Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Razer Phone 2 64GB vs Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB: Which is the best?

Created date: 2018-11-18 12:14:25, Updated date: 2020-04-16 21:48:48

Razer Phone 2 64GBNokia 8 (2017) 128GB
Razer Phone 2 64GBNokia 8 (2017) 128GB

How did the evaluations between the "Razer Phone 2 64GB" and "Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB" differ when we compared the two? We reviewed each of the most commonly scrutinized features. If you are thinking about which smartphone to get, check out this review immediately!

Razer Phone 2 64GBNokia 8 (2017) 128GB
Razer Phone 2 64GB

Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB

General rating:

71.9/100

(The 3401th of all smartphones)

73.2/100

(The 1024th of all smartphones)

Holding comfort
54/100
65/100
Weight
47/100
66/100
Screen size
85/100
78/100
Display quality
87/100
89/100
Battery life
80/100
66/100
Processing power
94/100
91/100
Memory capacity
93/100
90/100
Storage capacity
67/100
90/100
Rear camera performance
59/100
61/100
Front camera performance
58/100
71/100

"Razer Phone 2 64GB" and "Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB", performance comparison

"Razer Phone 2 64GB" and "Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB" size comparison. Which to choose?

The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.

The "Razer Phone 2 64GB" has a width of 79.0mm, a length of 158.5mm, and a thickness of 8.5mm. Also, the "Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB" has a width of 73.7mm, a length of 151.5mm, and a thickness of 7.9mm.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "Razer Phone 2 64GB". The "Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB" excels over the "Razer Phone 2 64GB" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB" over the "Razer Phone 2 64GB".

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the "Razer Phone 2 64GB" and the "Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB". For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

Comparing the overall size of the two devices, the "Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB" has a large size compared to the "Razer Phone 2 64GB". For that reason the "Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB" is a size that is easier to use in one hand and comfortably carry than the "Razer Phone 2 64GB". That's why we recommend the "Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB".

ScoreDimensions (width x height x thickness)
Razer Phone 2 64GB54/10079.0mm x 158.5mm x 8.5mm
Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB65/10073.7mm x 151.5mm x 7.9mm

"Razer Phone 2 64GB" and "Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison

The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.

The weight of the "Razer Phone 2 64GB" is about 220.0g, and the weight of the "Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB" is about 160.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB" is a considerably lighter smart phone than the "Razer Phone 2 64GB", and there is a difference of about 60g. In terms of the burden placed upon your fingers and wrist, the "Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB" is superior to the "Razer Phone 2 64GB". If you are going for a smart phone that won't lead to hand fatigue even after extended use, and is less likely to place a burden on your fingers, we recommend purchasing the "Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB" over the "Razer Phone 2 64GB".

ScoreWeight
Razer Phone 2 64GB47/100220.0g
Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB66/100160.0g

"Razer Phone 2 64GB" and "Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB", whose display is easier to use?

The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.

The "Razer Phone 2 64GB" has a 5.72inch display. Also, the "Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB" has a 5.3inch display. Comparing the screen size, the "Razer Phone 2 64GB" has a larger screen compared to the "Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB", with a roughly 0.41inch difference. As a result, the user is less likely to mistap when using apps on the "Razer Phone 2 64GB" than on the "Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB", and is also able to enjoy videos and games on a larger screen. Therefore, we recommend the "Razer Phone 2 64GB".

ScoreDisplay size
Razer Phone 2 64GB85/1005.72inch
Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB78/1005.3inch

"Razer Phone 2 64GB" and "Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB", which has a clearer display?

Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.

The resolution on the "Razer Phone 2 64GB" is 1440 x 2560, and pixel density is 513ppi. Also, the resolution on the "Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB" is 1440 x 2560, and pixel density is 554ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the difference in pixel density between the "Razer Phone 2 64GB" and the "Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB" is negligible. As a result, they are both evenly matched in terms of picture quality and easiness on the eyes. Therefore, we recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScorePixel density
Razer Phone 2 64GB87/100513ppi
Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB89/100554ppi

"Razer Phone 2 64GB" and "Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB", a summary of the differences in battery life

Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.

