced by the amount of memory it has available. The more memory, the more apps you can use simultaneously, while keeping everything stable and smooth. Plus, there'll be less chance of animations lagging or apps crashing. You also need to keep in mind that some games won't run at all if there's not enough memory available.

The "Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB" has 3.0GB of memory. The "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB", on the other hand, has 4.0GB. As for memory performance, the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" has a larger memory capacity than the "Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB", with a difference of about 1GB. The "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" has better multitasking, less crashing, and runs 3D games and VR video better than the "Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB". If you're looking for a smartphone that will remain stable even when you are using multiple apps at the same time, and which will allow you to play 3D games and VR video comfortably, we recommend that you buy the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" rather than the "Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB".

ScoreRAM size
Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB60/1003.0GB
vivo X20 (2017) 64GB70/1004.0GB

Which has a better storage capacity, "Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB" or "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB"?

Storage capacity determines the amount of data you'll be able to save on your device. The more storage you have, the more photos you can take and the more apps you can install. Plus, if your smartphone is compatible with SD cards, then you can increase the amount of available storage. However, SD cards have a slower writespeed, making them less desirable in terms of performance, and users should be aware that it won't be possible to transfer all kinds of data to the card.

The "Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB" has 32.0GB of storage, while the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" has 64.0GB. In terms of ROM and data storage, the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" has a much larger capacity than the "Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB", with a difference of about 32GB. The "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" can save more photos and keep more apps installed than the "Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB". If you're searching for a smartphone that can store more data, we recommended that you buy the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" rather than the "Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB".

ScoreStorage size
Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB55/10032.0GB
vivo X20 (2017) 64GB67/10064.0GB

Compare the rear cameras of "Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB" and "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB". Which one has better picture quality?

One factor in how well your rear camera (the camera on the back of your device) performs is its megapixel count. With a higher megapixel count, you'll be able to take photos with sharper detail, photos that stay clear and sharp even when printed.

The main camera on the "Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB" has 13.0MP. The "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" has 12.0MP. The rear facing cameras of the "Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB" and "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" have roughly the same performance, so the quality of the photograph and video footage they can capture is around the same. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.

ScoreRear-camera resolution
Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB61/10013.0MP
vivo X20 (2017) 64GB59/10012.0MP

Which has a front camera with better picture quality, "Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB" or "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB"?

One indication of how well your forward facing camera (the camera on the same side as your device's screen) performs is how many megapixels it has. More megapixels means you'll be able to take photos with sharper detail, that still look amazing printed out.

The forward-facing camera on the "Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB" has a resolution of 8.0MP. The "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB"'s has 12.0MP. The front-facing camera of the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" has a significantly higher number of pixels than the "Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB", with a difference of about 4MP. Therefore, the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" is more suitable for taking photos and videos than the "Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB". If you want to take and print high-quality selfies, we recommend buying the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" rather than the "Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB".

ScoreFront-camera resolution
Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB58/1008.0MP
vivo X20 (2017) 64GB70/10012.0MP

Compare Performance Specs

Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GBvivo X20 (2017) 64GB
ImageNokia 3.1 (2018) 32GBvivo X20 (2017) 64GB
MakerNokiavivo
Release date2018-052017-10
ColorBlue+Copper/Black+Chrome/White+IronMatte Black/Black+Gold/Gold/Rose gold/Blue/Pink
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)68.7mm x 146.3mm x 8.7mm75.2mm x 155.9mm x 7.2mm
Weight138.3g159.0g
Display size5.2inch6.01inch
Display typeIPS LCDSuper AMOLED
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 14401080 x 2160
Pixel density309ppi401ppi
Battery capacity2990.0mAh3250.0mAh
ChipsetMediatek MT6750Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660
CPU specs1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores)2.2GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores)
RAM size3.0GB4.0GB
Storage size32.0GB64.0GB
Rear-camera resolution13.0MP12.0MP
Front-camera resolution8.0MP12.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

Articles related to Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB
Articles related to vivo X20 (2017) 64GB

Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB

Articles related to Nokia 3.1 (2018) 32GB
Articles related to vivo X20 (2017) 64GB

vivo X20 (2017) 64GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as vivo X20 (2017) 64GB

New articles