Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Which is better, Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB or Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB? We compared their features and specs in detail

Created date: 2018-11-18 10:59:47, Updated date: 2020-04-16 21:11:52

Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GBGalaxy J3 (2017) 16GB
Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GBGalaxy J3 (2017) 16GB

Are you having trouble comparing the differences in features and performance of the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" and "Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB", or unsure about their differences in ease-of-use, and wondering which to buy? We did a deep-dive comparison of the features, specs, and capabilities of these two smartphone, and provided our rating of which one was a better buy.

Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GBGalaxy J3 (2017) 16GB
Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB

Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB

General rating:
Portabilityrating-image2.9
76.4mm x 161.9mm x 8.8mm
rating-image3.5
70.3mm x 143.2mm x 8.2mm
Weightrating-image2.5
201.0g
rating-image3.7
142.0g
Size of screenrating-image4.5
6.4inch
rating-image3.7
5.0inch
Screen clarityrating-image4.4
514ppi
rating-image3.0
293ppi
Battery durationrating-image4.0
4000.0mAh
rating-image2.8
2400.0mAh
Processing capabilityrating-image4.7
2.7GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores)
rating-image2.0
1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores)
Memory capacityrating-image4.7
8.0GB
rating-image2.5
2.0GB
Storage capacityrating-image4.8
512.0GB
rating-image2.5
16.0GB
Rear camera functionrating-image3.0
12.0MP
rating-image3.1
13.0MP
Front camera functionrating-image2.9
8.0MP
rating-image2.5
5.0MP

Compare Performance and Usability

Size comparison of "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" and "Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB". Which one would you choose?

Your device's size has a huge influence on how easy it is to hold or to operate with one hand. The smaller your device's width, the easier it will be to hold, but you'll also need to take device thickness into account. And when the length and width are both smaller, you'll find that it's much easier for you to operate it one-handed, since your fingers will find it much easier to reach where you want them to. On the other hand, longer lengths and wider widths might lead to devices that are hard to carry in your pocket, bulky even when you keep them in your bag, and all around less portable.

The "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" is 76.4mm wide, 161.9mm tall, and 8.8mm thick. The "Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB" is 70.3mm tall, 143.2mm wide, and 8.2mm thick.

The "Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB" is also more compact than the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" in terms of the thickness of the devices. The "Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB" is easier than the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" to hold with one hand, and you are less likely to accidentally drop it. If you're looking for a smartphone that fits nicely in your hand and can be gripped firmly, we recommend buying the "Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB" rather than the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB".

Comparing the width and height of the main unit, the "Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB" is smaller and more compact than the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB". As a result, the "Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB" is easier to operate with one hand and it is more portable without getting in your way than the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB". Therefore, the "Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB" is recommended.

Comparing the overall sizes, the "Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB" is significantly smaller than the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB". The "Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB" is more convenient than the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" to use with one hand, and it is less likely to get in your way when not using it. If you prefer a smartphone that is easy to carry around and easy to use with one hand, we recommend that you buy the "Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB" rather than the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB".

ScoreDimensions (width x height x thickness)
Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB58/10076.4mm x 161.9mm x 8.8mm
Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB70/10070.3mm x 143.2mm x 8.2mm

Which one is easier to hold, "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" or "Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB"? Compare weight

The device weight will effect how quickly you tire from holding it, and how much stress is put on your wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you can hold it without feeling tired. Also, less stress on your wrist will make using it easier and more pleasant. Unless the weight is right for you, it might put too much strain on your body and make using it more stressful.

The "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" weighs 201.0g. The "Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB" clocks in at 142.0g. If you compare the weight of the two, the "Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB" is a considerably lighter smartphone than the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB", with a difference of about 59g. Because of this, the "Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB" puts less of a burden on the fingers and wrists than the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB". If you want a smartphone that won't tire your hands out even when using it for a long time, we recommend that you buy the "Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB" rather than the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB".