The "Razer Phone 2 64GB" is 4000.0mAh, and the "Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB" is 3090.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "Razer Phone 2 64GB" has greater battery capacity than the "Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB", with a 910mAh difference. Since the "Razer Phone 2 64GB" can be used for longer periods without recharging than the "Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB", it is great for outdoor use. If you want a smartphone with a longer battery life, we recommend the "Razer Phone 2 64GB" over the "Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB".

ScoreBattery capacity
Razer Phone 2 64GB80/1004000.0mAh
Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB66/1003090.0mAh

"Razer Phone 2 64GB" and "Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB", which has better CPU?

CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.

The "Razer Phone 2 64GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845, with performance measured at 2.8GHz+1.7GHz×8(8.0-cores). Also, the "Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm MSM8998 Snapdragon 835, with performance measured at 2.5GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, there is almost no difference in the specs of the "Razer Phone 2 64GB" and the "Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB". For that reason the level of smoothness felt when using apps and comfortable handling of games is about the same. For that reason it is better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreCPU specs
Razer Phone 2 64GB94/1002.8GHz+1.7GHz×8(8.0-cores)
Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB91/1002.5GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores)

"Razer Phone 2 64GB" and "Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?

RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.

The weight of the "Razer Phone 2 64GB" is 8.0GB and the weight of the "Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB" is 6.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, there is almost no difference in the amount of RAM of the "Razer Phone 2 64GB" and the "Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB". For that reason they have about the same level of multitasking performance and 3D game and VR smoothness. That's why it is better to make a comparison in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreRAM size
Razer Phone 2 64GB93/1008.0GB
Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB90/1006.0GB

"Razer Phone 2 64GB" and "Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB", which has more data storage?

Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.

The data storage capacity of the "Razer Phone 2 64GB" is 64.0GB. Also the "Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB" is 128.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "Razer Phone 2 64GB", with a roughly 64GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB" is superior to the "Razer Phone 2 64GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB" over the "Razer Phone 2 64GB".

ScoreStorage size
Razer Phone 2 64GB67/10064.0GB
Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB90/100128.0GB

"Razer Phone 2 64GB" and "Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"Razer Phone 2 64GB" has a 12.0MP main camera. Also, "Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Razer Phone 2 64GB" and "Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB" have approximately the same pixel count. As a result, they can both take pictures and shoot videos of roughly the same quality. Therefore, we recommend comparing the two based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreRear-camera resolution
Razer Phone 2 64GB59/10012.0MP
Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB61/10013.0MP

"Razer Phone 2 64GB" and "Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"Razer Phone 2 64GB" has an 8.0MP front camera and "Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB" has an 13.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Razer Phone 2 64GB", with a roughly 5MP difference. As a result, the "Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB" is more suited than the "Razer Phone 2 64GB" for shooting videos and taking pictures. If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting high resolution selfies which will look clean when printed, we recommend the "Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB" over the "Razer Phone 2 64GB".

ScoreFront-camera resolution
Razer Phone 2 64GB58/1008.0MP
Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB71/10013.0MP

"Razer Phone 2 64GB" and "Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB", performance comparison by specification sheet

Razer Phone 2 64GBNokia 8 (2017) 128GB
ImageRazer Phone 2 64GBNokia 8 (2017) 128GB
MakerRazerNokia
Release date2018-102017-10
ColorMirror back/Rugged satinTempered Blue/Polished Blue/Steel/Polished Copper
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)79.0mm x 158.5mm x 8.5mm73.7mm x 151.5mm x 7.9mm
Weight220.0g160.0g
Display size5.72inch5.3inch
Display typeIGZO IPS LCDIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)1440 x 25601440 x 2560
Pixel density513ppi554ppi
Battery capacity4000.0mAh3090.0mAh
ChipsetQualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845Qualcomm MSM8998 Snapdragon 835
CPU specs2.8GHz+1.7GHz×8(8.0-cores)2.5GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores)
RAM size8.0GB6.0GB
Storage size64.0GB128.0GB
Rear-camera resolution12.0MP13.0MP
Front-camera resolution8.0MP13.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

Articles related to Razer Phone 2 64GB
Articles related to Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB

Razer Phone 2 64GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Razer Phone 2 64GB

Articles related to Razer Phone 2 64GB
Articles related to Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB

Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Nokia 8 (2017) 128GB

New articles