ScoreWeight
Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB49/100201.0g
Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB73/100142.0g

Which is better in terms of display, "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" or "Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB"?

Screen size influences how well you can control your device, as well as how clear the display is. With a large screen, the text and buttons in apps will display large enough so you'll be less likely to accidentally tap the button next to the one you were aiming for. Plus, you'll be able to enjoy more high-impact visuals for games and movies.

The screen size on the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" is 6.4inch, and 5.0inch on the "Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB". Comparing the sizes of the screens and displays, the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" is considerably larger than the "Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB", with a difference of about 1.4inch. Compared to the "Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB", the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" makes buttons in apps easier to press, and the visuals look more impressive in videos and games. The larger screen of the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" also has the advantage of being less tiring on the eyes. If you want to avoid tapping the wrong place, enjoy videos and games on a large screen, and not get tired eyes while using it, we recommend that you buy the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" rather than the "Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB".

ScoreDisplay size
Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB90/1006.4inch
Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB74/1005.0inch

Which one has a better display, "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" or "Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB"?

Pixel density influences how nice your device's screen looks, with high pixel densities making screens look more beautiful, and letting you get more out of your games and movies. Plus, the nicer you screen looks, the less strain you'll be putting on your eyes, so you'll tend to be able to use your device for longer before your eyes get tired.

The screen on the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" has a 1440 x 2960 resolution and a pixel density of 514ppi. The "Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB", on the other hand, has a screen resolution of 720 x 1280 and a pixel density of 293ppi. Comparing the screen definition, the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" has a much higher pixel density than the "Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB", with a difference of about 221ppi. The screen on the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" is clear and crisp, and puts less strain on the eyes than that of the "Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB". If you want to choose a smartphone that is gentle on your eyes with a display that shows text and images clearly, we recommend that you buy the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" rather than the "Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB".

ScorePixel density
Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB87/100514ppi
Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB59/100293ppi

How is the battery duration of "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" different from that of "Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB" ? See the differences

Battery performance has a big effect on the battery life of your device. However, a high battery capacity doesn't necessarily mean a long battery life. Rather, the rate of power consumption needs to be taken into consideration as well. The larger the screen and the higher the CPU performance, the higher the rate of power consumption on your battery.

The "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" has a battery capacity of 4000.0mAh, while the "Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB" has a 2400.0mAh battery. With regards to battery performance, the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" has a substantially larger battery capacity than the "Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB", with a difference of 1600mAh. The "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" can be used without charging for a longer time than the "Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB", so it can be used when out and about. If you want a smartphone with a longer-lasting battery, we recommend that you buy the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" rather than the "Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB".

ScoreBattery capacity
Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB80/1004000.0mAh
Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB56/1002400.0mAh

Which is better in terms of CPU function, "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" or "Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB"?

Your CPU's speed will influence the processing power of the applications you run, and together with the number of cores in the CPU, as well as its clock frequency, will determine the processing power available for apps. The higher these performance factors, the smoother your games and apps will run. Conversely, if these factors are too low, your apps and games will be sluggish and struggle to run.

The "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" is equipped with a Exynos 9810 processor, and its performance speed is 2.7GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). The "Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB" uses an Exynos 7570 Quad CPU that performs at a speed of 1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" has significantly higher specs than the "Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB". The "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" proves to be more advanced than the "Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB" in the way that apps run quickly and games play smoothly. If you're looking for a high-spec smartphone that runs quickly and plays games smoothly, we recommend that you buy the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" rather than the "Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB".

ScoreCPU specs
Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB94/1002.7GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores)
Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB39/1001.4GHz×4(4.0-cores)

How is "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" different from "Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB" in terms of memory capacity?

Your device's multimedia performance and app stability are both influenced by the amount of memory it has available. The more memory, the more apps you can use simultaneously, while keeping everything stable and smooth. Plus, there'll be less chance of animations lagging or apps crashing. You also need to keep in mind that some games won't run at all if there's not enough memory available.

The "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" has 8.0GB of memory. The "Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB", on the other hand, has 2.0GB. As for memory performance, the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" has a larger memory capacity than the "Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB", with a difference of about 6GB. The "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" has better multitasking, less crashing, and runs 3D games and VR video better than the "Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB". If you're looking for a smartphone that will remain stable even when you are using multiple apps at the same time, and which will allow you to play 3D games and VR video comfortably, we recommend that you buy the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" rather than the "Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB".

ScoreRAM size
Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB93/1008.0GB
Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB50/1002.0GB

Which has a better storage capacity, "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" or "Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB"?

Storage capacity determines the amount of data you'll be able to save on your device. The more storage you have, the more photos you can take and the more apps you can install. Plus, if your smartphone is compatible with SD cards, then you can increase the amount of available storage. However, SD cards have a slower writespeed, making them less desirable in terms of performance, and users should be aware that it won't be possible to transfer all kinds of data to the card.

The "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" has 512.0GB of storage, while the "Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB" has 16.0GB. In terms of ROM and data storage, the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" has a much larger capacity than the "Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB", with a difference of about 496GB. The "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" can save more photos and keep more apps installed than the "Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB". If you're searching for a smartphone that can store more data, we recommended that you buy the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" rather than the "Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB".

ScoreStorage size
Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB95/100512.0GB
Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB50/10016.0GB

Compare the rear cameras of "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" and "Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB". Which one has better picture quality?

One factor in how well your rear camera (the camera on the back of your device) performs is its megapixel count. With a higher megapixel count, you'll be able to take photos with sharper detail, photos that stay clear and sharp even when printed.

The main camera on the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" has 12.0MP. The "Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB" has 13.0MP. The rear facing cameras of the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" and "Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB" have roughly the same performance, so the quality of the photograph and video footage they can capture is around the same. Because of this, it is better to compare them based on other aspects of performance and function.

ScoreRear-camera resolution
Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB59/10012.0MP
Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB61/10013.0MP

Which has a front camera with better picture quality, "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" or "Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB"?

One indication of how well your forward facing camera (the camera on the same side as your device's screen) performs is how many megapixels it has. More megapixels means you'll be able to take photos with sharper detail, that still look amazing printed out.

The forward-facing camera on the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" has a resolution of 8.0MP. The "Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB"'s has 5.0MP. Comparing the front-facing camera performance, the number of pixels of the front-facing camera on the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" is higher than the "Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB", with a difference of approximately 3MP. For this reason, it is possible to take higher quality selfies and make clear prints with the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" than the "Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB". Therefore, the "Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB" is recommended.

ScoreFront-camera resolution
Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB58/1008.0MP
Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB50/1005.0MP

Compare Performance Specs

Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GBGalaxy J3 (2017) 16GB
ImageSamsung Galaxy Note9 512GBGalaxy J3 (2017) 16GB
MakerSamsungSamsung
Release date2018-082017-07
ColorMetallic Copper/Lavender Purple/Ocean Blue/Midnight Black/Pure White/Alpine WhiteWhite/Black/Gold/Blue
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)76.4mm x 161.9mm x 8.8mm70.3mm x 143.2mm x 8.2mm
Weight201.0g142.0g
Display size6.4inch5.0inch
Display typeSuper AMOLEDPLS
Screen resolution (width x height)1440 x 2960720 x 1280
Pixel density514ppi293ppi
Battery capacity4000.0mAh2400.0mAh
ChipsetExynos 9810Exynos 7570 Quad
CPU specs2.7GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores)1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size8.0GB2.0GB
Storage size512.0GB16.0GB
Rear-camera resolution12.0MP13.0MP
Front-camera resolution8.0MP5.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

Articles related to Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB
Articles related to Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB

Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB

Articles related to Samsung Galaxy Note9 512GB
Articles related to Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB

Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Galaxy J3 (2017) 16GB

New articles